Started By
Message

re: If Jeremy Hil is as good as advertised...

Posted on 2/3/12 at 9:07 am to
Posted by Elleshoe
Wade’s World
Member since Jun 2004
143616 posts
Posted on 2/3/12 at 9:07 am to
quote:

hilliard was way better.


you're literally the only person I've heard come to that conclusion.
Posted by Tiger Ryno
#WoF
Member since Feb 2007
103288 posts
Posted on 2/3/12 at 9:08 am to
I didn't watch every game of their high school but from what I saw in High school I would have said Hill was the more complete running back. Hilliard is a man and proved he can play right away but physically Hill is also a beast and is powerful, has great vision and also can run away from people
Posted by therocketscientist
too far away from Tiger Stadium
Member since Mar 2007
5010 posts
Posted on 2/3/12 at 9:09 am to
quote:

you're literally the only person I've heard come to that conclusion.


I love me some Hilliard, but I agree. Everyone seems to think Hill > Hilliard. Hard to believe, but if so, add to the embarrassment of riches!
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56921 posts
Posted on 2/3/12 at 11:30 am to
quote:

you're literally the only person I've heard come to that conclusion.



Come on. That was anything but a crazy statement.

You are wrong if you think it was clear cut that Hill was the better prospect out of highschool.
Posted by TulaneTigerFan
Seattle
Member since Sep 2005
35856 posts
Posted on 2/3/12 at 11:39 am to
quote:

you're literally the only person I've heard come to that conclusion


Really? I remember a lot of people thinking that Hilliard was better, and that Hill benefitted greatly from having Collins block for him. Didn't Hilliard break the LA high school rushing record and win some kind of national player of the year award as either a soph of junior?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram