- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Can the Feds file an anti-trust suit against the SEC?
Posted on 9/6/11 at 3:20 am
Posted on 9/6/11 at 3:20 am
a la Microsoft....If SEC ends up being a super conference (when all is said and done with conference alignments) and there is danger that the SEC will dominate even more & shut everyone else out of a chance at winning the NC? Serious question.
Posted on 9/6/11 at 5:06 am to rickgrimes
Boise State, BYU and Utah State see no reason to protest "SEC Dominance". You might get some support from Oregon fans though.
Posted on 9/6/11 at 7:37 am to rickgrimes
No
I think the BCS could have an anti trust problem though.
I think the BCS could have an anti trust problem though.
Posted on 9/6/11 at 9:23 am to MoreOrLes
Individually the SEC is probably safe, they can argue that there are other similarly-situated conferences (PAC-xx, B1G, whatever comes out of the ACC/Big East).
This could be the problem, though, if MWC or C-USA were to complain (and probably get the support of MAC, WAC, and Sun Belt).
quote:
I think the BCS could have an anti trust problem
This could be the problem, though, if MWC or C-USA were to complain (and probably get the support of MAC, WAC, and Sun Belt).
Posted on 9/6/11 at 9:36 am to loweralabamatrojan
quote:
and Utah State
Posted on 9/6/11 at 9:52 am to TigerWoody
Expansion is the essence of competition. But the BCS is not. SEC is okay.
Posted on 9/6/11 at 9:57 am to MoreOrLes
Then you don't understand antitrust law at all then. Anybody that says the bcs is breaking antitrust law as its presently written is reaching big time and doesn't understand the law or how the bcs is setup.
Posted on 9/6/11 at 10:01 am to lsu777
Unless the other conference are colluding with the SEC to make sure only SEC teams win the national championship, there is no grounds for a suit.
Do you really think that is happening?
Do you really think that is happening?
Posted on 9/6/11 at 10:06 am to Dr Drunkenstein
BCS involves collusion among conferences to the exclusion of others.
Conference expansion is not collusion. There is an argument that the BCS does, hence the Utah Attorney General's posturing. I'm not saying it's legally correct, but it's there.
Conference expansion is not collusion. There is an argument that the BCS does, hence the Utah Attorney General's posturing. I'm not saying it's legally correct, but it's there.
Posted on 9/6/11 at 10:22 am to rickgrimes
quote:
there is danger that the SEC will dominate even more & shut everyone else out of a chance at winning the NC? Serious question.
wow, just wow
Posted on 9/6/11 at 10:24 am to Smoke Ring
No its not. The bcs is a group of companies that gets together at the end of the year voluntarly to have their best teams play the other companies best teams in games hosted by outside companies. They do this to make the most money for their companies.
The bcs doesn't price fix any good our service. The bcs doesn't stop any smaller conference they can't create their own system. It doesn't stop any other conference from doing anything. the bcs just doesn't invite the smaller conferences to its event at the end of the year.thats not breaking antitrust law.
Think about it like this:
A group of large woodworking companies decide that every new years day they will hold a compitition pinning each companies best woodworker against another companies best, and the new orleans arena says they would like to host one of the compititions and sell tickets to the event and they will pay each company 1 million for the rights. At the end.the winner is named bcs national champion.
Should smaller companies that weren't invited be able to file antitrust lawsuits? Hell no, it would be laughed out of court. Well the bcs is the samething.
Think of conferences as companies and schools as divisions in the company. When you do this, an antitrust law suit seems ridiculous.
Sorry for the spelling, I'm typing on a phone.
The bcs doesn't price fix any good our service. The bcs doesn't stop any smaller conference they can't create their own system. It doesn't stop any other conference from doing anything. the bcs just doesn't invite the smaller conferences to its event at the end of the year.thats not breaking antitrust law.
Think about it like this:
A group of large woodworking companies decide that every new years day they will hold a compitition pinning each companies best woodworker against another companies best, and the new orleans arena says they would like to host one of the compititions and sell tickets to the event and they will pay each company 1 million for the rights. At the end.the winner is named bcs national champion.
Should smaller companies that weren't invited be able to file antitrust lawsuits? Hell no, it would be laughed out of court. Well the bcs is the samething.
Think of conferences as companies and schools as divisions in the company. When you do this, an antitrust law suit seems ridiculous.
Sorry for the spelling, I'm typing on a phone.
Posted on 9/6/11 at 10:29 am to Smoke Ring
quote:
. There is an argument that the BCS does, hence the Utah Attorney General's posturing. I'm not saying it's legally correct, but it's there
I'm not a fan of anti-trust law, but that's a different topic. What would be awesome is if the Utah AG won and the current BCS Conferences and Bowls just went back to the old system. Not having a playoff is not a violation of anti-trust, there is no fricking way teams like Boise, TCU and Utah would have made Rose, Fiesta or Sugar bowls without the BCS
Posted on 9/6/11 at 10:33 am to H-Town Tiger
Yeah sfp has pointed this out multiple times. The current system is way better to the smaller schools then the old system. And the old system us what they would go back to, with maybe a plus one game afterwards at like, the cotton bowl and just call it the cotton bowl. Therefore fricking all small schools.
Popular
Back to top

3






