- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: qualify your credentials on deciding if CLM is raise-worthy
Posted on 11/28/12 at 3:30 pm to CharlesLSU
Posted on 11/28/12 at 3:30 pm to CharlesLSU
10-2 should be expected not rewarded.
3
Posted on 11/28/12 at 3:32 pm to Topwater Trout
quote:
10-2 should be expected not rewarded.
Posted on 11/28/12 at 3:44 pm to Topwater Trout
quote:
10-2 should be expected not rewarded.
What about 23-3 soon to be 24-3, and a SEC title and NC birth? Should that be rewarded? Les wasn't given a raise last year or the year before. In fact, I believe its been since 2007 since he's received a raise. It's market value; he is due.
Posted on 11/28/12 at 4:00 pm to Topwater Trout
quote:How about 13-1? Or going 34-5 in your last 3 seasons? Or winning 78.5% of your games since your last raise?
10-2 should be expected not rewarded.
Should that be rewarded or just expected?
If someone meets every expectation over and over again, and even sometimes exceeds them, should they be rewarded?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News