Started By
Message
locked post

Not So Fast My Friend, Texas Reconsidering PAC 10 Move

Posted on 6/13/10 at 12:57 pm
Posted by TenTex
Member since Jan 2008
15949 posts
Posted on 6/13/10 at 12:57 pm
LINK The Big 12 may survive after all. I think Texas knows A&M is not going and Oklahoma is not 100% behind them if A&M goes to the SEC.

quote:

Three different sources at Big 12 South schools being targeted by the Pac-10 told Orangebloods.com Sunday morning that Dan Beebe's attempts to secure a new TV deal on par with the SEC's $17 million/school payout for the 10 remaining schools in the Big 12 is in play.

The sources said they are proceeding cautiously with the new information provided by Beebe.

But the information might slow down the rocket-like pace of Big 12 schools seeking a new home and possibly draw all the divided parties back to the table.

Here's what Beebe has provided to the five Big 12 South schools who have been targeted by the Pac-10, including Texas A&M, who has been in deep conversation about joining the SEC, according to sources.

--Beebe has secured information that enough money could be inked in its next TV negotiation (in 2011) that revenues per school would jump from between $7 million and $10 million in the Big 12 currently to $17 million, which is what the SEC pays out.


--Individal institutions would be allowed to pursue their own networks, which has been a goal of Texas. If the Longhorns went to the Pac-10, they would have to forgo their own distribution platforms, including a network, because the Pac-16 would seek to have a conference network in which all inventory is shared.

(Consultants have put Texas' ability to generate revenue from its own network at between $3 million and $5 million after a start-up window of about three years.)


--The Big 12 would proceed with 10 teams. Everyone would play everyone in football, providing a nine-game conference schedule. And the option to save or dump the conference championship game would be determined by the institutions.


--The loss of Nebraska and Colorado should have been a loss of about 16 percent to the league's revenue generating capacity. But because Colorado was an underperformer, the league lost only about 8.6 percent of its value with the loss of Nebraska, according to sources with knowledge of the Beebe Plan.

Hold on folks. This is about to get interesting. The key in all of this is that Texas appears to be at least reconsidering its position on going to the Pac-10 and will listen to the Beebe proposal and to the idea of remaining in the Big 12.

Nothing is done. It is fluid. But the Beebe Plan to hold the Big 12 together is definitely in play right now.

As Orangebloods.com was told by a top source in the day's developments: "The winds to keep the Big 12 together with 10 teams are getting stronger."

The plot only figures to thicken as Pac-10 commissioner Larry Scott and Pac-10 chief operating officer Kevin Weiberg spoke to officials from Oklahoma and Oklahoma State in Oklahoma City Saturday and are in College Station today to speak with Texas A&M officials, according to sources.

Texas had been resolute up to this point that if Nebraska left the conference, it would accept an invitation to join the Pac-10 and lead an exodus that appeared to include Oklahoma, Texas Tech and Oklahoma State.

Texas A&M has been in deep discussions with the SEC and as of Saturday night had enough votes on its Board of Regents to join the SEC (believed to be 6-3). But the dissenting votes on A&M's regents board are apparently passionate about keeping Texas and A&M together and not breaking up a 100-year rivalry by having the schools head to different leagues.

SEC commissioner Mike Slive was in College Station Saturday. Sources close to the situation say A&M has an invitation to the SEC if it wants it. The SEC has also been doggedly pursuing Oklahoma.

But thus far, OU, Texas Tech and Oklahoma State have indicated they would stay with Texas. Up to this point, that appeared to be an announcement to join the Pac-10, starting as early as Tuesday of this week.

But with news that Texas is now seriously considering the Beebe Plan, there is a growing chance the Big 12, which is now at 10 schools (the Big Ten, by the way, is now at 12 schools) just might survive after all.

