Started By
Message

re: Passing Game looked Terrible

Posted on 10/1/11 at 3:48 pm to
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
125012 posts
Posted on 10/1/11 at 3:48 pm to
Forgive me if but did the receivers catch any better when JJ was in? I hope there isn't any truth to it, but subconsciously players Could be playing harder for their QB pick. Just saying
Posted by Icansee4miles
Trolling the Tickfaw
Member since Jan 2007
29350 posts
Posted on 10/1/11 at 3:52 pm to
There was always talk of receivers playing differently for Rohan than for Booty during that controversy (shocking, this isn't the first), but you sure would hate for any of that to enter into it...this is the thing about upsetting team chemistry I was worried about, and it looked like it was off today, for whatever reason (obviously only on offense)
Posted by Will2nd
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2009
3948 posts
Posted on 10/1/11 at 4:01 pm to
quote:

Forgive me if but did the receivers catch any better when JJ was in? I hope there isn't any truth to it, but subconsciously players Could be playing harder for their QB pick. Just saying


Jefferson did not make one throw, but a substitution penalty on the goal-line occurred with one of the TEs when he went in. So no, the passing game had nothing to do with him in my opinion. It likely had more to do with the offense wanting to pad stats rather than execute plays. It's understandable, but also correctable by getting the team to re-focus on the basics.

Can't give Lee a pass either. Some of those throws into double coverage will need to be corrected before going up against Florida and Alabama or things might get tougher than they need to be.
This post was edited on 10/1/11 at 4:05 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram