Started By
Message
locked post

bart scott

Posted on 2/28/12 at 12:20 am
Posted by saintsalwaysnumber1
Newport news Va
Member since Dec 2008
1372 posts
Posted on 2/28/12 at 12:20 am
Should we trade to get him.
Posted by LSUpsychWARD
Lafayette
Member since Dec 2007
4292 posts
Posted on 2/28/12 at 12:27 am to
quote:

Should we trade to get him.



Obviously not at this stage. Isn't he supposed to get cut? He would be a welcome addition to our lb corps although I'm sure the dumbasses that have seen him play once or twice on this board will all tell you how terrible he is and old, etc... The man would be an enormous upgrade at either OLB spot on our team
Posted by THRILLHO
Metry, LA
Member since Apr 2006
49539 posts
Posted on 2/28/12 at 12:27 am to
Sure, why not? You can never have enough aging, declining interior LBs, and it's not like we need that ~$4m he would cost us to sign any other players.
Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
72571 posts
Posted on 2/28/12 at 12:57 am to
frick bart scott
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64624 posts
Posted on 2/28/12 at 6:50 am to

quote:

Should we trade to get him.


can't wait
Posted by NS Who Dat Nation
BR
Member since Jul 2007
8801 posts
Posted on 2/28/12 at 8:55 am to
The dude's nickname is "The Mad Backer". Sign him up long term IMO.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
167032 posts
Posted on 2/28/12 at 8:58 am to
quote:

Should we trade to get him.



Nobody is trading to get him. He will be available after he gets cut.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram