- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Chelsea's Gets Liquor License Back
Posted on 5/4/09 at 1:48 pm
Posted on 5/4/09 at 1:48 pm
Chelsea's Gets Liquor License Back for now.
The court found that Chelsea's was deprived of due process of law. Chelsea's gets the injunction back to serve alcohol. Fined $1500 in mean time.
Anybody up for a Beer?
The court found that Chelsea's was deprived of due process of law. Chelsea's gets the injunction back to serve alcohol. Fined $1500 in mean time.
Anybody up for a Beer?
2
Posted on 5/4/09 at 1:51 pm to DaddyFrogLegs
This happen today?
Posted on 5/4/09 at 1:52 pm to RidingForAFall
Yeah! They have been in court all morning. Been following the Twitter updates: Ilovechelseas.com Twitter Page
Its been kind of comical
Its been kind of comical
This post was edited on 5/4/09 at 1:54 pm
Posted on 5/4/09 at 3:56 pm to DaddyFrogLegs
quote:
Anybody up for a Beer?
not yet, say it may take up to 72 hours before they can resume serving alcohol.
Posted on 5/4/09 at 3:57 pm to rutiger
quote:
Anybody up for a Beer?
quote:
it may take up to 72 hours before they can resume serving alcohol
And my after-work plans just changed...
Posted on 5/4/09 at 4:01 pm to RidingForAFall
thats why i posted it 
Posted on 5/4/09 at 4:07 pm to rutiger
quote:Thanks bubba!!!! My debauchery will now take place at a different location. You, my friend, kick arse!
rutiger
Posted on 5/4/09 at 4:10 pm to DaddyFrogLegs
It seems that Remmetter lied about always selling more food than alcohol, which makes me feel dumb for taking up for him. He sold more alcohol in both 2007 and 2008. Oh well, it's still a good place that I wouldnt want to see go, because of retarded laws.
Posted on 5/4/09 at 4:11 pm to JFremani
I think he only sold more alcohol than food one year, and that was the year in which they changed locations and didn't expect the type of crowd/alcohol sales to be so drastic. And shouldn't their be some sort of change to the law when you have a single day like St. Patti's that allows your establishment to sell so much alcohol at a disproportionate rate?
If Ivar's is in compliance, Chelsea's should be as well. Ivar's sells like two hamburgers a week.
If Ivar's is in compliance, Chelsea's should be as well. Ivar's sells like two hamburgers a week.
This post was edited on 5/4/09 at 4:13 pm
Posted on 5/4/09 at 4:32 pm to Tiger Authority
Ivar's doesnt charge a cover. ATC apparently regulates cover charges, too!
Posted on 5/4/09 at 4:37 pm to JFremani
He needs a lesson from 99.9% of restaurant/bar/anybusinessthatdealswithcash owners on how to increase his food sales while lowering his alcohol sales. It's called HIDE THE FRIKKIN CASH MORON.
Posted on 5/4/09 at 4:45 pm to JFremani
quote:
Ivar's doesnt charge a cover. ATC apparently regulates cover charges, too!
But that's what I don't get. The cover and ID at the door starting at 10:30 or so seems like a practice that an organization like the ATC would be happy about. Isn't there role to curtail underage drinking? And isn't that basically what this does? Seems to me that the group just wants to go after Chelsea's. They get local bars in trouble for underage drinking, but when a restaurant that stays open till 2 wants to limit that practice the ATC revokes their liquor license. Strange.
Posted on 5/4/09 at 4:48 pm to Tiger Authority
Good news for BR. Great spot.
Posted on 5/4/09 at 5:15 pm to Tiger Authority
quote:
But that's what I don't get. The cover and ID at the door starting at 10:30 or so seems like a practice that an organization like the ATC would be happy about. Isn't there role to curtail underage drinking? And isn't that basically what this does? Seems to me that the group just wants to go after Chelsea's. They get local bars in trouble for underage drinking, but when a restaurant that stays open till 2 wants to limit that practice the ATC revokes their liquor license. Strange.
Thank you.
Posted on 5/4/09 at 6:36 pm to rutiger
quote:
not yet, say it may take up to 72 hours before they can resume serving alcohol.
Damn buracrats!
I want to drink there, NOW!
Posted on 5/4/09 at 8:25 pm to RidingForAFall
quote:
it may take up to 72 hours before they can resume serving alcohol
And my after-work plans just changed...
why not go there for dinner ?? i mean, it is a restaurant and all, right ?
Posted on 5/4/09 at 8:27 pm to Martini
quote:
It's called HIDE THE FRIKKIN CASH MORON.
which apparently the dumbass did in his ATC book audit, but didn't do in his state and parish sales and use tax reports .. i.e., they didn't add up ...
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News