Started By
Message

re: Teabagger in court today

Posted on 3/20/12 at 4:14 pm to
Posted by Thunder Tiger
Member since Sep 2011
2608 posts
Posted on 3/20/12 at 4:14 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 2/23/21 at 3:56 pm
Posted by piratedude
baton rouge
Member since Oct 2009
2521 posts
Posted on 3/20/12 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

The crime as quoted does not require sexual gratification of any sort. You get the frick over it.


Read my post. I am well aware of the language used in lrs 14:43.1(a) and that the title for the section is "sexual battery." I think everybody but stevie wonder and ray charles know that the facts show that teabagging violated the code article.

but we should expect more out of our government than blind following of rules. we want them to think, evaluate, and make rational decisions based on all of the facts and circumstances. In this case, I believe it would a ridiculous outcome for this a-hole to be branded as a sexual offender. he's just an a-hole.

and now, i believe sir that it is your turn to get the frick over it. and i mean that in the nicest way possible.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram