- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Drive
Posted on 9/17/11 at 12:17 am
Posted on 9/17/11 at 12:17 am
hmmmnnn not what i was expecting. overall pretty good. very gory though. ending was mehhh
Posted on 9/17/11 at 12:39 am to lsuguy13
My wife and I both liked it. I thought it was pretty unique and refreshing. I didn't read anything about it before I saw it, and it certainly wasn't what I was expecting. 
Posted on 9/17/11 at 2:28 am to lsuguy13
Drive will probably be the year's most overrated film. The more I think about it, the less I like it. My Drive review. All the glowing reviews I read describe its greatness in one of two veins: the movie is novel, not limited to a specific genre (being novel is not necessarily good) and the performance of Gosling. I will give the movie the latter, but how does anyone reconcile the rest of the movie with the positive reviews? I just don't understand the critical reception being so positive. I blame it on a lack of roots, culturally and morally, keeping D Brooks recent editorial in mind. There's plenty of style in the movie, but where's the meat? The story is absolutely stupid.
This post was edited on 9/17/11 at 2:34 am
Posted on 9/17/11 at 7:39 am to lsuguy13
Friend of mine went to see it. He was really looking forward to it. But he texted me after getting out and said it was disappointing.
All style, no substance he said.
I went to see Contagion instead.
All style, no substance he said.
I went to see Contagion instead.
Posted on 9/17/11 at 7:57 am to Lacour
all of the reviews seemed to say the same thing
"it's mostly style over substance, but what style!"
i suppose i'll skip and wait for moneyball
"it's mostly style over substance, but what style!"
i suppose i'll skip and wait for moneyball
Posted on 9/17/11 at 8:00 am to drewhowie
Based on your appreciation for Tree of Life, I take you for someone who has taste. You would enjoy Drive.
Posted on 9/17/11 at 8:54 am to TulaneLSU
quote:
not limited to a specific genre
neo-noir
quote:
the performance of Gosling
um... you mean Albert Brooks? Gosling basically did nothing outside of shuffle around like a stoic knight. There was very little nuance to his performance.
quote:
I blame it on a lack of roots, culturally and morally
culturally? it's firmly entrenched in American noir tradition, with clear nods to european surrealism (the film was dedicated to alejandro jodoworsky). morally? are you kidding me? the archetypes are as clear as possible. the Driver is the knight, Irene is the pure, innocent "damsel," brooks and perlman being the evil king and dragon, respectively (taken from the mouth of Refn himself). If you couldn't discern the ethical standpoints of each character, then god help you.
quote:
There's plenty of style in the movie, but where's the meat? The story is absolutely stupid.
the story is a classic revenge tale. you want a detailed backstory? go read novels (and then posts reviews that no one reads). I suppose The Man With No Name trilogy is a failure because we don't know Clint Eastwood's history.
This post was edited on 9/17/11 at 8:55 am
Posted on 9/17/11 at 9:05 am to Leauxgan
You are an unbelievable snob
Posted on 9/17/11 at 9:07 am to Lacour
next time I'll let my friend text me to inform my opinion on how a movie is 
Posted on 9/17/11 at 9:10 am to Leauxgan
Saw it last night and it reminded a bit of Vanishing Point/Two Lane Blacktop mixed with Michael Mann's appreciation for L.A. noir scenery and a classic 70s revenge plot thrown in for good measure. The more I think about the ending, the more I like it.
Posted on 9/17/11 at 9:17 am to Leauxgan
I liked the movie. It was really suspenseful and intense most of the movie.
I don't understand how it can be said there was no story. It was a shorter movie that didn't waste a lot on stupid details; however, I thought there was meat.
A lot of people will say the ending was a disappointment, but it was where the story needed to go IMO.
I don't understand how it can be said there was no story. It was a shorter movie that didn't waste a lot on stupid details; however, I thought there was meat.
A lot of people will say the ending was a disappointment, but it was where the story needed to go IMO.
Posted on 9/17/11 at 10:20 am to Leauxgan
When you are an adult with children and employee pay roll to meet twice a month you don't have a lot of extra time to see movies.
I take the opinions of my friends when choosing how to spend the limited amount of movie going time I have.
Snob.
I take the opinions of my friends when choosing how to spend the limited amount of movie going time I have.
Snob.
Posted on 9/17/11 at 10:25 am to Lacour
quote:
When you are an adult with children and employee pay roll to meet twice a month you don't have a lot of extra time to see movies. I take the opinions of my friends when choosing how to spend the limited amount of movie going time I have. Snob.
I'm not a movie snob at all, and Drive was very enjoyable. I was throughly entertained throughout the movie.
Posted on 9/17/11 at 11:56 am to Lacour
Youre confusing my attack on tulanelsus passionate ignorance for snobbery, even despite that I substantiated my arguments (which snobs don't really do). If I'm a snob for attacking him, then basically the entire board is guilty and we should indeed call this place the Arts Board
Posted on 9/17/11 at 11:58 am to Lacour
Edit:Edit: doubledouble postpost
This post was edited on 9/17/11 at 12:02 pm
Posted on 9/17/11 at 12:32 pm to lsuguy13
Looks like some lame version of the Transporter.
Posted on 9/17/11 at 12:34 pm to WoWyHi
quote:
Looks like some lame version of the Transporter.
Yeah. Just like that.
Posted on 9/17/11 at 12:59 pm to WoWyHi
quote:
Looks like some lame version of the Transporter.
But with better acting all around, better cinematagraphy, and far less mindless action. Oh and it doesn't have the worst action star of all time in Jason Statham.
Posted on 9/17/11 at 1:16 pm to TulaneLSU
Gotta disagree with your review. Big difference in the opening scene and GTA. In GTA you have to kill a cop before helicopters come after you.
Posted on 9/17/11 at 1:23 pm to Superior Pariah
quote:
Looks like some lame version of the Transporter.
I think you mean, "this is what The Transporter would've been if it wasn't a mindless, comic book, popcorn movie."
Drive's pretty damn good. Everyone saying "style over substance" is wrong. For the type of movie this is, it's got a ton of substance. It didnt have any of the usual flourishes I was expecting from Refn, except maybe the out of period/place music. Definitely recommend this movie.
Popular
Back to top

8






