- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Who has jurisdiction to prosecute this border patrol agent?
Posted on 1/24/26 at 8:16 pm
Posted on 1/24/26 at 8:16 pm
I'll hang up and listen.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 8:19 pm to hogcard1964
quote:
The Feds
quote:
The Feds, cut and dry!
Thought so.
Thanks both of you.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 8:20 pm to loogaroo
The state can prosecute a federal agent.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 8:20 pm to loogaroo
The feds. And they have already said ICE has complete immunity so I guess that includes Border Patrol too.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 8:21 pm to SelaTiger
quote:
And they have already said ICE has complete immunity
Well, that was an inaccurate statement.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 8:21 pm to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
The state can prosecute a federal agent.
Not for on the job incidents. Which this clearly was. Feds have complete control over what happens.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 8:23 pm to SelaTiger
So if a CBP agent is driving drunk and kills someone while technically on duty, only the Feds can prosecute?
Posted on 1/24/26 at 8:34 pm to SelaTiger
quote:
Not for on the job incidents.
They absolutely can.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 8:42 pm to the808bass
quote:
So if a CBP agent is driving drunk and kills someone while technically on duty, only the Feds can prosecute?
yes jethrine, if on duty that is correct it would be up to the federal government to prosecute that agent. i'm assuming they would.
it always amazing to me how stupid you people are.
This post was edited on 1/24/26 at 8:45 pm
Posted on 1/24/26 at 8:44 pm to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
The state can prosecute a federal agent.
Nope, and your side of the aisle is responsible for that.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 8:44 pm to the808bass
quote:
So if a CBP agent is driving drunk and kills someone while technically on duty, only the Feds can prosecute?
You’re smarter than this
Posted on 1/24/26 at 8:46 pm to the808bass
quote:
So if a CBP agent is driving drunk and kills someone while technically on duty, only the Feds can prosecute?
Were these agents drunk while killing someone?
Posted on 1/24/26 at 9:04 pm to Warboo
quote:
Were these agents drunk while killing someone?
No. I’m making a rather clear point that if a law enforcement officer breaks a law while on the clock that they can be prosecuted for it.
The immunity that an officer would have is based on his actions being necessary and proper to carrying out his federal function. I’m sure that’s what his legal argument would be. It’s not an immunity from prosecution.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 9:07 pm to the808bass
quote:
No. I’m making a rather clear point that if a law enforcement officer breaks a law while on the clock that they can be prosecuted for it. The immunity that an officer would have is based on his actions being necessary and proper to carrying out his federal function. I’m sure that’s what his legal argument would be. It’s not an immunity from prosecution.
Well sure. What is your point other than the obvious.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 9:11 pm to the808bass
quote:
It’s not an immunity from prosecution.
If the DOJ declines, it appears it's over. That's why I started this thread. I would like to know that answer.
Posted on 1/24/26 at 9:16 pm to Warboo
quote:
What is your point other than the obvious.
I think it’s pretty obvious. Are you practicing at being obtuse?
Posted on 1/24/26 at 9:20 pm to the808bass
So DOJ refuses, and they get pardoned. Are we done?
Posted on 1/24/26 at 9:22 pm to loogaroo
It’s Federal, period. Don’t expect any prosecution.
Popular
Back to top


9






