Started By
Message
locked post

JPM (Chase Bank) net income increases 67%

Posted on 4/13/11 at 7:47 am
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
133528 posts
Posted on 4/13/11 at 7:47 am
Biggest improvements came from investment banking fees and a decrease in credit card losses.
quote:

The New York bank on Wednesday said it earned $5.6 billion, or $1.28 per share, compared with $3.3 billion, or 74 cents a share in the first quarter of last year. Analysts surveyed by FactSet forecast the bank would earn $1.15 per share.

Can a dividend increase not be far behind?

LINK
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 4/13/11 at 7:57 am to
I was going to start a thread today about investor complacency because no one has even mentioned reporting earnings. Just scanning the headline, it is interesting that they managed to increase NI that much while 1) increasing reserves [so rivers et. al take that horse somewhere else] and simultaneously seeing a 2) decrease in revenue.
This post was edited on 4/13/11 at 7:58 am
Posted by LSUBanker
Gonzales, La
Member since Sep 2003
2653 posts
Posted on 4/13/11 at 9:46 am to
quote:

Can a dividend increase not be far behind?


I believe Jamie announced last month that they were increasing the dividend after passing the gubment's "stress" test.

quote:

"We were pleased that our strong balance sheet allowed us to increase our annual dividend to $1.00 per share and to reestablish a significant share-repurchase program"


Just found this quote from him.
This post was edited on 4/13/11 at 9:48 am
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
133528 posts
Posted on 4/13/11 at 9:47 am to
quote:

I believe Jamie announced last month that they were increasing the dividend after passing the gubment's "stress" test.

You're right he did. I completely forgot about that. Raised it 500%. He said this morning in his conference call that he doesn't expect another increase "for a couple of quarters."
Posted by TigerDeBaiter
Member since Dec 2010
10659 posts
Posted on 4/13/11 at 11:29 am to
Interesting response:

quote:

WASHINGTON (CNNMoney) -- JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, who is critical of a key provision in the financial reform law, has been taken to task by a U.S. senator in a scathing letter. On the eve of JPMorgan's (JPM, Fortune 500) announcement of strong first-quarter profit, Sen. Richard Durbin, an Illinois Democrat, chastized the bank for warning its customers they may have to pay more in fees to use their debit cards.

"There is no need for you to threaten your customers with higher fees when you and your bank are already making money hand-over-fist," Durbin wrote to Dimon. "And there is no need to make such threats in response to reform that simply tries to spare consumers from bearing the cost of interchange fees that are anticompetitive and unreasonably high."

LINK

I figured something like this would come up. Rightfully so, to some extent..
Posted by LSUBanker
Gonzales, La
Member since Sep 2003
2653 posts
Posted on 4/13/11 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

Sen. Richard Durbin, an Illinois Democrat


Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 4/15/11 at 9:12 am to
Bank of America profit falls; finance chief named LINK ][LINK]

Just figured I'd post it in here rather than start another thread.
Posted by tirebiter
7K R&G chile land aka SF
Member since Oct 2006
10709 posts
Posted on 4/16/11 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

and to reestablish a significant share-repurchase program


A share repurchase program when shares were low priced would be meaningful to an investor, at high prices it is virtually meaningless to me and could be a poor use of cash.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
133528 posts
Posted on 4/16/11 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

A share repurchase program when shares were low priced would be meaningful to an investor, at high prices it is virtually meaningless to me and could be a poor use of cash.
I guess the issue is whether Dimon thinks the share price is low now. If he thinks it is high, he would not initiate a share repurchase program.
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 4/16/11 at 3:05 pm to
Historical precedent suggests that corporate America is notoriously bad at timing share repurchases. May or may not be the case here.
Posted by tirebiter
7K R&G chile land aka SF
Member since Oct 2006
10709 posts
Posted on 4/16/11 at 11:50 pm to
quote:

I guess the issue is whether Dimon thinks the share price is low now. If he thinks it is high, he would not initiate a share repurchase program.


With all due respect, I mean that as I respect your take on many investment oriented themes, share repurchases these days/past 10 years are nothing but a means of facilitating stock options for executives at the expense of share holders. This has been tested ad nauseam, numerous non-compensated studies support this basis. If a company really wanted to support and enhance common shareholders they would buy when prices were low to benefit the investors willing to hold stock through challenging financial times. Not buy shares when things were better and pay a high price then reissue the shares via options. I personally am sick of this shite. If for no other reason this gives me a valid rational belief to become a trader, although I don't prefer to have to watch a monitor all day long. YMMV.

PS I don't think I ever answered a point you made to me quite awhile ago about owning individual stocks vs ETFs, funds, etc regarding voting rights and letters written to boards of public co's, etc. I tried that route, it went nowhere, and after trying to effect legitimate change I finally said "F'it" and moved on to indexing and ETFs and attempting to find the best risk/reward trade off to make money vs being tied to and staying on top of say 40 stocks at all time. It fits me better and has worked well, others may have other opinions/results.

Posted by RasinCane
Member since Mar 2011
147 posts
Posted on 4/17/11 at 6:54 am to
ROTFLMAO. It will be interesting to see how well Jamie does when the Fed isn't shoveling money at him at near zippo interest rate and paying him to hold it and play casino games with it.
Thanks for the humor. Nothing like a good laugh to start the day.
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 4/19/11 at 10:53 am to
Goldman profit falls after preferred dividend LINK ][LINK]
Northern Trust net off 3.9% on low interest rate LINK ][LINK]
State Street profit off 5.3%; core results beat LINK ][LINK]
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 4/19/11 at 11:40 am to
Unrelated but JPM just charged me $20 for a box of checks and additional $18 for what most people would consider standard shipping (4 days, tracking).
Posted by tirebiter
7K R&G chile land aka SF
Member since Oct 2006
10709 posts
Posted on 4/19/11 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

$20 for a box of checks and additional $18


WTF and WOW. They keep soliciting me to open a checking acct and will then "give" me $150. Yeah, I bet that is how it would turn out.

A credit union will take much better care of you and can't beat the loan rates.
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 4/19/11 at 12:05 pm to
Loan rates? Mama says credit is the devil.

Posted by RasinCane
Member since Mar 2011
147 posts
Posted on 4/19/11 at 12:06 pm to
Yesterday I went down to the county vehicle registration office to register a car. The county NO LONGER ACCEPTS VISA CARDS but continues to take other credit cards, checks and cash. How bout them apples?
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 4/19/11 at 12:19 pm to
That one you and Henry were working on? Congrats on finally getting it running.
Posted by tirebiter
7K R&G chile land aka SF
Member since Oct 2006
10709 posts
Posted on 4/19/11 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

Loan rates? Mama says credit is the devil.


Hey, now, I never went that far. Bad borrowing habits, not saving, and spending more than you make is definitely a cocktail from hell.

Borrowing at very low rates when you can easily afford to repay the debt and/or it can reduce your tax rates is another story.
Posted by saint308
LA
Member since Oct 2010
496 posts
Posted on 4/19/11 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

Unrelated but JPM just charged me $20 for a box of checks and additional $18 for what most people would consider standard shipping (4 days, tracking).


Regions did the same to me, so I ordered from Wal Mart.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram