- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Sierra Club Quietly Teams With ‘Conservative’ Groups to Block Louisiana Energy Projects
Posted on 2/22/26 at 9:27 am
Posted on 2/22/26 at 9:27 am
quote:
President Donald Trump and his Republican allies have made increased energy production a top priority, arguing it lowers prices for consumers and creates jobs for skilled workers.
Environmental activists like the Sierra Club disagree. They oppose new oil and gas production, LNG export terminals, pipelines, and virtually any other form of fossil fuel energy infrastructure.
In the lead-up to Louisiana’s 2026 state legislative session, which kicks off next month, the Sierra Club is leading a highly coordinated legal and advocacy campaign targeting LNG terminal development, pipelines and carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) projects, which have expanded in recent years to support the state’s growing manufacturing sector.
Over the past year, the Sierra Club has filed lawsuits in state and federal court trying to halt at least three LNG terminal development projects in Louisiana, which are projected to bring tens of billions in investment and thousands of construction jobs. They’ve had success: Last fall, a state judge issued an “unprecedented” ruling, striking down a key permit for Commonwealth LNG in Cameron Parish.
Yet newly unearthed evidence shows that the Sierra Club has now quietly expanded its Louisiana campaign, cultivating and coordinating with the leadership of newer “conservative” advocacy groups in the state, most notably Save My Louisiana (SML).
Founded last summer, the leaders of Save My Louisiana call themselves “conservative” and claim to support oil and gas development. Yet it appears these leaders are working directly with anti-fossil fuel organizers like the Sierra Club, the pipeline protest group Bold Alliance, and other extreme opponents of energy development to oppose CCS projects in the state.
quote:
SML’s President, Allen Parish Police Juror Roland Hollins, has highlighted Savant’s importance to their campaign, calling her “the woman behind the curtain” on strategy. “Your voice helped wake up communities across Louisiana,” said Hollins. “We couldn’t have done it without you.”
State energy investment and infrastructure groups have said they’re unsurprised by the team-up between the Sierra Club and the leaders of Save My Louisiana.
As Desiree Lemoine, Executive Director of the Baton Rouge-based trade group Industry Makes, told InsideSources: “These national groups are pumping millions into Louisiana to stop energy infrastructure and development here, following their typical playbook of lawsuits and misleading messages, putting at risk hundreds of thousands of good-paying jobs as well as Louisiana’s pursuit of energy dominance and security.”
In December, Republican Gov. Jeff Landry, a strong supporter of energy and industrial development in the state, told E&E News he believes the leaders of Save My Louisiana have been “hookwinked by the radical left.”
“The men behind that political organization have built their entire careers on the back of the oil and gas industry,” Landry said. “They claim to be pro-industry, but they are preventing our state from leading America’s energy dominance – and threatening the Louisiana economy and way of life. Sadly, they have been manipulated into becoming the mouthpiece of the well-known anti-oil and gas financiers Mike Bloomberg and George Soros.”
LINK
Posted on 2/22/26 at 9:31 am to ragincajun03
quote:
Sadly, they have been manipulated into becoming the mouthpiece of the well-known anti-oil and gas financiers Mike Bloomberg and George Soros.”
They are being paid not manipulated.
Posted on 2/22/26 at 10:18 am to ragincajun03
I hope they succeed. The rush for more energy is tied directly to future data centers. Look at how well that turned out for Virginia. Utilities have doubled for homeowners
quote:
Virginia’s Gov. Spanberger Targets Energy Costs as Power Demand Surges
Posted on 2/22/26 at 10:26 am to ragincajun03
quote:
and carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) projects
If you have to change the name of your cause because it becomes the butt of jokes when reality proves contrary to it, you might want to re-think the junk science used as a basis for your cause. No one has had to rename childhood leukemia, for example.
The term "carbon capture and sequestration" is just a repackaging and re-branding of "carbon credits" and every bit as much a scam. When the tax credits stop for this, the whole program dies because there's no profit and no benefit.
quote:
As Desiree Lemoine, Executive Director of the Baton Rouge-based trade group Industry Makes, told InsideSources: “These national groups are pumping millions into Louisiana to stop energy infrastructure and development here,As Desiree Lemoine, Executive Director of the Baton Rouge-based trade group Industry Makes, told InsideSources: “These national groups are pumping millions into Louisiana to stop energy infrastructure and development here
horseshite. CCS does not create energy, it uses it. The only reason it's tied into energy at all is because energy companies can get shitloads of tax credits by capturing their CO2 emissions, liquifying them, drilling a deep hole and then pouring it into the ground where it remains geologically locked... until it doesn't.