Posted by biggsc
Member since Mar 2009
34663 posts
Posted on 6/13/10 at 1:00 pm to
Posted by Pedro
Geaux Hawks
Member since Jul 2008
38348 posts
Posted on 6/13/10 at 1:04 pm to
NO NO NO NO NOOOOO
Posted by Duckie
Tippy Toe, Louisiana
Member since Apr 2010
24314 posts
Posted on 6/13/10 at 1:05 pm to
Guess UT isn't as powerful as they thought they were.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
37128 posts
Posted on 6/13/10 at 1:06 pm to
if they want more money come to the SEC with OU, OSU, A&M, and Texas

If you want to be a regional brand then try to keep this together somehow
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
41044 posts
Posted on 6/13/10 at 1:06 pm to
I don't buy it. I don't buy the contract would jump by almost 100% after LOSING two teams.

I call Shenanigans.
Posted by TenTex
Member since Jan 2008
15949 posts
Posted on 6/13/10 at 1:07 pm to
This has caused a HUGE uproar in Texas politically. Congrats to A&M for not being UT's lapdog. I hope Slive can still convince A&M and Oklahoma to join the SEC. I'm thinking now everyone stays put. But if Missouri or Kansas bolt it's over.
This post was edited on 6/13/10 at 1:08 pm
Posted by Duckie
Tippy Toe, Louisiana
Member since Apr 2010
24314 posts
Posted on 6/13/10 at 1:08 pm to
I would love for UT to be the one left out in the cold.
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 6/13/10 at 1:09 pm to
This is silly and 100% being driven by a very worried Texas Longhorn program.
Posted by DallasTiger11
Los Angeles
Member since Mar 2004
13385 posts
Posted on 6/13/10 at 1:09 pm to
This is just Texas freaking out. They are realizing they don't have near as much power as they thought. They don't care about the Big 12, they wanted that Pac-10 deal so bad. But now in the final moments, with A&M going to the SEC and even Oklahoma wavering, Texas is nervous so now they act like they want to save the Big 12.
Posted by biggsc
Member since Mar 2009
34663 posts
Posted on 6/13/10 at 1:10 pm to
Posted by Twelve
New Orleans, LA
Member since Jun 2005
983 posts
Posted on 6/13/10 at 1:13 pm to
I don't care what team it is, no one university should have that much power over the rest of their conference.
Posted by angryslugs
Member since Apr 2008
11381 posts
Posted on 6/13/10 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

This is silly and 100% being driven by a very worried Texas Longhorn program.


this. and if A&M and OU stay and let texas get their own network they have even bigger vagina's than i thought.
Posted by woopiginaustin
Moderator
Member since Jun 2008
8590 posts
Posted on 6/13/10 at 1:14 pm to
THIS IS TEXAS' DREAM SCENARIO

1) No more Big12 Championship Game

2) An even more watered down conference/competition level

3) Their own 'UT TV Network'

Posted by TenTex
Member since Jan 2008
15949 posts
Posted on 6/13/10 at 1:14 pm to
I hope the Big 12 survives somehow. I think fewer super conferences is not good for any of the college sports. The PAC 10 will have Egg and continue to crumble with all of USC's problems.
Posted by Duckie
Tippy Toe, Louisiana
Member since Apr 2010
24314 posts
Posted on 6/13/10 at 1:15 pm to
I also LOOOOOOOVVVVEEEEEE how this is being "leaked" by orangebloods. Once again.


When will people wake up and realize that the AD for UT might as well write these articles.
Posted by GumboHed
Member since Nov 2004
111 posts
Posted on 6/13/10 at 1:16 pm to
Beautiful. This would make the Big 12 irrelevant unless they consider further expansion. Maybe they will make a run to get Arkansas back.
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 6/13/10 at 1:19 pm to
UT is really sorta embarrassing themselves at this point I think.
Posted by texastigerr
Texas
Member since Jan 2005
9191 posts
Posted on 6/13/10 at 1:23 pm to
Fine with me. If A&M comes that's fine. But I don't see how A&M coming to the SEC has any positive effect on LSU. As a matter of fact, I think it makes our recruiting job that much harder.
Posted by DudeofLSU
Member since Mar 2009
403 posts
Posted on 6/13/10 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

But if Missouri or Kansas bolt it's over.



Where would Missouri and Kansas bolt to??
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram