Started By
Message
locked post

Super Regional vs Omaha

Posted on 5/29/09 at 9:20 pm
Posted by Gerard Allemand
Choupic, La
Member since Sep 2008
315 posts
Posted on 5/29/09 at 9:20 pm
I know a lot of discussion lately has been about 6game Regional vs the new Super Regional Format.

What I was thinking just now while watching the O'Reilly Factor (No Spin Zone), is that we should probably just stop Regionals. I say Omaha becomes a 16team Tourny but is played like the NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament. In that different regions host smaller Torney's making and meet in one place for a final four.

Would make going to Omaha mean more and more games played at college ball parks.

What you guys think?
Posted by ehidal1
Chief Boot Knocka
Member since Dec 2007
37141 posts
Posted on 5/29/09 at 9:21 pm to
If that was the case, last year's national champ Fresno State wouldn't have even made the tourney. I like the 64 team format. I think I like the 6 team regional a little better, but it shouldn't be cut down IMO.
Posted by bigpapamac
Mobile, AL
Member since Oct 2007
22382 posts
Posted on 5/29/09 at 9:22 pm to
Horrible, horrible idea. Only letting 16 teams compete is absurd.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
127033 posts
Posted on 5/29/09 at 9:35 pm to
quote:

16team Tourny
It's difficult enough to get flights into/out of Omaha, hotel rooms and tickets when there are only 8 teams. With 16 teams, it would be a nightmare.

They would have to move out of Omaha to accommodate 16 teams, IMO.
Posted by LSUzealot
Napoleon and Magazine
Member since Sep 2003
57656 posts
Posted on 5/29/09 at 10:13 pm to
please quit posting. k thx bye
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram