- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
NYPost - FCC taking a look at pro sports streaming TV deals, NFL especially
Posted on 2/26/26 at 4:31 am
Posted on 2/26/26 at 4:31 am
Posted on 2/26/26 at 4:46 am to Eurocat
The broadcasting has never been free.
It's always been paid for by the advertisers who pass the cost along in their products or directly by the viewer.
It's always been paid for by the advertisers who pass the cost along in their products or directly by the viewer.
Posted on 2/26/26 at 6:29 am to TrueTiger
Or they don't raise costs at all and just make money on the extra volume.
Posted on 2/26/26 at 6:57 am to Eurocat
That lovely anti-trust exemption comes with pesky strings attached to it.
Posted on 2/26/26 at 7:00 am to Eurocat
quote:
pro sports streaming
I saw a video this week about an MLB Team and how they are creating their own streaming avenue and unfortunately the money is not the same with the TV deal.
For instance they were getting nearly 40 million a year in a TV deal before the regional sports networks imploded.
Now with direct team streaming the subscription fees might bring in 5 million. Now the team would get to keep all the advertising revenue, but they also bear the cost of producing each game and paying talent in front and behind the camera. Plus you have the cost of streaming which isn’t cheap if you are having to stream to multiple devices and resolutions and keep archival content for on demand viewing.
Now Facebook and YouTube streaming is free for hosting, but no way are you going to generate the revenue needed to pay all the costs.
Too many variables at play now. With ad supported TV withering, and streaming not being as lucrative as it was made out to be, teams maybe forced to end broadcasting every game to get people back in the stands.
Now this isn’t the case in all markets or teams with a large fan base, you take the large markets where there is no shortage of advertisers lining up and potential subscribers. You probably could make the numbers work, but smaller teams with smaller fan bases good luck making the numbers work.
Posted on 2/26/26 at 7:30 am to Eurocat
I don't fundamentally understand the strategy. I am driving to a business meeting in Tennessee on a Sunday afternoon. I want to listen to the Saints game. I pull up WWL app on my phone. And it says there is an NFL blackout for me and I can't listen to it.
Why not? What do they want me to do? Seems like a zero cost way to get more listeners and gain more ad revenue. But instead I am supposed to pay hundreds of dollars a year to catch a few minutes of an NFL game a few times a year?
Why not? What do they want me to do? Seems like a zero cost way to get more listeners and gain more ad revenue. But instead I am supposed to pay hundreds of dollars a year to catch a few minutes of an NFL game a few times a year?
Posted on 2/26/26 at 7:35 am to Eurocat
The local team in your area will always been free on one of the ABC networks.
Posted on 2/26/26 at 7:46 am to TrueTiger
quote:
The broadcasting has never been free. It's always been paid for by the advertisers who pass the cost along in their products or directly by the viewer.
I can remember the dark days of Saints football when blackouts were common place. Sometimes a big advertiser would drop some coin to ensure the blackout was lifted and the Saints game could be televised and their ads run during the game.
Posted on 2/26/26 at 8:54 am to No Colors
quote:
I pull up WWL app on my phone. And it says there is an NFL blackout for me and I can't listen to it.
That’s there to protect the Titans network and their advertisers. If you’re listening to the Saints, then you’re not listening to the Titans and their advertisers can’t reach you.
Posted on 2/26/26 at 11:16 am to Tarps99
I have a hard time giving a shite when we live in a day where broadcasters both pay royally for broadcasting rights whilst at the same time owning and operating their own gambling services. It is a racket and it could all collapse under it's own weight for all I care.
Popular
Back to top
4








