Started By
Message
locked post

Most restauranted cities per capita

Posted on 8/18/11 at 12:05 am
Posted by TulaneLSU
Member since Aug 2003
Member since Dec 2007
13298 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 12:05 am
Due to my great love for all of you, boredom, and the desire to correct faulty studies and perceptions, I decided to chart the number of restaurants in the largest 55 metro areas in America, as well as some cities of local interest. I used population numbers from the 2010 Census, as reported on Wikipedia. For large populations, I rounded to the 100,000th place. For smaller populations, I rounded to the 10,000th place. I got the restaurant totals from a national restaurant website that does a decent job of tracking restaurants in cities. However, this website group is located in Seattle and has a strong presence in the Northwest, so cities like Seattle, Portland, San Francisco, and Vancouver likely have a more accurate number of their restaurants listed than other cities, although I can vouch for the New Orleans number. The restaurant number also includes fast food and anywhere that sells prepared food if the food is cooked on the premises.

Here is the chart. The lower the number in the third column means the more restaurants per person.





Natchez, MS wins this contest with a restaurant for every 192 people. However, since there are only 20,000 residents, one could consider this too small a sample to compare with larger cities. Lafayette, LA, at 274 residents per restaurant does very well for mid-sized cities, beating out New Orleans 274 to 393. Baton Rouge? Not much positive can be said about the restaurant scene there, and this study furthers that perception. Of American metro areas with populations above 500,000, New Orleans places 12th out of 55 metro areas.

For large cities, Tampa is #1 with 321 people per restaurant. Not far behind are Orlando with 331, San Francisco-San Jose with 334, Hartford, CT with 336, and Seattle with 340.

Internationally, Vancouver would win the competition with 273 people per restaurant, but they're Canadian, and Canadians are not allowed to win.
This post was edited on 8/18/11 at 10:47 am
Posted by TheRoarRestoredInBR
Member since Dec 2004
30306 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 12:13 am to
I was just in Natchez and Vidalia for a week, after the Top 10 to 20 high quality haunts in Natchez, which are impressive in quality for a city it's size, the dropoff runs fast and hard!

BR may lack spectacular, but it has far better depth than Natchez, and across a much wider array of genres.

So cram that indignant BR jab back up..
This post was edited on 8/18/11 at 12:15 am
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76551 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 1:12 am to
Dear sir, can you arrange this in some order besides population?

Perhaps by people/restaurant?
Posted by Count Chocula
Tier 5 and proud
Member since Feb 2009
63908 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 9:15 am to
Lafayette has too many per population. Has for many years. What was once a non-chain, mom and pop dominated restaurant city (similar to NOLA) is now overpopulated with all the chains.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101669 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 9:40 am to
I was in Asheville, NC recently and I'm surprised not to see it on that list.

It's really got a vibrant and interesting restaurant scene for a place its size.

ETA, shite, I just realized this wasn't any sort of published list but something you did yourself. Holy freaking moly!
This post was edited on 8/18/11 at 10:05 am
Posted by Tigertown in ATL
Georgia foothills
Member since Sep 2009
29206 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 9:44 am to
quote:

Baton Rouge? Not much positive can be said about the restaurant scene there, and this study furthers that perception


Very silly statement because it is a gross over-generalization.

1st-54th in the entire country is not a bad ranking.

2nd-you make the assumption that restaurants per capita is somehow relevant to whether a restaurant scene is positive.

Based on your single criteria BR is better than Houston, New York DC and London.

In addition Shreveport is better than Austin.

If you let the very interesting data speak for itself, I say well done. Random conclusions are my objection.
Posted by bee Rye
New orleans
Member since Jan 2006
33964 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 9:45 am to
I think the most interesting thing is that all of these cities have populations that end in 4 consecutive 0's
Posted by bee Rye
New orleans
Member since Jan 2006
33964 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 10:26 am to
New orleans has 3878 places listed as restaurants in the phone book, can you re do your graph to include that number?
This post was edited on 8/18/11 at 10:27 am
Posted by LSUTygerFan
Homerun Village
Member since Jun 2008
33232 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 10:31 am to
Dang ! Lots of Louisiana cities on that list.
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
34514 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 11:12 am to
I'm curious where Huntsville, AL is on that list. I swear a new restaraunt opens up every day there. That place has more damn eateries than Shreveport-Bossier and less population.
Posted by Ole Geauxt
KnowLa.
Member since Dec 2007
50880 posts
Posted on 8/18/11 at 12:22 pm to
180 k for monroe?
that must have been on presidential voting day..
Posted by Zamoro10
Member since Jul 2008
14743 posts
Posted on 8/22/11 at 7:35 pm to
Carmel by the Sea, California.

Has to be up there. Whole town is restaurants.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram