- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
As a commish, would you veto TO for Boldin straight up?
Posted on 10/21/09 at 8:18 am
Posted on 10/21/09 at 8:18 am
The team giving up Boldin is in last and the one getting Boldin is in 3rd.
8
Posted on 10/21/09 at 8:20 am to LSU1018
Looks like garbage to me.
Posted on 10/21/09 at 8:37 am to LSU1018
both aren't doing much, but it does sound fishy
Posted on 10/21/09 at 8:41 am to LSU1018
Depends. Does the owner who has Boldin really need a receiver this week? With Boldin possibly not playing and others possibly on bye, maybe he's desperate and the TO owner is just being smart. If the Boldin owner has enough receivers to fill out a starting roster without Boldin, I'd have to question the trade.
Posted on 10/21/09 at 8:46 am to BhamTigah
No the owner with Boldin still has plenty of WRs. His good WRs are still Desean Jackson, Vincent Jackson, and Ocho.
Posted on 10/21/09 at 8:54 am to LSU1018
In that case, there's no good reason for him to trade Boldin for TO IMHO.
This post was edited on 10/21/09 at 8:54 am
Posted on 10/21/09 at 8:54 am to LSU1018
TO is a free agent in my league as we speak. THat is a horrid trade. The guy giving up Boldin is a moron.
Posted on 10/21/09 at 9:17 am to LSU1018
veto, and lock their teams for 2 weeks, consequences/repercussions.
Side issue, is the guy in 3rd playing you this week?
Side issue, is the guy in 3rd playing you this week?
Posted on 10/21/09 at 9:27 am to Iona Fan Man
No, I don't actually know when we play. I was considering doing a vote within the league. Do yall think this is a good idea or not? I would veto it without question if Boldin was healthy but with Boldin hurt again, it could be a legit trade with obviously the person getting Boldin getting the better end.
Posted on 10/21/09 at 9:34 am to LSU1018
quote:
The team giving up Boldin is in last and the one getting Boldin is in 3rd.
For some reason I read this wrong the first time. It is an obvious collusion to help out the guy in third and the guy in last giving up on the season. I'd veto the shite out of this and be really pissed if it didn't go through.
Posted on 10/21/09 at 9:59 am to LSU1018
If it walks like a duck, and quacks like a... that trade is bullshite.
Posted on 10/21/09 at 10:30 am to LSU1018
the only thing i can see where it wouldn't be considered collusion is if the guy getting TO thinks that TO will be traded before the deadline. Other than that COLLUSION
Posted on 10/21/09 at 10:47 am to jojothetireguy
The deadline was last night
Posted on 10/21/09 at 10:56 am to LSUSportsR4me
I ended up vetoing the trade so the guy that was getting Boldin asked if he threw in Mike Bell or Reggie Bush with TO for Boldin if I would allow it. I told him that I would allow that one.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News