From the article:
quote:
The agribusiness company — which typically sends 2,000 metric tons of CO2 underground per day at the site in Decatur
If this is a point-source capture facility (like what another company is planning for Caldwell parish), that's $85/ton. Averaging 2k tons per day over a full year is roughly $62M per year in tax credits.
Were the 45Q tax credits to stop today, every single one -Every. Single. One.- of these projects would halt and that should tell you everything you need to know about how it's tied into "energy infrastructure and development".
I'm not a fan of the Sierra Club, but I am a fan of stopping global warming alarmists from fricking up the land and the economy through the spread of their junk science. If our views align on this lone subject, then so be it.
Posted on 2/22/26 at 11:01 am to Bard
quote:
Were the 45Q tax credits to stop today, every single one -Every. Single. One.- of these projects would halt and that should tell you everything you need to know about how it's tied into "energy infrastructure and development".
Completely agree.
But this came about, and I'm sure you're aware of what I'm about to say because you seem to be one of the most informed posters on here, because the at the time Biden Admin EPA was cracking down on O&G and petrochem companies threatening to revoke their "license" to operate if they didn't reduce their emissions. Of course, methane was the real "greenhouse" gas, but CO2 was targeted because that's easier.
So...industry said, "Fine, but that means the cost of our product will have to rise X to do this", and the Biden Administration knew that wouldn't work for the voters. The compromise was that industry would employ these costly techniques in exchange for tax credits. And the Trump Administration has yet to repeal those credits.
Posted on 2/22/26 at 11:03 am to RobbBobb
quote:
I hope they succeed.
I do too.
But the Trump Administration and Landry Administration are trying to stay far away from this subject. It's weird.
Posted on 2/22/26 at 11:13 am to ragincajun03
Exactly. This came about because of the Biden administration carrying water for global warming acolytes looking for a sacrificial virgin and power companies realized they were on deck.
Trump has come out against the whole junk science of global warming, but has yet to do anything about CCS.
Trump has come out against the whole junk science of global warming, but has yet to do anything about CCS.
Posted on 2/22/26 at 11:17 am to Bard
quote:
Trump has come out against the whole junk science of global warming, but has yet to do anything about CCS.
Because there's been BILLIONS invested in the CCS sam shite, and many of those billions have come from the same industry he campaigned to support.
He can't yank that rug out from under them, and understandably, so here we are.
Posted on 2/22/26 at 11:23 am to ragincajun03
The MO of the Sierra Club is...INFILTRATION. Nothing more.
They are baddies.
They are baddies.
Posted on 2/22/26 at 11:31 am to Bard
quote:
The term "carbon capture and sequestration" is just a repackaging and re-branding of "carbon credits" and every bit as much a scam. When the tax credits stop for this, the whole program dies because there's no profit and no benefit.
This. Another propaganda scam by the European Marxist.
Posted on 2/22/26 at 11:52 am to ragincajun03
quote:
And the Trump Administration has yet to repeal those credits.
Yep. They even carved it out of the BBB. Sounds like some have some serious money riding on this.
Posted on 2/22/26 at 11:56 am to ragincajun03
quote:
But the Trump Administration and Landry Administration are trying to stay far away from this subject. It's weird.
Landry needs the CC to happen because a few other industrial projects want the tax credits to locate here. It's helping Landry attract business. Even though it's bullshite.
Posted on 2/22/26 at 12:07 pm to Bard
quote:
The term "carbon capture and sequestration" is just a repackaging and re-branding of "carbon credits" and every bit as much a scam.
^^^This^^^
Posted on 2/22/26 at 12:54 pm to La Place Mike
quote:
Mike Bloomberg and George Soros.”
If we could get these two pieces of shite to oppose the Pogey industry in Louisiana, we might have something.
Posted on 2/22/26 at 2:00 pm to loogaroo
quote:
Landry needs the CC to happen because a few other industrial projects want the tax credits to locate here. It's helping Landry attract business. Even though it's bullshite.
And it gives him a counter for supporting the trial lawyer $700 Million lawsuit against Chevron.
Popular
Back to top
4









