- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Whose Draft Stock Rising Will Help the Saints Most
Posted on 3/25/10 at 1:35 pm to blueslover
Posted on 3/25/10 at 1:35 pm to blueslover
quote:
So he'd be bench or move Nicks down which is needless.
Moving Nicks to RT, adding Iupati to guard would be great.
A) It improves the overall starting line performance as well as depth with Stinchy being the first to come off if a guard or tackle went down.
B) Makes us a more physical dominating line.
C) Gives us a little flexibility with Nicks and Evans both looking for big deals VERY shortly.
2
Posted on 3/25/10 at 1:49 pm to Chad504boy
Stinchcomb just made his first Pro Bowl and you wanna bench him?
Posted on 3/25/10 at 1:51 pm to Chad504boy
he's a quality player but
A) You may say Nicks to RT is great. Not great enough last year to do it and let Stinch walk. So at best, it would be an experiment into the unknown
Moving Stinch, an All Pro RT to the bench in the 2nd year of a fresh contract to try out an unproven guy doesn't seem like a great idea to me.
B) more physical perhaps, but that doesn't always equate to more dominating
C) agree on but plugging a front 7 D need would seem to accomplish more than providing future flexibility. Contract crossroads are perpetual. Running back money for '11 will be pivotal.
A) You may say Nicks to RT is great. Not great enough last year to do it and let Stinch walk. So at best, it would be an experiment into the unknown
Moving Stinch, an All Pro RT to the bench in the 2nd year of a fresh contract to try out an unproven guy doesn't seem like a great idea to me.
B) more physical perhaps, but that doesn't always equate to more dominating
C) agree on but plugging a front 7 D need would seem to accomplish more than providing future flexibility. Contract crossroads are perpetual. Running back money for '11 will be pivotal.
This post was edited on 3/25/10 at 1:54 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News