Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Standing Rib Roast. Smoke With The Bones Tied Or Without The Bones?

Posted on 12/23/25 at 3:46 pm
Posted by Earthquake 88
Mobile
Member since Jan 2010
3321 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 3:46 pm
I bought two 10 pound standing rib roast. I’ve only smoked a few of these because my family prefers less fatty cuts of beef. I want to change things up this year because we just smoked a tenderloin about 2 months ago.

In the past I smoked the standing rib roast with the bones tied on by the butcher. Presentation wise it looks nice. However, I got to thinking would I get a better finished product if I untied the things and took the bones out of there and I tied it back up?
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora
Member since Sep 2012
73310 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 4:10 pm to
I watched Heath Riles do this today on YouTube. Bone in, frenched the bones for presentation. And tied it, but his was whole, still unsure why he needed the butcher twine.

Posted by tiger rag 93
KCMO
Member since Oct 2007
2935 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 4:23 pm to
I’m not smoking mine, but plan on removing the bones and roasting them then making a stock. Will tie up the boneless roast for an even cook. I think either way is fine.
Posted by BigDropper
Member since Jul 2009
8419 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

standing rib roast with the bones tied on by the butcher.
This is preferred because after it's cooked you just cut the strings and have s boneless rib roast that's easy to carve. Don't waste the bones, wrap them in foil and continue cooking until they're tender. That's the chef's reward for cooking.

Another tip is to rotate the roast so that the spinalis is adjacent to the bone. This protects it from over cooking.
Posted by Earthquake 88
Mobile
Member since Jan 2010
3321 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 5:03 pm to
I like Heath Riles. Love his various BBQ seasonings. I actually have watched that video. Had I gotten the thing with the bone in instead of already removed I would have french the ribs like he did.

I may untie the thing so I can season all 4 sides then I guess tie it back. I’m trying to figure out if tying the bones up truly helps the cook. To me it looks more like a presentation thing. I almost think I can cook the ribs separately.
Posted by BoogaBear
Member since Jul 2013
7021 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

This is preferred because after it's cooked you just cut the strings and have s boneless rib roast that's easy to carve. Don't waste the bones, wrap them in foil and continue cooking until they're tender. That's the chef's reward for cooking.


Don't do this. You will end up with a standing rib roast that you just removed literally half of the crust from.

Untie it, take the bones off, cook those separately. We cut the meat off of it and use it for stew meat or grind it for burgers.

Cook it boneless if the bones are already cut off.
Posted by calcotron
Member since Nov 2007
10116 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 5:16 pm to
I have left them on and it's fine, but the rib meat always needs more cooking anyway to get all tendered up, so separate makes sense. I will probably do that tomorrow. That way the roast piece is done quicker, has more crust as mentioned, and I can just leave the bones on until I think they are done. It does look cooler with the bones on, but that lasts 10 seconds before I'm popping strings and slicing.
Posted by BigDropper
Member since Jul 2009
8419 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

Don't do this. You will end up with a standing rib roast that you just removed literally half of the crust from.
never had that problem.
Posted by Lanelsu83
Member since Dec 2025
111 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 6:28 pm to
quote:

two 10 pound standing rib roast


spending $400 on one entree is wild.
Posted by BoogaBear
Member since Jul 2013
7021 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 6:50 pm to
quote:

never had that problem.


If the bones are already cut off and just tied back on you will definitely have the problem if you don't separate them during cooking. Which I believe is the case here.

That's how Publix packages their standing rib roast. Which is also 9.99 lb right now so not 400 dollars.
Posted by Earthquake 88
Mobile
Member since Jan 2010
3321 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 7:30 pm to
quote:

spending $400 on one entree is wild.


It’s only cost $200. They are very nice looking, I have 12 people coming to dinner for Christmas, so for $9.99 per pound at Publix, that’s a pretty great deal in my opinion.
Posted by kayjay
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
442 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 7:45 pm to
I smoke mine bone on. So much flavor comes from the bone.
Posted by Earthquake 88
Mobile
Member since Jan 2010
3321 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 7:46 pm to
quote:

Untie it, take the bones off, cook those separately. We cut the meat off of it and use it for stew meat or grind it for burgers.


I’m going to untie them and have a closer look at how much meat is in between those bones. The dinosaur ribs I’ve always cooked have to be smoked like a brisket. I’m sure these have far less meat, but still the same, I want a closer look. Just makes sense to season all four sides of the roast and have a nice crust all the way around.
Posted by lsushelly
Denham Springs
Member since Aug 2006
3642 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 8:43 pm to
Two 10 pounders?! shite you can’t hide money
Posted by BigDropper
Member since Jul 2009
8419 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 10:19 pm to
quote:

If the bones are already cut off and just tied back on you will definitely have the problem if you don't separate them during cooking.
no I won't. Never have, never will.
Posted by BoogaBear
Member since Jul 2013
7021 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 10:38 pm to
quote:

no I won't. Never have, never will.


Admittedly, you know a lot more than I about food and cooking.

That being said, can you go ahead and run me down how you're going to get a crust UNDER the bones that have been separated then tied back on effectively shielding the meat under them from the direct heat.

Genuinely curious since you said you've never and will never have that issue, I may be missing something.
Posted by Earthquake 88
Mobile
Member since Jan 2010
3321 posts
Posted on 12/24/25 at 12:00 am to
quote:

I smoke mine bone on. So much flavor comes from the bone.


I can agree with you if the bones have not been removed then tied back on to the bottom of the roast. I just don’t understand how a roast sitting on top of bones then tied together will add flavor. Bone in ribeye 2” thick is one of my favorite steaks. If the butcher cut that bone out then tied it back on I just don’t see how I’d get the same bone in taste.

I honestly think the bones tied back on to the roast are most probably for a presentation type reason.
Posted by Earthquake 88
Mobile
Member since Jan 2010
3321 posts
Posted on 12/24/25 at 12:03 am to
quote:

Two 10 pounders?! shite you can’t hide money


They were on sale for $9.99 LB. I’m sure Publix are selling them as a loss leader expecting you to buy other items in the store that are profitable.
Posted by BigDropper
Member since Jul 2009
8419 posts
Posted on 12/24/25 at 1:10 pm to
First of all you replied
quote:

Don't do this. You will end up with a standing rib roast that you just removed literally half of the crust from.
to my statement that deboning and retying the roast to the bones was the preferred method.

Your statement that [half of the crust would be removed.] is a gross over-exaggeration of the truth. After deboning an retying the roast to the bones, 1/4 to 1/3 of the otherwise exposed surface would be covered by the bone. That's way less than the half that you claimed would be lost.

Here's an image of the roast I did last night. Pay particular attention to the red line. Thats the portion of the roast that is adjacent to the bone. Now look at the green line. That's the part of the roast that is exposed to air and will brown,forming a crust. Notice that the green line is longer than the red line. Therefore half of the crust will not be removed cooking it the way I recommended.



In conclusion, never have I had the problem of removing half of the crust from a rib roast by deboning and retying it to the bones. Never have, never will...
Posted by CastleBravo
Rapid City, SD
Member since Sep 2013
1176 posts
Posted on 12/24/25 at 7:40 pm to
Never remove those bones.

Smoke with them and then remove them before serving.

Keep those for yourself the next day. The best part.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram