- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How this year's projected NFL 1st Rounders were ranked
Posted on 4/21/10 at 9:14 am to FootballNostradamus
Posted on 4/21/10 at 9:14 am to FootballNostradamus
actually its more like 20-25 nowhere near 50....and even if 20 of them pan out they between redshirting and coming out as juniors they dont all come from the same class...ppl are idiots with their logic, like is that guy claiming he would rather recruit nothing but 2 stars??
4
Posted on 4/21/10 at 9:16 am to X Carter Is Fast
plus there were more 5 stars on there than 2 stars anyway, so what is this dip shite talking about
Posted on 4/21/10 at 10:01 am to X Carter Is Fast
You guys can rip all you want, but the fact I was trying to get at is with recruiting, NO ONE KNOWS. Yes, OF COURSE there are more 2 and 3 star athletes out there. Who the hell would be stupid enough not to know this?
And also, who in their right f'ing mind would purposely recruit 2 and 3 star athletes if they had a chance to get 4 and 5 stars playrs? Coaches would be fired on the spot for this. There is a reason that these players are rated higher, and USUALLY those players turn out better.
The point I was trying to make was that so many kids get underrecruited and slip by the masses of scouts, that we as fans, should love to see when a kid comes from nowhere, and goes in the first round.
No, you asshats would rather point out the well known facts that "there are more 2 and 3 star players than". Blah Blah.
Thanks Captain Obvious.
And also, who in their right f'ing mind would purposely recruit 2 and 3 star athletes if they had a chance to get 4 and 5 stars playrs? Coaches would be fired on the spot for this. There is a reason that these players are rated higher, and USUALLY those players turn out better.
The point I was trying to make was that so many kids get underrecruited and slip by the masses of scouts, that we as fans, should love to see when a kid comes from nowhere, and goes in the first round.
No, you asshats would rather point out the well known facts that "there are more 2 and 3 star players than". Blah Blah.
Thanks Captain Obvious.
Posted on 4/21/10 at 10:18 am to X Carter Is Fast
quote:
would rather recruit nothing but 2 stars??
Worked out great for me!
Sincerely,
Slytanic Crooms
Posted on 4/22/10 at 1:50 pm to X Carter Is Fast
quote:
actually its more like 20-25 nowhere near 50
Rivals has ~25. Scout has 50.
Scout 300 - 2010
Just saying.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News