- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Letterman sold out
Posted on 9/19/12 at 3:42 pm to theunknownknight
Posted on 9/19/12 at 3:42 pm to theunknownknight
quote:
He IS FREAKING PRESIDENT while our embassies across the world are under assault.
Let's take each phrase one at a time.
"He IS FREAKING PRESIDENT"
Doesn't that make him sort of a great guest? I mean, I don't know about you, but if I had a show built around booking famous people, getting the FREAKING PRESIDENT is a pretty great get. I mean, isn't that sort of Letterman's job? To get guests that people will want to watch to drive up his ratings? You realize you're currently arguing that a talk show booking the Most Powerful Man in the World is somehow bad and something he shouldn't do.
Part two:
"while our embassies across the world are under assault"
I'm not sure why this matters at all. Letterman's not a news reporter and he's not going to grill the president on foreign policy. But let's say it really does matter. The embassies are part of this nation. so we are therefore under assault, but your own admission.
Aren't we supposed to rally around our leaders and public officials when we are under attack? Isn't that why people were very bad for criticizing W agter 9/11? If we are "under assault", shouldn't we be rallying behind the Head of State?
I was trying to interpret your comments as being angry over helping a political candidate over another candidate because, frankly, I can't figure out why anyone would be angry by the alternative. You're mad that Letterman booked the President when given a chance? Really?
Why? I can't fathom why. W appeared on Ellen when he was president. Does that make Ellen a sell out? Or was she just, you know, getting a great booking?
Posted on 9/19/12 at 4:56 pm to Baloo
Does this soothe the ruffled feathers of the "Letterman has sold out crowd?"
Posted on 9/19/12 at 6:01 pm to Baloo
quote:
Doesn't that make him sort of a great guest? I mean, I don't know about you, but if I had a show built around booking famous people, getting the FREAKING PRESIDENT is a pretty great get. I mean, isn't that sort of Letterman's job? To get guests that people will want to watch to drive up his ratings? You realize you're currently arguing that a talk show booking the Most Powerful Man in the World is somehow bad and something he shouldn't do.
You've gone full tard. In one post you imply that a candidate going on Letterman equates to the actual President (who, frankly has more important things to do right now) as some veiled attack on Bush/conservatives. Your assertion implies that Bush and Obama being on are really no different.
Ok then, I responded saying both being on are not the same by virtue of one being in office. You respond by bringing up Letterman's decision making rationale? I don't give a crap about why Letterman did what he did. I care about why OBAMA did what he did.
This post was edited on 9/19/12 at 6:15 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News