whoa, lets not get carried away. I wouldn't want to trade a pick, let alone the top 2 for a WR. Think about it, you are not going to get Fitz or CJ (not that we could afford them under the cap anyway) no other Recs are worth that. IMO outside of RB WR is the most fungible position. You can find those guys. Its a need, but not a give up 2 picks need. Yeah Jones is not good and his boneheaded PR hurt in the Balt game, but realy we lost that game because of an inexpirienced QB.

The more I think about, the more I like the idea of Joe Adams in the 2nd or 3rd and go DE/LB in the first or I wouldn't mind Fleener. I know people will freak out if they take a TE, but as the Pats have shown, 2 good rec TE's is just as good as 2 good WR.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by texastiger38

Member since Sep 2007

25259 posts

Posted on 4/18/12 at 12:27 pm to H-Town Tiger

I just don't want them to take an OL in the first round. We dont NEED a starter this year, just someone to develop in the next year or so. That is one things the Texans have been good at, developing the OL.

I'd be fine with DE/OLB, WR, or TE in any combination in the first 3 rounds.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Haydo

DTX

Member since Jul 2011

2949 posts

Posted on 4/19/12 at 11:36 am to H-Town Tiger

quote:
The more I think about, the more I like the idea of Joe Adams in the 2nd or 3rd and go DE/LB in the first or I wouldn't mind Fleener

completely agree with this. However, all really depends on how Garrett Graham is. No one really knows, except the coaches. I would love fleener in the 1st, an OLB in the 2nd, and a good, under the radar type of guy in the 3rd at WR

0 ...

Report Post

More Sports - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board