Started By
Message

re: Renderings of expansion from LSU

Posted on 4/19/12 at 6:13 am to
Posted by johnfredlsu
Member since Feb 2007
548 posts
Posted on 4/19/12 at 6:13 am to
The two images you've juxtaposed actually look nothing alike. Which is the problem. One is an imitation with proportions that are entirely off. It's not that I wouldn't want something that mirrors the north--it's that I DO want something that mirrors it. The renderings show that someone has taken that mirror and warped it, stretched it to fit a larger area without considering how the stretches and extensions conflict with the original inspiration.
Posted by Waffle House
NYC
Member since Aug 2008
3947 posts
Posted on 4/19/12 at 7:11 am to
quote:

The two images you've juxtaposed actually look nothing alike.

Again, they look infinitely more similar than what is down there now. Have any of you even see what the south endzone looks like from the outside?
quote:

proportions that are entirely off.

For now. I am not convinced that we wont eventually do the same to the NEZ, oaks or not. The plan, or was at one point, is to create a giant plaza and close off the road between the PMAC and TS. I also wouldn't put it past them to eventually tear down both of the sideline uppers (AGAIN) and follow a similar style as the SEZ. If they eventually utilize the space labeled "Future" on the designs for Gameday suites/condos/hotel, that would be a HUGE influx of money, without changing the footprint of the stadium and would be, as far as I am aware, unique to LSU.

I like the fact that it looks like one singular stadium between the lower bowl and the upper deck piece. I really like that all of the access ramps are housed internally or they tie into existing ramps on the east and west upper.

It isn't for everyone but I think it is a sincere attempt to capture the look of the NEZ, while creating a modern flexible space. There are issues I have with parts of it, and hopefully those can be tweaked as they get some of the public feed back, but overall I am satisfied. No matter what they put in the SEZ, they were not going to please everyone, as evident by this thread.
Posted by hg
Member since Jun 2009
123864 posts
Posted on 4/19/12 at 7:52 am to
Posted by bbap
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2006
96070 posts
Posted on 4/19/12 at 7:57 am to
quote:

The two images you've juxtaposed actually look nothing alike. Which is the problem.


They look a lot alike. They dont have to be 100% alike. It looks great.
Posted by Roberteaux
mandeville
Member since Sep 2009
5826 posts
Posted on 4/19/12 at 8:29 am to
quote:

The two images you've juxtaposed actually look nothing alike. Which is the problem. One is an imitation with proportions that are entirely off. It's not that I wouldn't want something that mirrors the north--it's that I DO want something that mirrors it. The renderings show that someone has taken that mirror and warped it, stretched it to fit a larger area without considering how the stretches and extensions conflict with the original inspiration.


finally, someone who gets it...
Posted by spslayto
Member since Feb 2004
19750 posts
Posted on 4/19/12 at 10:02 am to
quote:

The two images you've juxtaposed actually look nothing alike. Which is the problem. One is an imitation with proportions that are entirely off. It's not that I wouldn't want something that mirrors the north--it's that I DO want something that mirrors it. The renderings show that someone has taken that mirror and warped it, stretched it to fit a larger area without considering how the stretches and extensions conflict with the original inspiration.


It is not as if you can see them both at the same time anyway. Is someone going to walk from the North endzone around to the South endzone and complain that the proportions are off? Some people will complain about everything. Good is never good enough.
This post was edited on 4/19/12 at 10:04 am
Posted by mikethetiger
Member since Nov 2004
1879 posts
Posted on 4/19/12 at 11:20 pm to
The renderings released by LSU seem to be preliminary and will probably evolve in the next few months when more engineering work is incorporated into the design. You can see examples of how designs of the baseball and softball stadiums evolved from concept to finished product below for an example of what I am talking about:

Baseball rendering released around August 2006


Baseball rendering released around December 2006 (notice they raised the suites/press box another level and the stairs were moved inwards)


Baseball construction started June 2007


Baseball stadium as built




Softball rendering early release


Softball rendering later release (notice the area below the roof at the back of the stadium)


Softball stadium as built (notice the roof is no longer a cantilever design but is more a suspension design)
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram