- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
With USC schollie reduction
Posted on 1/5/11 at 8:27 pm
Posted on 1/5/11 at 8:27 pm
how many guys will they be able to sign, and why are they still getting top kids? I saw they had 24 commits i thought they were giving up 10 schollies a year for 3 years, so would that mean they would have atleast 10 grey shirts if they get 25 limit?
3
Posted on 1/5/11 at 8:28 pm to nwaLSUfan
only this year, due to EE and back counting
Posted on 1/5/11 at 8:37 pm to nwaLSUfan
there losing 30 schollies over all so those guys that grey shirt are just going to go over and screw the next classes right?
Posted on 1/5/11 at 8:38 pm to nwaLSUfan
quote:
here losing 30 schollies over all so those guys that grey shirt are just going to go over and screw the next classes right?
Huh? They have EE spots, no greyshirts
Posted on 1/5/11 at 8:42 pm to RLDSC FAN
thats what im asking they have 24 commits but only 15 schollies, so it doesnt matter if you EE youre still going to have at least 9 guys without a scholarship
Posted on 1/5/11 at 8:44 pm to nwaLSUfan
Im not understanding you. The EE's are scholarship players. The scholarships count towards last years count
Posted on 1/5/11 at 8:46 pm to nwaLSUfan
quote:
thats what im asking they have 24 commits but only 15 schollies, so it doesnt matter if you EE youre still going to have at least 9 guys without a scholarship
schollie reduction does not apply this year with the appeal (unless they rule before signing day). They've yet to hear the appeal. Next weekend is supposed to be a great recruiting weekend too.
we are now up to #4 on Rivals.
This post was edited on 1/5/11 at 8:50 pm
Posted on 1/5/11 at 8:51 pm to LSUTANGERINE
gotcha, so the 10 reduction will apply to next years recruiting class
Posted on 1/5/11 at 8:53 pm to nwaLSUfan
Why would any kid want to play at USC if you are playing for no post season.
Posted on 1/5/11 at 8:54 pm to OU812
quote:
hy would any kid want to play at USC if you are playing for no post season.
Its only one year bro. Most of these kids will probably redshirt so it doesnt affect them much
Posted on 1/5/11 at 8:54 pm to OU812
quote:
Why would any kid want to play at USC if you are playing for no post season.
Only as a freshman or SO for JUCO's
Posted on 1/5/11 at 8:56 pm to LSUTANGERINE
The scholarship limit is the least of their worries. They have to play for Kiffin. Way to clean it up over there USC, nothing like hiring that guy to make the program on the right track.
Posted on 1/5/11 at 9:03 pm to Tiger Authority
What he do this year that was so bad? You think we should care what he did at UT? Ill be the first to admit that the jury is still out on his coaching abilities but some of you are just hoping he gets in trouble. He did fine this year in that regard
This post was edited on 1/5/11 at 9:04 pm
Posted on 1/5/11 at 9:05 pm to RLDSC FAN
Yeah, Lugz was being retarded when he said USC is recruiting very well and is highly ranked despite the scholarship reduction numbers. Pretty clueless thing to say.
Posted on 1/5/11 at 9:07 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
What he do this year that was so bad? You think we should care what he did at UT? Ill be the first to admit that the jury is still out on his coaching abilities but some of you are just hoping he gets in trouble. He did fine this year in that regard
Posted on 1/5/11 at 9:12 pm to nwaLSUfan
they are appealing. nothing has been implemented except the bowl ban, year 1 of 2.
its as if nothing happened, to their recruiting, so far.
once the appeal is heard, I have my fingers crossed for an increase in penalties to show USC what sick fricks they are for fighting this penalty about Bush. NCAA didnt even penalize them for having Bush talk to McKnight, which McKnight briefly admitted and then recanted, all on video. I am hoping for another couple of subtracted scholarships for not submitting.
its as if nothing happened, to their recruiting, so far.
once the appeal is heard, I have my fingers crossed for an increase in penalties to show USC what sick fricks they are for fighting this penalty about Bush. NCAA didnt even penalize them for having Bush talk to McKnight, which McKnight briefly admitted and then recanted, all on video. I am hoping for another couple of subtracted scholarships for not submitting.
Posted on 1/5/11 at 9:16 pm to ottothewise
quote:
to show USC what sick fricks they are for fighting this penalty about Bush.
Sick fricks for appealing?
What school has not appealed a verdict?Posted on 1/5/11 at 10:58 pm to RLDSC FAN
The only concern they should have is taking so many Jucos.Those guys are very hit or miss.Mostly miss.Still great job by them for taking advantage of the rules that allow them to.Next 3 years will be killer for them though depth wise.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News