re: Who are the largest Winners and Losers In the New SEC?

quote:

---

So you could beat them this year, or even last year? I look at Arkansas differently with the petrino.

I think Missouri has some of the same problems as Arkansas does, Isolation and lack of recruiting. I just feel
Like going forward as long as petrino is at Arkansas they will be good in football.

Now your basketball is better, no question.

Your baseball will be the worst program in sec by a 1000 miles!

I guess I would say stop living in 2008. what do you look like going forward?

---

Missouri does not beat us last year or this year. The series is 2 to 3 in over 110 years.

This is my point. Arkansas and Tennessee spend a lot of money getting deep south kids to come to their universities among recruits across the country. Our in-state talent isn't as good as LSU's or Alabama's to draw from but it IS better than Missouri and we both have more money and closer to the talent pools.

Arkansas and Tennessee's location is better than Missouri's because we are surrounded by better talent. Therefore, Missouri must spend a lot of money to attract kids that far north. Not to mention Texas kids, who attend Missouri, will no longer be playing games close to home unlike before.

Kentucky plays every year other year in Florida, Georgia and South Carolina and it hasn't helped their recruiting so why will it help Missouri?