- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Most underperforming College FB program
Posted on 11/26/09 at 10:35 pm
Posted on 11/26/09 at 10:35 pm
Easy to say notre dame. But with the money, fan base and facilities they have, it is pathetic that Texas A&M has been irrelevant for 2 decades
Posted on 11/26/09 at 10:40 pm to xenythx
A&M, UCLA, Clemson, and UGA all need to be in the conversation.
With all of these, you have to look at the local talent that's available along with BCS conference membership, etc. Yes, they have competition within their conferences, but for what they've done, and for some of them, for the numbers they produce to the NFL, they should be doing much, much more.
With all of these, you have to look at the local talent that's available along with BCS conference membership, etc. Yes, they have competition within their conferences, but for what they've done, and for some of them, for the numbers they produce to the NFL, they should be doing much, much more.
Posted on 11/26/09 at 10:42 pm to AlexLSU
quote:
Colorado
They have to recruit nationally and have not been able to for a long time.
Posted on 11/26/09 at 10:46 pm to Sophandros
quote:
A&M, UCLA, Clemson, and UGA all need to be in the conversation.
Ridiculous.
2009 - 6-5
2008 - 10-3
2007 - 11-2 Sugar Bowl Champs
2006 - 9-4
2005 - 10-3 SEC Champs
2004 - 10-2
2003 - 11-3
2002 - 13-1 SEC Champs
Aside from the fact that their 2002 and 2007 teams didn't win national titles, they're basically on par with LSU.
Posted on 11/26/09 at 10:47 pm to AlexLSU
I'm on the fence about including Nebraska, but the may be back on the rise.
Posted on 11/26/09 at 10:47 pm to xenythx
A&M had a decent run in the 90's. I say Minnesota and Arizona State. Both big schools, albeit with mediocre recruiting bases.
Posted on 11/26/09 at 10:49 pm to Sophandros
quote:
A&M, UCLA, Clemson, and UGA
UGA doesn't belong in that list
Posted on 11/26/09 at 10:50 pm to Parliament
Yea before this year I definitely would have said Nebraska, but it's got to be UCLA.
Posted on 11/26/09 at 10:51 pm to WarhawkTiger6
Nebraska may have history but with their location, they're fortunate to win as much as they do.
UCLA is the definition of an under-achiever.
UCLA is the definition of an under-achiever.
Posted on 11/26/09 at 10:56 pm to Parliament
quote:
I say Minnesota and Arizona State. Both big schools, albeit with mediocre recruiting bases.
I say good call on both, because I was close to including both.
With Minn's new stadium, I think that'll give recruiting a huge boost.
ASU could be a power if they get a couple of winning seasons and/or USC falls. They have a very appealing area for recruits IMO. Huge metro area in Phoenix with lots to do and HOT HOT HOT bitches. Guys like Burfict going to ASU and doing well for himself as a Freshman might open the door for more guys. I think ASU is much more appealing than anything in the southern Pac-10 outside of USC.
Posted on 11/26/09 at 11:08 pm to AlexLSU
LSU in the 1990s. Currently UCLA, Texas A&M
Posted on 11/26/09 at 11:11 pm to BZ504
so far underperforming they are not on the map - Syracuse.....
Posted on 11/26/09 at 11:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
A&M, UCLA, Clemson, and UGA
UGA doesn't belong in that list
I wouldn't put Clemson on there either with who they have to contend with for recruits and the amount of blue chips in their vacenity.
Posted on 11/26/09 at 11:16 pm to LSUtoOmaha
quote:
I'm on the fence about including Nebraska, but the may be back on the rise.
Nah. Their recruiting just isn't good enough to compete with UT and OU. The main thing they have going for them is their weak division, so if they get to the Big XII CG pretty regularly, they could pull an upset or two.
Posted on 11/26/09 at 11:25 pm to Palm Beach Tiger
quote:
I wouldn't put Clemson on there either with who they have to contend with for recruits and the amount of blue chips in their vacenity.
Not a lot of competition in the Carolinas
Posted on 11/27/09 at 12:20 am to The Easter Bunny
FSU will be on this list within the next 5 years.
Posted on 11/27/09 at 12:22 am to AlexLSU
Ole miss shsould not be in this discussion.
Popular
Back to top


5






