Started By
Message
locked post

Pacific-12 divisions

Posted on 6/16/10 at 7:58 am
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 7:58 am
If you go by lines of latitude:

Pacific-12 North
Colorado
Oregon
Oregon State
Utah
Washington
Washington State

Pacific-12 South
Arizona
Arizona State
California
Southern California
Stanford
UCLA

Posted by TopWaterTiger
Lake Charles, LA
Member since May 2006
12024 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 8:23 am to
makes sense.....decent conference
Posted by JEAUXBLEAUX
Bayonne, NJ
Member since May 2006
55375 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 8:44 am to
I want to see a Utah nebraska Rose Bowl
Posted by duboisd
Aransas Pass, Texas
Member since Jan 2006
2515 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 9:21 am to
That's really the only logical way to go. East-West doesn't work without the Big XII schools.
Posted by StormTiger
Norwich, England (from Texas)
Member since Dec 2003
4923 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 10:01 am to
quote:

I want to see a Utah nebraska Rose Bowl


that would be mildly humorous...
Posted by 1999
Where I be
Member since Oct 2009
33159 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 10:05 am to
i've read in some articles that utah was promised a spot in the south division with the arizona schools. hmmm.
Posted by bigjuice56
Ponchatoula, LA
Member since Mar 2009
1136 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 10:28 am to
I find that hard to believe. First off, Utah should be chomping at the bit to get into a BCS conference. Secondly, I don't see the 4 California teams getting split, and that's the only way you could get Utah in the South.
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
60812 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 10:34 am to
quote:

I don't see the 4 California teams getting split, and that's the only way you could get Utah in the South.


It doesn't have to be geographically perfect. You could have this:

Wash
Wash St
Utah
Colorado
Az
ASU

Oregon
OSU
Cal
Stanford
USC
UCLA
Posted by usc6158
Member since Feb 2008
38619 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 11:08 am to
quote:

If you go by lines of latitude:

Pacific-12 North
Colorado
Oregon
Oregon State
Utah
Washington
Washington State

Pacific-12 South
Arizona
Arizona State
California
Southern California
Stanford
UCLA



This is the only setup that makes much sense. All of the California schools are going to insist on being in the same division. Same goes for the Washington and Oregon schools
Posted by Tiger Phil
I see burnt orange everywhere
Member since Nov 2007
1669 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 11:12 am to
I have heard they may split the divisions "like a zipper". That way, each team would be guaranteed at least one trip to Los Angeles each year.
Posted by bigjuice56
Ponchatoula, LA
Member since Mar 2009
1136 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 11:21 am to
If you look at how they used to do divisions in baseball in the 90s;

South:
Arizona
Arizona St.
UCLA
USC
Cal
Stanford

North:
Oregon St.
Washington
Washington St.
Portland St.

It only makes sense for Utah and Colorado to be in the North and be the newest forced "rivalry" due to conference expansion.

Posted by TDTGodfather
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
6196 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 11:28 am to
quote:

i've read in some articles that utah was promised a spot in the south division with the arizona schools. hmmm.


i say we split up the CA rivals

division A
Cal
UCLA
Washington
Washington St
Oregon
Oregon St

division B
USC
Stanford
Colorado
Utah
Arizona
Arizona St

the only problem with the above is the travel for UCLA in regards to the rest of their division sans Cal.
This post was edited on 6/16/10 at 11:30 am
Posted by The White Lobster
Member since Jul 2009
16764 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

That way, each team would be guaranteed at least one trip to Los Angeles each year.

Do USC and UCLA cease playing road games?
Posted by Tiger Phil
I see burnt orange everywhere
Member since Nov 2007
1669 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 12:20 pm to
Oops. I meant every other year.
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
60812 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 12:20 pm to
They'd have to play 11 conference games, but I think it would be possible for everyone to get 1 LA trip per year
This post was edited on 6/16/10 at 12:23 pm
Posted by SeattleTiger19
Member since Oct 2007
4537 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 12:24 pm to
Only need a conference if you will play a conference title game. IMHO
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
37153 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 12:29 pm to
JMO

North

Cal
Colorado
Oregon
Oregon State
Washington
Washington State

South

Arizona
Arizona State
Southern California
Stanford
UCLA
Utah

I put Cal in the north (not ridiculous in a geographical sense) - if this is a political no go because all the Cali schools must be together then disregard I suppose
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
60812 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

all the Cali schools must be together then disregard I suppose


its not that, but you can't seperate Cal and Stanford unless they are doing perm opponents from the other division.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
37153 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 12:34 pm to
well, i'm biased by teh SEC model but I think doing one permanent opp division opponent is good because it can let rivals keep playing (aub/uga) and create/strengthen new rivalries (lsu/fla)

Posted by usc6158
Member since Feb 2008
38619 posts
Posted on 6/16/10 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

I put Cal in the north (not ridiculous in a geographical sense) - if this is a political no go because all the Cali schools must be together then disregard I suppose



Unless they plan on doing permament rivals like the SEC, which I'm not a fan of, Stanford, SC, UCLA and Cal will all push hard to be in the same division. These are the 4 schools that pretty much control the Pac-10 politically also. The Washington and Oregon schools are going to want the same setup for them.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram