- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Who woulda thunk it..
Posted on 11/14/10 at 9:49 pm
Posted on 11/14/10 at 9:49 pm
S Carolina beating Bama could possibly have cost LSU a shot at the NC. IF Bama wins that game and beats AUB, and LSU wins out. Bama, Aub, and LSU are all 7-1, 3 way tie, LSU would be the highest ranked in the BCS at that point.
Posted on 11/14/10 at 9:51 pm to kjntgr
AUB would still be sec west champs
Posted on 11/14/10 at 9:51 pm to kjntgr
Is the BCS one of the last deciders in a three-way tie in the SECW? I know we took adv of a similar rule two years ago 

Posted on 11/14/10 at 9:53 pm to kjntgr
If only Mississippi State's dumbass receiver could catch...
Posted on 11/14/10 at 9:53 pm to ellishughtiger
quote:
AUB would still be sec west champs
based on what?
Posted on 11/14/10 at 9:54 pm to ellishughtiger
We would have been.
Perfect three-way tie among Alabama, Auburn and LSU.
We would have the higher BCS ranking because:
1) Our loss came first
2) Our non-conference wins, and therefore our strength of schedule, is best.
Perfect three-way tie among Alabama, Auburn and LSU.
We would have the higher BCS ranking because:
1) Our loss came first
2) Our non-conference wins, and therefore our strength of schedule, is best.
Posted on 11/14/10 at 9:56 pm to kjntgr
and to think we were so happy at the time of that victory. fricking karma 

Posted on 11/14/10 at 9:56 pm to moneyg
quote:
AUB would still be sec west champs based on what?
They clinched on Saturday!
Posted on 11/14/10 at 9:58 pm to Tiger Phil
quote:
Perfect three-way tie among Alabama, Auburn and LSU.
We would have the higher BCS ranking because:
1) Our loss came first
2) Our non-conference wins, and therefore our strength of schedule, is best.
yep 1, definitely. But you know the boner that the media has for Bama

Posted on 11/14/10 at 10:00 pm to kjntgr
If I hadn't spilled my beer on that girl on the dance floor I could've married into money.
Posted on 11/14/10 at 10:01 pm to castorinho
Yes, but there would be almost nothing differentiating the three teams:
All would have won at home and lost on the road, and by a touchdown or less (assuming a close Bama win the Iron bowl)
So then LSU's wins over two BCS non-conference opponents would put us there.
Might be close, but it would get us there.
All would have won at home and lost on the road, and by a touchdown or less (assuming a close Bama win the Iron bowl)
So then LSU's wins over two BCS non-conference opponents would put us there.
Might be close, but it would get us there.
Posted on 11/14/10 at 10:03 pm to Tiger Phil
Alabama would have been #1 all the way to the LSU game and wouldn't have dropped that far.
LSU's superior computer rating probably would put them on top of the BCS standing out of the three but it would be very close.
Almost like a 3, 4, 5 thing.
LSU's superior computer rating probably would put them on top of the BCS standing out of the three but it would be very close.
Almost like a 3, 4, 5 thing.
Posted on 11/14/10 at 10:28 pm to The Boat
Bama would not have been #1 all the way, nov 7 they lost.
Posted on 11/14/10 at 10:36 pm to kjntgr
Dude... Its AU and Bama and the SEC. You know we would have been screwed somehow. No way Slive and the SEC lets us through.
This was a year that required us to go undefeated to get a shot at the NC. We didn't do it. Nuff said.
This was a year that required us to go undefeated to get a shot at the NC. We didn't do it. Nuff said.
Posted on 11/14/10 at 10:38 pm to kjntgr
quote:
Bama would not have been #1 all the way, nov 7 they lost.
"Alabama would have been #1 all the way to the LSU game and wouldn't have dropped that far."
...
Posted on 11/14/10 at 10:42 pm to kjntgr
WOW! this is not that difficult to comprehend...
If BAMA didn't lose to SC and we lost to AU and beat BAMA and then BAMA beat AU we would ALL have 1 loss (each being ON THE ROAD). At this point it would go to the highest BCS ranking which would be US (LSU) because our loss would have happened earliest. We would go to the SECC game and if we won and got some help in the polls would be playing in the NCC...COME ON MAN!!!
Too bad (granted the scenerio was accurate) we couldn't just convince the SEC to allow us to put our mascots (live) into a concrete room and just hash it out and the one remaining after 5 min. would go to Atlanta...
If BAMA didn't lose to SC and we lost to AU and beat BAMA and then BAMA beat AU we would ALL have 1 loss (each being ON THE ROAD). At this point it would go to the highest BCS ranking which would be US (LSU) because our loss would have happened earliest. We would go to the SECC game and if we won and got some help in the polls would be playing in the NCC...COME ON MAN!!!
Too bad (granted the scenerio was accurate) we couldn't just convince the SEC to allow us to put our mascots (live) into a concrete room and just hash it out and the one remaining after 5 min. would go to Atlanta...
Posted on 11/14/10 at 10:49 pm to moneyg
quote:
based on what?
There's about 200,000 reasons, I believe....
Posted on 11/14/10 at 10:57 pm to ryanoz
quote:it's a real bitch huh?
fricking karma
Popular
Back to top
