- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
28 weeks later
Posted on 6/22/09 at 10:35 pm
Posted on 6/22/09 at 10:35 pm
currently watching this movie and I've got to say it's a lot better than I was thinking it would be. I assumed it'd just be a crappy sequal, but this is almost better than the first.
Thoughts/opinions?
Thoughts/opinions?
7
Posted on 6/22/09 at 10:36 pm to BuckeyeFan87
A very solid sequel.
Some great scenes, the characters are a bit thin mostly, I would watch a third.
Some great scenes, the characters are a bit thin mostly, I would watch a third.
Posted on 6/22/09 at 10:39 pm to BuckeyeFan87
Yeah I thought it was pretty solid. I thought the first was far superior, but I'm also a big Danny Boyle fan.
Posted on 6/22/09 at 10:40 pm to Gooner
Great movie. I am looking forward to the third one.
Posted on 6/23/09 at 12:49 am to BuckeyeFan87
Great intro. Great production values. But just fell flat I thought. The Canary Wharf part was particularly nonsensical.
Posted on 6/23/09 at 1:10 am to lynxcat
quote:there's a 3rd coming?
Great movie. I am looking forward to the third one.
Posted on 6/23/09 at 1:51 am to BuckeyeFan87
It is a very good sequel. Not at all better than the first. The first is, IMO one of the best 'zombie movies' ever created. But this one is very good.
Posted on 6/23/09 at 7:04 am to Meursault
The first 15 minutes of that movie is my favorite horror movie scene of all time. The rest of the movie is just ok.
Posted on 6/23/09 at 7:15 am to adamsblueguitar
I need to rewatch this one...I've ehard so many things on here about how good it is. But all I remember about it when I first saw it was kind of a "at least it didn't suck" mentality.
I just remember it not being that good.
I just remember it not being that good.
Posted on 6/23/09 at 7:25 am to CocomoLSU
I enjoyed it, and it was a very solid sequel, but I can't say it's better than the first. It starts out fantastic, but then just kinda flatlines somewhere in the middle. I didn't care about the characters nearly as much as I did in the first one. Still, great zombie flick.
Posted on 6/23/09 at 8:19 am to BuckeyeFan87
Ya, those 2 movies are among my favorite movies, and can watch them over and over again ... something i usually don't do w movies.
Posted on 6/23/09 at 8:54 am to BuckeyeFan87
I haven't seen the first one in a while, so refresh my memory somebody...
was the first one as violent as this one? I mean, obviously the zombies killed people, but was it with as much distain as when the father smashes his thumbs through his wifes eyes?
was the first one as violent as this one? I mean, obviously the zombies killed people, but was it with as much distain as when the father smashes his thumbs through his wifes eyes?
Posted on 6/23/09 at 9:02 am to BuckeyeFan87
Didn't sleep good after watching it late one night on HBO
Posted on 6/23/09 at 9:47 am to BuckeyeFan87
quote:
was the first one as violent as this one?
I don't think so. I'm still hazy on the second one, but from what I can remember, it was zombies attacking a whole shitload of people running around.
In Days, it was more about the scare of the chase, and there were a LOT fewer people. But some of the attacks were pretty brutal.
quote:
father smashes his thumbs through his wifes eyes?
In the first one, Jim does the same thing to one of the soldiers I believe..
Posted on 6/23/09 at 11:19 am to CocomoLSU
That's true, forgot about that scene.
Yeah, the first one did seem more about the chase than the actual attack. I just couldn't remember if the attacks themselves were as burtal in the first as they were in the second(ie, the thumb thing and beating the female soldier in the throat with the gun repeatedly).
Yeah, the first one did seem more about the chase than the actual attack. I just couldn't remember if the attacks themselves were as burtal in the first as they were in the second(ie, the thumb thing and beating the female soldier in the throat with the gun repeatedly).
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News