- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Opposite of '07?
Posted on 11/7/10 at 7:45 pm
Posted on 11/7/10 at 7:45 pm
Remember the big argument about Georgia not winning the conference in '07 so they didn't deserve to get to the MNC game. I have a good feeling all you purple and gold glasses wearing fools with change your tone if a miracle happens and LSU gets put in that same spot. Let the "this is different" comments begin.......
Posted on 11/7/10 at 7:46 pm to LurkingNoMore
quote:
LurkingNoMore
Go back and play with Saban's wiener.
Posted on 11/7/10 at 7:48 pm to LurkingNoMore
IT IS F'ING DIFFERENT.
There was ZERO argument for putting UGA in over LSU. LSU had a better record, tougher schedule, better wins, better losses, and the SEC championship was just an extra.
Idiot.
There was ZERO argument for putting UGA in over LSU. LSU had a better record, tougher schedule, better wins, better losses, and the SEC championship was just an extra.
Idiot.
Posted on 11/7/10 at 7:49 pm to LurkingNoMore
quote:
Let the "this is different" comments begin.......
This is different. There is an entire BCS thread stickied at the top of this board wherein many posters have been discussing this very scenario. You're obviously incapable of comprehending why this is different. Go read that thread, try to understand why this is different, THEN you can start threads about it. Otherwise.. go away.
Posted on 11/7/10 at 7:50 pm to lsumatt
(no message)
This post was edited on 11/7/10 at 8:54 pm
Posted on 11/7/10 at 7:51 pm to LurkingNoMore
quote:
Let the "this is different" comments begin.......
How about explaining how it's not different? Or were you just looking to flame?
Posted on 11/7/10 at 7:52 pm to LurkingNoMore
Give me one objective reason UGA should have gone. ONE.
I gave mine:
1. LSU had a better record
2. LSU had a much tougher schedule
3. LSU never lost to a 6 -loss team
4. LSU had a higher MOV
5. LSU had more impressive wins
6. LSU was higher in the computers
I don't even have to mention the SEC Championship
I gave mine:
1. LSU had a better record
2. LSU had a much tougher schedule
3. LSU never lost to a 6 -loss team
4. LSU had a higher MOV
5. LSU had more impressive wins
6. LSU was higher in the computers
I don't even have to mention the SEC Championship
Posted on 11/7/10 at 7:53 pm to LurkingNoMore
quote:
Yessssss! It only took 3 posts. LS-losers. What's bad is I graduated from there, wife lettered and graduated from there, and I own season tickets for football but I just have grown to loathe LSU fans and have decided to use this moment to publicly say so. That is all.
Good.....got that off your chest...now frick off
Posted on 11/7/10 at 7:57 pm to lsusteve1
I am still waiting for the one objective reason UGA should have gone over LSU. If you put the two head to head in any reasonable category for determining who plays for a NC...LSU gets it every time.
And no one is arguing that LSU should go over say a 1-loss SEC Champ AU. NO ONE.
And no one is arguing that LSU should go over say a 1-loss SEC Champ AU. NO ONE.
Posted on 11/7/10 at 7:59 pm to LurkingNoMore
quote:
Yessssss! It only took 3 posts. LS-losers. What's bad is I graduated from there, wife lettered and graduated from there, and I own season tickets for football but I just have grown to loathe LSU fans and have decided to use this moment to publicly say so. That is all.
GFY!
Posted on 11/7/10 at 8:00 pm to LurkingNoMore
quote:
Yessssss! It only took 3 posts. LS-losers.
Do you realize how pathetic you sound? Good for you. Hope you had your box of kleenex nearby when you shot your load.
quote:
What's bad is I graduated from there,
Highly, HIGHLY doubtful.
quote:
wife lettered and graduated from there
and she's fricking your brother.
Posted on 11/7/10 at 8:01 pm to lsumatt
quote:
And no one is arguing that LSU should go over say a 1-loss SEC Champ AU. NO ONE.
Really? Let AU lose to Georgia and win out and see if that statement holds true.
Posted on 11/7/10 at 8:02 pm to Central Tiger
I'm fricking his wife right now. 
Posted on 11/7/10 at 8:03 pm to LurkingNoMore
Still waiting for a good reason UGA should have gone over LSU. Was it their worse record, easier schedule, loss to a mediocre South Carolina team, lack of great wins?
Posted on 11/7/10 at 8:04 pm to Central Tiger
(no message)
This post was edited on 11/7/10 at 8:37 pm
Posted on 11/7/10 at 8:07 pm to LurkingNoMore
quote:
Hey Central tiger, one thing I don't do is lie. Say whatever else u want to but don't accuse me of a lie
Liar, Liar, pants on fire!!!!
Posted on 11/7/10 at 8:07 pm to LurkingNoMore
quote:
Georgia not winning the conference in '07
UGA didn't win it in '07 and they sure as hell at gonna win it this year, so STFU and GTFO.
Posted on 11/7/10 at 8:09 pm to LurkingNoMore
quote:
but I'm sure you are some ditch digger with a mere high school diploma
Dude you are freaking prick
Posted on 11/7/10 at 8:11 pm to LurkingNoMore
quote:
Really? Let AU lose to Georgia and win out and see if that statement holds true.
Oh so you're entire argument is just speculating that in the future LSU fans will be hypocrites...
idiot
Posted on 11/7/10 at 8:18 pm to LurkingNoMore
In general, the presumption should be that a team that doesn't win its conference should not be in the BCSCG, however, one can easily create scenarios where the presumption should be overcome, as when a one loss team doesn't make the conference championship and the winner of the conference has 2 losses. I thought that in 2007 and I still think that. But the difference is that in 2007, LSU had the best over all body of work, and had more wins over ranked teams that UGA did. UGA was playing well at the end of the season, but LSU had played more ranked teams than UGA, including a defeat of the ACC conference champion. UGA could not overcome the presumption that LSU as conference champion should go to the championship over UGA who didn't win its division and because UGA did not have a strong a schedule and nor number of wins over ranked teams that LSU had. It is really pretty simple.
Popular
Back to top

8





