- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Some credit to Loomis: revisiting trades this year
Posted on 12/24/25 at 11:32 am
Posted on 12/24/25 at 11:32 am
- Godchaux, we gave up a 7th
-Saunders for Fortner
- Vele, we gave up a 4th and 7th
- Asim Richards,we gave a 6 and got a 7th
- Ja’lynn Polk we gave up a 6 and got a 7th
- Shaheed, we got a 4th and 5th
- Penning, we got a 7th
- Godchaux has been pretty mediocre
- Fortner has been a godsend with McCoy being out, he’s earned himself a lot of $
- Richards has played well in a reserve role, good depth for cheap
- Vele looks legit and could be a key weapon for the future for cheap
- Polk, we’ll see next year
- good value for Shaheed and good assets to continue rebuild
- just glad to get rid of Penning
-Saunders for Fortner
- Vele, we gave up a 4th and 7th
- Asim Richards,we gave a 6 and got a 7th
- Ja’lynn Polk we gave up a 6 and got a 7th
- Shaheed, we got a 4th and 5th
- Penning, we got a 7th
- Godchaux has been pretty mediocre
- Fortner has been a godsend with McCoy being out, he’s earned himself a lot of $
- Richards has played well in a reserve role, good depth for cheap
- Vele looks legit and could be a key weapon for the future for cheap
- Polk, we’ll see next year
- good value for Shaheed and good assets to continue rebuild
- just glad to get rid of Penning
This post was edited on 12/24/25 at 11:39 am
Posted on 12/24/25 at 11:35 am to Lsujacket66
The Richards and Polk trades were pick swaps - player and a 6th for a 7th, not a 6th and a 7th. So basically nothing.
Posted on 12/24/25 at 11:37 am to Burt Macklin
quote:
The Richards and Polk trades were pick swaps - player and a 6th for a 7th, not a 6th and a 7th. So basically nothing.
You’re right, read it wrong on Pro football reference
Posted on 12/24/25 at 11:38 am to Lsujacket66
Will be praying someone really wants our 8-10 pick for their late teens pic lol
Lots of good DTs, CBs, DE and Olineman.
Lots of good DTs, CBs, DE and Olineman.
Posted on 12/24/25 at 11:40 am to goatmilker
quote:
Will be praying someone really wants our 8-10 pick for their late teens pic lol Lots of good DTs, CBs, DE and Olineman.
I really like some of the DTs that should be available in the late first/early 2nd
Posted on 12/24/25 at 11:43 am to Lsujacket66
quote:
Vele, we gave up a 4th and 7th
25 rec, 293 yds, 2 TDs
quote:
Shaheed, we got a 4th and 5th
57 rec, 677 yds, 2 TDs
Thank you Mickey!! Out here playing chess
Posted on 12/24/25 at 11:44 am to Lsujacket66
Was hoping Gods had two more years but I don't see it next year. We need a run dominate DT badly.
Posted on 12/24/25 at 11:48 am to High Life
quote:
Thank you Mickey!! Out here playing chess
You could have had Pickens for a 3rd and his numbers are better than both combined. And you solve our #1 receiver problem.
We trade a 4th for Vele and I’m still seeing threads that people want to draft a receiver in the first….
Posted on 12/24/25 at 11:55 am to Townedrunkard
quote:
You could have had Pickens for a 3rd
Muh tank! He’s a UFA genius. Wanna give up a third and have to pay him, or give up a third and he signs elsewhere?
Posted on 12/24/25 at 11:57 am to High Life
quote:
Thank you Mickey!! Out here playing chess
Re Shuck
Posted on 12/24/25 at 12:01 pm to High Life
Shaheed has 13 catches for 178 since he left.
We needed a big body wr
We needed a big body wr
Posted on 12/24/25 at 12:02 pm to Proximo
Not to mention, Pickens is a complete head case
Would have been an awful trade
Would have been an awful trade
Posted on 12/24/25 at 12:08 pm to Townedrunkard
quote:
You could have had Pickens for a 3rd and his numbers are better than both combined. And you solve our #1 receiver problem.
Another clueless team building post from town. You dont pay top 5 wr money to a wr. Especially on a rebuilding team.
quote:
We trade a 4th for Vele and I’m still seeing threads that people want to draft a receiver in the first….
Because hitting on a wr on a rookie contract is how you stay competitive without hamstringing your cap.
This is 101 stuff bud.
Posted on 12/24/25 at 12:11 pm to High Life
Vele had three years of control left for cheap. Shaheed is an UFA next year and is going to make 25m+ per year.
Posted on 12/24/25 at 12:23 pm to Townedrunkard
Pickens is a free agent after this season and will want WR1 money. He’s a head-case and giving him that much money is bound to blow up in our face. Would much rather have Vele on a rookie contract for two more years and draft a WR1 this year or next.
Posted on 12/24/25 at 12:23 pm to Townedrunkard
quote:
We trade a 4th for Vele and I’m still seeing threads that people want to draft a receiver in the first….
How many WR’s are on the field on any given play?
Posted on 12/24/25 at 12:51 pm to goatmilker
quote:
Will be praying someone really wants our 8-10 pick for their late teens pic lol Lots of good DTs, CBs, DE and Olineman.
That would be ideal but Mickey would eat razor blades sooner than he’d trade down.
Posted on 12/24/25 at 1:40 pm to Lsujacket66
Can anyone confirm if this is accurate for 2026?
It looks like Saints have 1,2,3,5,6 of their own picks and a 7th from the patriots?
As of now is that accurate?
It looks like Saints have 1,2,3,5,6 of their own picks and a 7th from the patriots?
As of now is that accurate?
Posted on 12/24/25 at 1:42 pm to DamageInc
CKM will have a major say in the draft and in FAs. Even the Loomis needs Moore to succeed.
Popular
Back to top

9











