- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Andrew Kolvet just called Joe Kent out on his lies about asking questions on Charlie Kirk
Posted on 3/19/26 at 1:00 pm
Posted on 3/19/26 at 1:00 pm
Andrew and the boys are pissed.
Joe told Tucker that no one is allowed to ask questions about Charlie Kirk’s assassination.
Andrew said that is absolutely false and he is privy to information that he is not allowed to discuss.
The video starts at 1:50:10
https://rumble.com/v77c54g-the-big-mideast-gas-fire-mayor-mamdanis-wife-bolling-solomon-moynihan-marlo.html
Joe told Tucker that no one is allowed to ask questions about Charlie Kirk’s assassination.
Andrew said that is absolutely false and he is privy to information that he is not allowed to discuss.
The video starts at 1:50:10
https://rumble.com/v77c54g-the-big-mideast-gas-fire-mayor-mamdanis-wife-bolling-solomon-moynihan-marlo.html
This post was edited on 3/19/26 at 1:22 pm
5
Posted on 3/19/26 at 1:02 pm to loogaroo
What happened to Joe Kent?? Thought he was one of the good guy.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 1:06 pm to Kattail
There’s no good guys involved in politics right now. The expectation is that all politicians are dirty
Posted on 3/19/26 at 1:07 pm to loogaroo
Of course. Kent will be smeared just as Lt. Col Schuller was, as Edward Snowden was, Tony Bobulinski, the brave ones. Kent wanted Kirk assassination questions answered and investigated further. He didn’t accuse anyone (or any foreign nation) of anything. Kent is very level-headed and measured and had data points he wanted to look into more. He was not allowed.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 1:07 pm to Kattail
quote:
What happened to Joe Kent?? Thought he was one of the good guy.
He is. That’s why he will get smeared.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 1:08 pm to tigerlion
quote:
Kent wanted Kirk assassination questions answered and investigated further.
What questions?
The Egyptian Air Force questions?
Posted on 3/19/26 at 1:17 pm to the808bass
quote:
What questions? The Egyptian Air Force questions?
Unanswered questions that both the FBI and the DOJ stopped him (National Counterterrorism Center) from investigating further. Why stop that? He implied nothing other than he wanted more time and more access to be thorough.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 1:18 pm to loogaroo
Is Joe Kent the one that lost his wife in Syria?
Posted on 3/19/26 at 1:20 pm to tigerlion
quote:
Unanswered questions
Be more specific. You can’t. Because there’s no real unanswered questions. This is all a bunch of show ponies in front of a camera and you’re lapping it up like it’s a true crime production.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 1:21 pm to aubie101
quote:
Is Joe Kent the one that lost his wife in Syria?
Yes
Posted on 3/19/26 at 1:23 pm to tigerlion
quote:
Kent is very level-headed and measured and had data points he wanted to look into more. He was not allowed.
Umm watch the video: Starts at 1:50:10
https://rumble.com/v77c54g-the-big-mideast-gas-fire-mayor-mamdanis-wife-bolling-solomon-moynihan-marlo.html
Posted on 3/19/26 at 1:24 pm to Kattail
quote:
What happened to Joe Kent?? Thought he was one of the good guy.
I'm told that since he went to Iraq and his wife died over there, that all future acts must be forgiven and celebrated. You shouldn't even be asking this question if you love America.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 1:25 pm to the808bass
quote:
Be more specific. You can’t. Because there’s no real unanswered questions. This is all a bunch of show ponies in front of a camera and you’re lapping it up like it’s a true crime production.
Yep.
Andrew called him out for being a scumbag and using Charlie to get clicks.
If anyone knows everything surrounding Charlie's death, it's Andrew.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 1:28 pm to the808bass
quote:
Be more specific. You can’t. Because there’s no real unanswered questions.
Correct. I can’t. Just as you can’t say every question WAS answered or the DOJ and FBI are fully trustworthy.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 1:31 pm to loogaroo
Joe Kent once a racist facists right wing Nhazi to the new Leftard Qatari right wing hero
Posted on 3/19/26 at 1:32 pm to tigerlion
quote:
Just as you can’t say every question WAS answered or the DOJ and FBI are fully trustworthy.
Correct. The DOJ and the FBI aren’t fully trustworthy.
What’s the direct evidence that they have this case wrong? Be specific.
You’re making an invisible cat argument. “There’s an invisible cat in the chair.” “No, there’s nothing there.” “That’s exactly what we should expect when there’s an invisible cat in a chair.”
I’m perfectly willing to look at actual evidence. Not “something is off about Erika.” Not “Charlie texted me that he was going to be a Catholic and fight the next Jew he met.” Not “a 30-06 cannot be the gun that shot him because I hunt deer with a 30-06.” Real evidence.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 1:41 pm to the808bass
quote:
Correct. The DOJ and the FBI aren’t fully trustworthy. What’s the direct evidence that they have this case wrong? Be specific. You’re making an invisible cat argument. “There’s an invisible cat in the chair.” “No, there’s nothing there.” “That’s exactly what we should expect when there’s an invisible cat in a chair.” I’m perfectly willing to look at actual evidence. Not “something is off about Erika.” Not “Charlie texted me that he was going to be a Catholic and fight the next Jew he met.” Not “a 30-06 cannot be the gun that shot him because I hunt deer with a 30-06.” Real evidence.
Galaxy brained take on this stuff is that your brain has better uses than trying to figure out stuff like this when it’s not your responsibility. We never know the truth about these things.
I watched the first part of the Tucker - Kent interview and it seemed glowy to me. First time I’ve really thought that Tucker might be not who I thought he was.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 1:41 pm to tigerlion
quote:
Unanswered questions that both the FBI and the DOJ stopped him (National Counterterrorism Center) from investigating further. Why stop that? He implied nothing other than he wanted more time and more access to be thorough.
Because maybe, just maybe, all questions have been answered. We know who killed Charlie, how he did it, etc.
And the killer isn’t some MK-Uktra product. He is a furry who will be put to death in a few years.
Maybe the added conspiratorial bullshiite getting shut down by the FBI is what Mr Kent is confusing with “not investigating further.”
This post was edited on 3/19/26 at 1:42 pm
Posted on 3/19/26 at 1:46 pm to Earnest_P
quote:
Galaxy brained take on this stuff is that your brain has better uses than trying to figure out stuff like this when it’s not your responsibility.
And without some evidence that none of us are privy to, there’s no reason for our foreign intelligence service to investigate a murder in Utah.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 1:49 pm to Ten Bears
quote:
Maybe the added conspiratorial bullshiite getting shut down by the FBI is what Mr Kent is confusing with “not investigating further.”
Of course, Kent’s real play would have been to leak to the press that the foreign intelligence services had opened a super duper top secret investigation of Kirk’s death especially with regards to a country in the Middle East and we can’t say what country that is but maybe you can guess. And that it would be a super duper secret because we can’t make that country mad.
And the right wing Redditor wannabes would amplify that to the heavens. “The Jooos killed Charlie! Even our own government knowzzzzzz!”
frick that guy.
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News