- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Jackson is going to go down as the worst SC justice ever. Today's 8-1 ruling
Posted on 3/31/26 at 9:53 am
Posted on 3/31/26 at 9:53 am
7
Posted on 3/31/26 at 9:56 am to anc
quote:
BREAKING: In an 8-1 ruling, the Supreme Court announced this morning that Colorado’s ban on so-called conversion therapy violates First Amendment free speech rights. Gorsuch wrote the majority opinion. Jackson was the lone dissent.
“The First Amendment stands as a bulwark against any effort to prescribe an orthodoxy of views, reflecting a belief that each American enjoys an inalienable right to speak his mind and a faith in the free marketplace of ideas as the best means for finding truth,” the Court ruled. “Laws like Colorado’s, which suppress speech based on viewpoint, represent an egregious assault on both commitments.”
Posted on 3/31/26 at 9:57 am to anc
She seems like a follower. I'm mostly surprised she veered from the other zombies.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 9:59 am to anc
Jackson is the same as Massie; against Trump on every issue.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 9:59 am to anc
LGBTQ leftists often argue that gay people are born that way.
Their opposition to this law is an admission that the human mind can be programmed in either direction.
Humans are moist robots.
Their opposition to this law is an admission that the human mind can be programmed in either direction.
Humans are moist robots.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 10:01 am to anc
quote:
Colorado’s ban on so-called conversion therapy violates First Amendment free speech rights.
Wait - am I reading this wrong?
Is SCOTUS saying you must allow (cannot ban) 'conversion therapy" ??
doesn't ring true if Jackson is only dissent - seems to be backwards.
maybe I just don't understand SCOTUS-speak.
edit = disregard
following comment from X clears it up - for me anyway.
"To say a child can receive permanent and mutilating "gender affirming care", but that they cannot seek to change their mind, which is non-physical and reversible, is inconsistent of law and spirit, to say the least."
This post was edited on 3/31/26 at 10:07 am
Posted on 3/31/26 at 10:05 am to anc
I guess I do not understand the case, because 8-1 is really unanimous when the 1 is the retard on the bench. But . . . .
How is regulating a counselor's speech different from regulating a MD's or attorney's speech?
Doctor's have lost their medical licenses for speech that "harms" patients or falls below a standard of care. Similar thing for attorneys.
How is regulating a counselor's speech different from regulating a MD's or attorney's speech?
Doctor's have lost their medical licenses for speech that "harms" patients or falls below a standard of care. Similar thing for attorneys.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 10:10 am to anc
I knew the DEI DA was the dissenting vote as soon as a saw the count.
Maybe she just didn't understand the topic. She doesn't know what a woman is after all.
Maybe she just didn't understand the topic. She doesn't know what a woman is after all.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 10:10 am to ChineseBandit58
Colorado banned conversion therapy (Christian led therapy to help trannies overcome their mental illness)
The SC just said Colorado can't do it. The retard was the only dissent.
The SC just said Colorado can't do it. The retard was the only dissent.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 10:10 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
Is SCOTUS saying you must allow (cannot ban) 'conversion therapy" ??
“Therapy” as in counseling. Not surgery and drugs.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 10:13 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
The Court found that Colorado's 2019 law, which prohibited licensed mental health professionals from attempting to change a minor’s sexual orientation or gender identity, favored viewpoints that affirmed LGBTQ+ identities while banning those that did not.
quote:
The ruling in Chiles v. Salazar marks a significant legal victory for advocates who argued that such bans constitute viewpoint discrimination against therapists seeking to offer counseling aimed at reducing same-sex attractions or gender dysphoria in accordance with religious beliefs.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News