- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Question about football in Los Angeles
Posted on 5/25/12 at 6:28 am
Posted on 5/25/12 at 6:28 am
This might be a stupid question but why couldnt they start an expansion team like the Texans did 10 or so years ago?
Posted on 5/25/12 at 6:34 am to lsuguy13
because everything is perfectly set up right now
Posted on 5/25/12 at 6:56 am to lsuguy13
I would assume its becuase we have 8 divisions with 4 teams each. Nice round number.
Posted on 5/25/12 at 7:04 am to DCSportsBeerMan
Need approval from the league and team owners.
Posted on 5/25/12 at 7:50 am to cjared036
Yeah, they should just move an already existing less attended franchise there, how can that fail.
Posted on 5/25/12 at 7:53 am to lsuguy13
Because if there is a team in LA, then the owners won't have LA to use in order to hold municipalities hostage when they want new stadiums.
Plus, advertisers don't like having the second largest market blacked out for half the season.
Plus, advertisers don't like having the second largest market blacked out for half the season.
Posted on 5/25/12 at 8:19 am to Sophandros
quote:Also, many of the existing owners would rather not have a new owner get to cash in on all that L.A. money; they'd probably feel a lot better if one of them got to move their team to L.A. instead.
Because if there is a team in LA, then the owners won't have LA to use in order to hold municipalities hostage when they want new stadiums.
Posted on 5/25/12 at 8:24 am to M Le Rip
I was always under the impression that Houston sorta snaked LA back when they got the Texans. Houston sold themselves better to the NFL, while LA thought the NFL was just going to give them a franchise.
Posted on 5/25/12 at 8:28 am to Akit1
quote:Obviously Houston was more proactive when it came to providing an NFL-ready stadium.
I was always under the impression that Houston sorta snaked LA back when they got the Texans. Houston sold themselves better to the NFL, while LA thought the NFL was just going to give them a franchise.
The problem with Los Angeles is that it doesn't have a stadium with less than a 90,000 seating capacity, and that means they can sell 89,999 tickets every game and be in the top 3 in NFL attendance but still be blacked out in the 2nd biggest tv market in the country; that's why the Rams moved to Anaheim in the first place to a smaller, easier-to-fill stadium that was out of the city enough that a big chunk of Los Angeles would be exempt from blackout restrictions. If L.A. has a 70,000-seat stadium in the middle of the city, it's all gravy.
This post was edited on 5/25/12 at 8:31 am
Posted on 5/25/12 at 8:33 am to Sophandros
quote:
Because if there is a team in LA, then the owners won't have LA to use in order to hold municipalities hostage when they want new stadiums.
ding, ding ding
quote:
Plus, advertisers don't like having the second largest market blacked out for half the season
you still get a game when the home team is blacked out
Posted on 5/25/12 at 8:36 am to H-Town Tiger
quote:
you still get a game when the home team is blacked out
how many games does LA get each week now? 3?
Posted on 5/25/12 at 8:48 am to TigerintheNO
quote:
how many games does LA get each week now? 3?
I would assume so. That's what we got in Houston after the Oilers left and before the Texans started in 2002.
This post was edited on 5/25/12 at 8:49 am
Posted on 5/25/12 at 9:31 am to H-Town Tiger
Another big reason Houston got the team over LA is because Bob McNair got a lot of oil and gas related companies(headquartered here in Houston) to pledge to buy huge season ticket packages. All but guaranteeing sell outs each and every year.
Having the city in a position to help finance the deal was also a huge factor. HLSandRodeo also pledged a huge amount of support$$$$ for the deal.
Houston having a previous NFL/AFL history also added some flak to their argument.
Perfect mix of success in this deal....
The oilers left because no stadium deal was in place. The owner was incredibly incensed that the Astros got their city financing deal before he did. (teams no longer wanted to share facilities). The Oilers would still be here if they were a just a bit patient, three more years and a deal would have gotten done.
Another large factor for LA Not making my progress it the fact that there is two competing stadium bids for a stadium. Coupled with the fact there are a lot of special intereats that would love to get some attention from a Hugh profile deal. I honestly doubt a deal ever gets done.
Bob McNair had the whole city of Houston behind his efforts. NFL made the obvious choice.
Typos in this. Posting from iPhone
Having the city in a position to help finance the deal was also a huge factor. HLSandRodeo also pledged a huge amount of support$$$$ for the deal.
Houston having a previous NFL/AFL history also added some flak to their argument.
Perfect mix of success in this deal....
The oilers left because no stadium deal was in place. The owner was incredibly incensed that the Astros got their city financing deal before he did. (teams no longer wanted to share facilities). The Oilers would still be here if they were a just a bit patient, three more years and a deal would have gotten done.
Another large factor for LA Not making my progress it the fact that there is two competing stadium bids for a stadium. Coupled with the fact there are a lot of special intereats that would love to get some attention from a Hugh profile deal. I honestly doubt a deal ever gets done.
Bob McNair had the whole city of Houston behind his efforts. NFL made the obvious choice.
Typos in this. Posting from iPhone
This post was edited on 5/25/12 at 9:32 am
Posted on 5/25/12 at 11:43 am to M Le Rip
They had the Rams. decades. Rams owners moved "franchise" to St Louis which had the Chicago/St Louis/Az Cardinals.
They had the Raiders, briefly and could not build a stadium.
The answer to your question is
1. sure, if you had a franchise.
2. they dont have a franchise.
They had the Raiders, briefly and could not build a stadium.
The answer to your question is
1. sure, if you had a franchise.
2. they dont have a franchise.
Popular
Back to top
3





