- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: This Is Why The Seahawks Won, Regardless of Bad Call
Posted on 9/26/12 at 2:04 pm to wildtigercat93
Posted on 9/26/12 at 2:04 pm to wildtigercat93
quote:
Oh and GB caught it first and then GT out his hands on it on the way down. Not a simultaneaus catch
First of all, Tate's hands touched the ball first, before Jennings' did, and secondly, it does not matter what happened in the air, as possession is not obtained by a defender until he touches the ground, and by then, both Tate and Jennings had a grasp on the ball.
Catch Tate, Touchdown, case closed. Only Hawks haters and Packer homers see this differently.
Posted on 9/26/12 at 2:07 pm to PurpleReignUW
And I was just about to say, I'm sure this clown is convinced that the refs made the right call
Posted on 9/26/12 at 2:07 pm to PurpleReignUW
Where is the exclusive angle of the pass intereference not occuring, and the exclusive angle of the official not signaling to stop the clock, when in fact his hands were merely pushed together by a strong pacific northwestern breeze?
This post was edited on 9/26/12 at 2:08 pm
Posted on 9/26/12 at 2:08 pm to PurpleReignUW
quote:
Catch Tate, Touchdown, case closed. Only Hawks haters and Packer homers see this differently.
im neither and i see it differently
Posted on 9/26/12 at 2:09 pm to PurpleReignUW
quote:
First of all, Tate's hands touched the ball first, before Jennings' did, and secondly, it does not matter what happened in the air, as possession is not obtained by a defender until he touches the ground, and by then, both Tate and Jennings had a grasp on the ball.
having a few fingers touching the ball does not count as possession or grasp of the ball...its clear to me that tate has to wrestle jennings after hes already on the ground just to get his hands on the ball
Posted on 9/26/12 at 2:10 pm to PurpleReignUW
quote:
First of all, Tate's hands touched the ball first, before Jennings' did, and secondly, it does not matter what happened in the air, as possession is not obtained by a defender until he touches the ground, and by then, both Tate and Jennings had a grasp on the ball.
Touching the ball does not matter. Corralling the ball into you chest all the way to te ground does. Tate only had one hand on the ball the entire way down and then later while on the ground started grabbing it to act like he caught it. He had no part of that catch and it was a bullshite call and you know it
quote:
Catch Tate, Touchdown, case closed. Only Hawks haters and Packer homers see this differently.
EVERY PERSON THAT ISNT A SEAHAWKS FAN SEES IT THAT WAY RETARD
Posted on 9/26/12 at 2:10 pm to PurpleReignUW
This guy is trolling. He can't be this stupid.
Posted on 9/26/12 at 2:11 pm to wildtigercat93
quote:
Hawks haters
Who even thinks about them enough to be a hater?
Posted on 9/26/12 at 2:13 pm to genro
quote:
This guy is trolling. He can't be this stupid.
Im thinking youre right.
Posted on 9/26/12 at 2:14 pm to PurpleReignUW
quote:
First of all, Tate's hands touched the ball first, before Jennings' did, and secondly, it does not matter what happened in the air, as possession is not obtained by a defender until he touches the ground, and by then, both Tate and Jennings had a grasp on the ball.
Catch Tate, Touchdown, case closed. Only Hawks haters and Packer homers see this differently.
Sir, I applaud your efforts
Posted on 9/26/12 at 2:19 pm to PurpleReignUW
I generally classify people as delusional as you to be a danger to themselves.
Posted on 9/26/12 at 2:22 pm to PurpleReignUW
quote:
Catch Tate, Touchdown, case closed. Only Hawks haters and Packer homers see this differently.
Uh.....one of my best friends is a Husky/Hawk fan and he knows they got a gimme. He's gonna take it but he sure as hell isn't going to pretend that Tate actually caught and had simultaneous possession.
Posted on 9/26/12 at 2:23 pm to genro
quote:
This guy is trolling. He can't be this stupid.
He's a Husky, it's quite possible.
Posted on 9/26/12 at 2:25 pm to PurpleReignUW
I detect no bias is your arguments. None whatsoever.
Posted on 9/26/12 at 2:27 pm to PurpleReignUW
quote:
PurpleReignUW
You
Are
fricking
Stupid
Posted on 9/26/12 at 2:28 pm to TigerBait2008
quote:
Only Hawks homers see this differently.
FIFY
This post was edited on 9/26/12 at 2:29 pm
Posted on 9/26/12 at 2:37 pm to TigerBait2008
“It was a simultaneous catch, that’s how they called it,” Carroll said. “Good call.”
Carroll smiled as he described his emotions.
“What a Monday Night Football game,” Carroll said. “Tremendous night.”
Carroll smiled as he described his emotions.
“What a Monday Night Football game,” Carroll said. “Tremendous night.”
Posted on 9/26/12 at 2:40 pm to SDVTiger
Is it just me or does this new angle make it even more obvious that it was an interception? OP is retarded. And I can't stand the Packers. Tate pushed off. Green Bay intercepted it. Packers got screwed. Case closed.
Posted on 9/26/12 at 2:41 pm to SDVTiger
I love how they said green bay and the fan should have taken the high road. LOL
Posted on 9/26/12 at 2:44 pm to Duzz
Seattle and their reaction to this "win" is rather foul and pathetic
The best option is to shut the frick up and enjoy your stolen victory
The best option is to shut the frick up and enjoy your stolen victory
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News