- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Reggie Bush Questions
Posted on 11/2/09 at 8:57 pm
Posted on 11/2/09 at 8:57 pm
This doesn't require saints homers, so I put it here.
1. Is Reggie tradeable with his contract?
more questions to come
1. Is Reggie tradeable with his contract?
more questions to come
Posted on 11/2/09 at 8:58 pm to Ryan3232
Is there a good chance he does get moved this offseason?
Posted on 11/2/09 at 8:58 pm to Dodd
He really is an expendable player IMO. I say get some more good defensive players for him.
Posted on 11/2/09 at 9:00 pm to Gamer
Is it not good business sense for both he and the Saints to realize this, discuss it now, so that he can play up his value?
He just seems like he's a little more physical tonight.
He just seems like he's a little more physical tonight.
Posted on 11/2/09 at 9:00 pm to Dodd
No, he's not.
He'll be able to be cut next year, though.
He'll be able to be cut next year, though.
Posted on 11/2/09 at 9:10 pm to Charles Bronson
The Saints would be stupid to pay his contract next year. I am sure others owners know this.
Posted on 11/2/09 at 9:11 pm to Dodd
1 answer.
threat to take it to the house every time he touches the ball.
Posted on 11/2/09 at 9:21 pm to Charles Bronson
Bronson, do you mean at the end of next year or in the post-season after this year?
Posted on 11/2/09 at 9:22 pm to Keys Open Doors
quote:I believe with the uncapped year they can cut him without penalty. SFP has mentioned this before.
Bronson, do you mean at the end of next year or in the post-season after this year?
Posted on 11/2/09 at 9:22 pm to Dodd
Pretty sure he won't be traded but instead cut
Posted on 11/2/09 at 11:55 pm to The Easter Bunny
quote:
7/29/2006: Signed a six-year, $52.5 million contract. The deal contains $26.31 million guaranteed, including a $12.5 million option bonus in the second year and $9.5 million in incentives. 2009: $2.585 million (+ $4 million roster bonus), 2010: $8 million, 2011: $11.8 million, 2012: Free Agent. Cap charges: $12 million (2009), $13.5 million (2010).
Bush wont make $8 million with the Saints next year, but in a uncapped year he will get a new deal with the Saints.
Posted on 11/3/09 at 12:04 am to TigerintheNO
So if we cut him before the contract we have to pay him in full but get that salary cap money back?
Posted on 11/3/09 at 12:08 am to TigerintheNO
quote:
but in a uncapped year he will get a new deal with the Saints.
I hope so
Posted on 11/3/09 at 12:36 am to lsu xman
quote:
threat to take it to the house every time he touches the ball.
How many times has he?
Posted on 11/3/09 at 5:12 am to BoogerEater
Not nearly enough to justify the deal...
Posted on 11/3/09 at 5:50 am to lsu xman
quote:
threat to take it to the house every time he touches the ball.
Not this year.
Posted on 11/3/09 at 8:34 am to Lutcher Lad
quote:
Not nearly enough to justify the deal...
exactly!! I personally think we have to make something out of him to have any real trade value. As of right now no trade because he isn't worth trading right now.
Posted on 11/3/09 at 8:45 am to BoogerEater
I think we ask him to restructure his contract at the end of the year. I hope they don't trade or cut him.
Posted on 11/3/09 at 9:11 am to lsu xman
quote:
threat to take it to the house every time he touches the ball.
Or dance around trying to get a highlight reel run and take a 4-5 yard loss instead of putting his head down and settling for a 2-3 yard gain that the team needs.
Bottom line is that he was signed to the huge contract out of college because of his "potential" to take it to the house every time. Fact is, after 4 years in the league, his production compared to the other weapons on the field does not justify the large piece of the salary cap pie that he is getting. If anybody else on the team had the same numbers that he does, few people would have a problem understanding this.
Without a doubt the guy is talented. That does not mean that he deserves the lion's share of the salary allocated for the running game or the wide receivers. You can't honestly say that if you stripped the names off of the back of the jerseys and did not know who was on the field making the plays, that you would think-based on production alone- that he should be a top earner at either of those positions. The fact that he has 'BUSH' on the back of his jersey should not make a difference.
Popular
Back to top

5





