- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
LSU permanent East opponent from here on
Posted on 12/29/11 at 5:49 pm
Posted on 12/29/11 at 5:49 pm
Am I correct in that it is USC with the other East team rotating out every two years?
Am I right in that The annual Florida series is over after next year?
Am I right in that The annual Florida series is over after next year?
4
Posted on 12/29/11 at 5:51 pm to Chd1478
Where did you hear this... 
Posted on 12/29/11 at 5:52 pm to halleburton
I think Florida is our permanent east opponent, with USCe rotating this year
Posted on 12/29/11 at 5:53 pm to Chd1478
The problem with this is I believe Mizzou wants A&M to be their permanent west opponent so they can have a presence in texas where they get a lot of their players. I've heard rumors of LSU and Florida wanting to stop playing each other and LSU would be willing to take USC and Mizzou would play arky. That would leave A&M with Florida.
This post was edited on 12/29/11 at 5:54 pm
Posted on 12/29/11 at 5:54 pm to Chd1478
quote:
Chd1478
quote:
Am I correct
NO you are NOT correct on either matter.
The schedule released is specifically for 2012 ONLY and does not reflect any future or past alignment or schedule.... 2013 and beyond will be voted on at the Spring meeting and that schedule will later be released.
Bottom line --- no you are wrong on both statements.
Posted on 12/29/11 at 5:54 pm to JBREAUX4LSU
The LSU and UF Athletic Departments were BOTH lobbying hard to scrap the series once it appeared conference expansion was inevitable.
LSU91...it makes sense now...Thanks
The fact that Missouri is placed in the East is absurd.
LSU91...it makes sense now...Thanks
The fact that Missouri is placed in the East is absurd.
This post was edited on 12/29/11 at 5:55 pm
Posted on 12/29/11 at 6:10 pm to Chd1478
No it's not. Mizzou is closer to Vanderbilt or Kentucky than any SEC West school, and isn't that far from Tenorcee either. Mizzou is close to Arky, but is closer to KY or Vandy than most other west division locations.
Besides, it's easier to put them in the east since TAMU is an obvious west choice. And the geography of it doesn't really matter anyway. Hell, the Saints and Falcons used to be in the NFC West.
You wanna see something screwed up? Try Boise St. in the Big East...lol.
Besides, it's easier to put them in the east since TAMU is an obvious west choice. And the geography of it doesn't really matter anyway. Hell, the Saints and Falcons used to be in the NFC West.
You wanna see something screwed up? Try Boise St. in the Big East...lol.
Posted on 12/29/11 at 6:13 pm to Fishhead
Florida for one more year. If we stick to cross divisional permanent opponents after next year, we will have Kentucky.
Posted on 12/29/11 at 6:16 pm to GFunk
quote:
we will have Kentucky
awesome.
Posted on 12/29/11 at 6:16 pm to Chd1478
There should be NO permanent East opponent now that there are 7 teams per division. That's retarded.
Eta: on another note, the division winner should be decided by division record since each team plays a different schedule against the other division.
Eta: on another note, the division winner should be decided by division record since each team plays a different schedule against the other division.
This post was edited on 12/29/11 at 6:18 pm
Posted on 12/29/11 at 6:16 pm to LSU91MBA
I would be very surprised if they didn't get the 9-conference game schedule done by 2013. They dropped the ball on doing it this year, need to get it done next year.
Posted on 12/29/11 at 6:18 pm to Fishhead
quote:
No it's not. Mizzou is closer to Vanderbilt or Kentucky than any SEC West school, and isn't that far from Tenorcee either. Mizzou is close to Arky, but is closer to KY or Vandy than most other west division locations.
Columbia, MO to Lexington 463 Miles
Columbia, Mo to Cashville 431 Miles
Columbia, Mo to Knoxville 609 Miles
Columbia, Mo to Fayetteville 312 Miles
Columbia, Mo to Oxford 477 Miles
Columbia, Mo to Starkvegas 575 Miles
This post was edited on 12/29/11 at 6:19 pm
Posted on 12/29/11 at 6:34 pm to saintsfan22
Well TAMU to Lexington is 983 miles
to Nashville is 774 miles
to Knoxville is 936 miles
Point is, where were they gonna put em? We don't have an SEC North.
The powers that be do not have in mind the convenience factor for fans when they do this kind of thing. They are all about attracting new markets, which equals new money.
to Nashville is 774 miles
to Knoxville is 936 miles
Point is, where were they gonna put em? We don't have an SEC North.
The powers that be do not have in mind the convenience factor for fans when they do this kind of thing. They are all about attracting new markets, which equals new money.
Posted on 12/29/11 at 6:48 pm to Fishhead
Auburn and Alabama to the East...Mizz and aTm in the West would have solved it.
Posted on 12/29/11 at 6:50 pm to Michael T. Tiger
quote:
Auburn and Alabama to the East...Mizz and aTm in the West would have solved it.
No ty I don't want to feel like were playing in a big 12 SWC merger division.
Posted on 12/29/11 at 8:49 pm to Michael T. Tiger
Yeah, I wouldn't want Bama and AU out of the west. No thanks.
Posted on 12/29/11 at 8:56 pm to Fishhead
My proposal
SEC Other
Vandy
Kentucky
Missou
USCe
Tennessee
Arkansas
UGA
SEC Gulf
Alabama
LSU
Ole Miss
Miss St
Florida
Texas AM
Auburn
Keep the one permanent opponent from the other side
Alabama-Tennessee
LSU-Arkansas
Florida-UGA
Auburn-USCe
Miss St-Kentucky
OM-Vandy
SEC Other
Vandy
Kentucky
Missou
USCe
Tennessee
Arkansas
UGA
SEC Gulf
Alabama
LSU
Ole Miss
Miss St
Florida
Texas AM
Auburn
Keep the one permanent opponent from the other side
Alabama-Tennessee
LSU-Arkansas
Florida-UGA
Auburn-USCe
Miss St-Kentucky
OM-Vandy
This post was edited on 12/29/11 at 9:00 pm
Posted on 12/29/11 at 9:09 pm to Fishhead
Bull Crap Alabama or Auburn would have been better East additions. Blow your smoke up someone elses arse!
This post was edited on 12/29/11 at 9:10 pm
Posted on 12/29/11 at 9:12 pm to Tiger Stadium 11
quote:
My proposal
I actually like this and would support it. Puts a pretty good spread of the power schools in each division and holds most of the rivalry games intact. Only rivalry I can think of missing in that alignment is UT-UF.
Great idea in my opinion!
Posted on 12/29/11 at 9:33 pm to Big Sway
Are there seriously bitches who want Bama and Auburn to the East? I knew a lot of y'all were pussies, but come the frick on.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News