Started By
Message

Advocates, lawmakers propose increased cigarette tax

Posted on 3/10/26 at 9:10 am
Posted by djmed
Member since Aug 2020
4000 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 9:10 am
going back to the well.

good lord. why not $10 per pack? why not $50? $100?

Advocates, lawmakers propose increased cigarette tax



(The Center Square) – Anti-tobacco advocates and state officials across the country are proposing an increased tax on cigarette packs.

The Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids published an annual report tracking the landmark 1998 Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement, a $206 billion settlement agreement between U.S. states and four major tobacco companies to settle lawsuits over smoking-related deaths.

The settlement is designed to fund anti-smoking initiatives in states across the country. However, the report found that many states are falling short of fully funding tobacco prevention programs. In fiscal year 2026, total state funding for programs allocated was 3.4% of the $21.7 billion set aside this year.


The campaign called on state legislatures to raise taxes on cigarette packs by $1.50 per pack. Advocates said this increase would generate $6 billion in new revenue to invest in programs that decrease tobacco use across the country.

The report comes as state legislatures across the country are considering tax increases on cigarette packs. In Utah, legislators are considering a bill that would raise the tax on cigarettes by $2 per pack. Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer also called for a $2 tax increase in the state’s 2027 budget.

“We know states are facing budget shortfalls because of the cuts into federal public health programs, including Medicaid,” said Vince Willmore, vice president of communications at the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. “So this is really a win-win solution for states.”

LINK
Posted by djmed
Member since Aug 2020
4000 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 9:12 am to
“The states have treated the tobacco settlement as a cookie jar that they can use to fund a whole bunch of different programs instead of using the funds as intended to reduce tobacco use,” Willmore said.

States across the country have used tobacco settlement funds for wildly different purposes than intended. In 2001, New York used $19 million in settlement funds to build a sprinkler system in a golf course. A California county once used the settlement funds to build a juvenile jail in 2002.
Posted by pizzathehut
west monroe
Member since Jul 2016
1347 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 9:12 am to
al Capone would be SO HAPPY
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
43213 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 9:13 am to
This doesn't work.

Never has, never will.
Posted by WoodCrafter
Member since Jan 2010
1235 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 9:26 am to
quote:

This doesn't work.

Never has, never will.


It is the same grift as global warming.
Posted by PeleofAnalytics
Member since Jun 2021
5311 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 9:36 am to
quote:

This doesn't work.

Never has, never will.


Depends what people think the intent of the tax is. If the intent was to curtail smoking, cigarette taxes are part of the reason we have less smoker per capita than we have had the last 100 years in the US. Poor idiots can't afford to smoke.
Posted by Oswald
South of the St. George Buffer Zone
Member since Aug 2011
4340 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 9:48 am to
quote:

quote:

This doesn't work.

Never has, never will.

It is the same grift as global warming.


Bingo:

quote:

Advocates said this increase would generate $6 billion in new revenue to invest in programs that decrease tobacco use across the country.


Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
43213 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

Depends what people think the intent of the tax is. If the intent was to curtail smoking, cigarette taxes are part of the reason we have less smoker per capita than we have had the last 100 years in the US. Poor idiots can't afford to smoke.

They'll find a way. Organized Crime will fill the void ... just as they did during Prohibition.

Nicotine is a more addictive drug than heroin and alcohol combined.
Posted by GeauxtigersMs36
The coast
Member since Jan 2018
13081 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 12:19 pm to
Do we really have to have anti smoking campaigns? Everyone know they are bad. Instead of spending money on anti smoking just use that money for Medicare if your budget is short.
Posted by Lynxrufus2012
Central Kentucky
Member since Mar 2020
19710 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 12:21 pm to
They don’t want to stop smoking because they get so much money from taxes.
Posted by LittleJerrySeinfield
350,000 Post Karma
Member since Aug 2013
11242 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 12:36 pm to
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
76106 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 12:38 pm to
They promote its evil then tie all kind of State funding to its sale. Then spend more money on advertising don’t buy it. Insanity.
Posted by prouddawg
Member since Sep 2024
8851 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 12:46 pm to
Remember the old Rush Limbaugh “Joe 6 pack caricature?” White dude standing around with a beer and a cigarette with a bullseye on his back?
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
12745 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 12:46 pm to
Good.
Posted by Bonkers119
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2015
11955 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

lawmakers propose increased cigarette tax


hopefully this means a tax increase on Vapes and Nicotine products like Zyn as well.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
73299 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 12:53 pm to
I quit smoking over 25 years ago, so I’ve not paid much attention to the cost of cigarettes since. But I did notice not long ago in a store they had Marlboro cartons priced at like $98.99. I was flabbergasted anyone would pay that for a freaking carton of smokes. I use to buy Camel filtered at the PX for like $3 a carton.
Posted by Macfly
BR & DS
Member since Jan 2016
10322 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 12:55 pm to
I think it's just revenue generation and booze is next.
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
12745 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 12:58 pm to
Cigarette smokers can frick off.
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
74688 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

I think it's just revenue generation and booze is next.

As smoking and drinking decreases among the masses, they have to increase taxes on those who still do it. The alcohol lobby's heads are on fire over the drinking trend in the US over the past several years.
Posted by Padme
Member since Dec 2020
9666 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

booze is next.


Not booze, but what booze leads to. DUI’s are a favorite target of the revenue generation crowd, and an easy target. Everyone thinks those evil drivers need to be obliterated, so why not make DUI’s $50k? $100k? And maybe the driver can join a chain gang for 5 years. Even 4cubs would be for harsh penalties for drunk driving, just so long as we release the African American rapist
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram