- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Pfizer mRNA Found in Over 88% of Human Placentas- including unvaccinated
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:13 am
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:13 am
BREAKING STUDY: Pfizer mRNA Found in Over 88% of Human Placentas, Sperm, and Blood — and in 50% of Unvaccinated Pregnant Women
For years, the public was told a simple story: the mRNA “stays in the arm,” degrades within hours, never enters the bloodstream, never crosses the placenta, never reaches the reproductive system, and certainly cannot be shed or transferred to others. These claims were repeated endlessly by agencies, fact-checkers, news outlets, and medical institutions, despite the fact that no long-term human biodistribution studies had ever been performed.
A new peer-reviewed study published in Annals of Case Reports titled, Detection of Pfizer BioNTech Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccine in Human Blood, Placenta and Semen, ends that narrative.
Researchers from Bar-Ilan University and several Israeli medical centers used nested PCR combined with Sanger sequencing—a far more sensitive and specific method than the standard qPCR used in earlier studies—to test for Pfizer mRNA in human tissues from 34 participants, including 22 pregnant women, 4 male sperm donors (8 samples), and 8 additional adults.
Their findings are deeply worrisome: 88% of pregnant women vaccinated within the last 100 days showed detectable Pfizer mRNA in both blood and placental tissue. Among male sperm donors, 100% of those who produced sperm had vaccine mRNA in their sperm cells, and 50% had it detectable in seminal fluid—long after vaccination.
Even more concerning, Pfizer mRNA was detected in 50% of the unvaccinated women tested —two in both placenta and blood, and one in blood alone; a result that forces the scientific community to confront the reality of shedding, something officials categorically deny.
Most striking of all, mRNA was still present in 50% of individuals more than 200 days after injection.
This is the clearest evidence to date that the injection does not degrade “within hours”—but instead persists, circulates, and deposits into human reproductive and fetal tissues.
The implications are enormous.
For years, the public was told a simple story: the mRNA “stays in the arm,” degrades within hours, never enters the bloodstream, never crosses the placenta, never reaches the reproductive system, and certainly cannot be shed or transferred to others. These claims were repeated endlessly by agencies, fact-checkers, news outlets, and medical institutions, despite the fact that no long-term human biodistribution studies had ever been performed.
A new peer-reviewed study published in Annals of Case Reports titled, Detection of Pfizer BioNTech Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccine in Human Blood, Placenta and Semen, ends that narrative.
Researchers from Bar-Ilan University and several Israeli medical centers used nested PCR combined with Sanger sequencing—a far more sensitive and specific method than the standard qPCR used in earlier studies—to test for Pfizer mRNA in human tissues from 34 participants, including 22 pregnant women, 4 male sperm donors (8 samples), and 8 additional adults.
Their findings are deeply worrisome: 88% of pregnant women vaccinated within the last 100 days showed detectable Pfizer mRNA in both blood and placental tissue. Among male sperm donors, 100% of those who produced sperm had vaccine mRNA in their sperm cells, and 50% had it detectable in seminal fluid—long after vaccination.
Even more concerning, Pfizer mRNA was detected in 50% of the unvaccinated women tested —two in both placenta and blood, and one in blood alone; a result that forces the scientific community to confront the reality of shedding, something officials categorically deny.
Most striking of all, mRNA was still present in 50% of individuals more than 200 days after injection.
This is the clearest evidence to date that the injection does not degrade “within hours”—but instead persists, circulates, and deposits into human reproductive and fetal tissues.
The implications are enormous.
5
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:14 am to Placekicker
Methods: Why This Study Succeeds Where Others Failed
One of the strongest aspects of this paper is the methodology. Where previous studies failed to detect vaccine mRNA, the authors explain exactly why: they were using qPCR, which lacks the sensitivity to detect low-abundance RNA months after injection. The new study instead used nested PCR, a two-step amplification technique that dramatically increases sensitivity and specificity, followed by Sanger sequencing, which literally reads the amplified sequence and confirms it matches the Pfizer construct. Each positive result was only considered valid if it appeared in at least three of four independent technical repeats, further reducing any chance that background noise or accidental contamination was driving the findings.
This approach is also fundamentally different from the PCR tests used during the pandemic to diagnose “COVID cases.” Those tests relied on single-step qPCR run at extremely high cycle thresholds—often 35–45 cycles—where background noise, trace contamination, and harmless RNA fragments can generate false positives. The method used in this new study, by contrast, requires two successful rounds of primer binding and amplification, reproducibility across multiple repeats, and then an independent sequencing confirmation to verify the identity of the product.
In other words, the COVID diagnostic PCR could detect any fragment of viral RNA and label it a “positive,” while this study’s nested PCR plus sequencing can only detect one thing: the exact Pfizer mRNA sequence, verified letter-by-letter.
This means the researchers were not detecting “noise”—they were detecting true, molecularly confirmed vaccine mRNA. It is the most definitive approach yet applied to this question.
One of the strongest aspects of this paper is the methodology. Where previous studies failed to detect vaccine mRNA, the authors explain exactly why: they were using qPCR, which lacks the sensitivity to detect low-abundance RNA months after injection. The new study instead used nested PCR, a two-step amplification technique that dramatically increases sensitivity and specificity, followed by Sanger sequencing, which literally reads the amplified sequence and confirms it matches the Pfizer construct. Each positive result was only considered valid if it appeared in at least three of four independent technical repeats, further reducing any chance that background noise or accidental contamination was driving the findings.
This approach is also fundamentally different from the PCR tests used during the pandemic to diagnose “COVID cases.” Those tests relied on single-step qPCR run at extremely high cycle thresholds—often 35–45 cycles—where background noise, trace contamination, and harmless RNA fragments can generate false positives. The method used in this new study, by contrast, requires two successful rounds of primer binding and amplification, reproducibility across multiple repeats, and then an independent sequencing confirmation to verify the identity of the product.
In other words, the COVID diagnostic PCR could detect any fragment of viral RNA and label it a “positive,” while this study’s nested PCR plus sequencing can only detect one thing: the exact Pfizer mRNA sequence, verified letter-by-letter.
This means the researchers were not detecting “noise”—they were detecting true, molecularly confirmed vaccine mRNA. It is the most definitive approach yet applied to this question.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:14 am to Placekicker
Vaccine mRNA Detected in the Placenta
88% of women vaccinated within 100 days of delivery had detectable mRNA in both blood and placenta. Even after 230–251 days, vaccine RNA was still found in some placentas.
This directly contradicts every official statement claiming mRNA “does not reach the placenta.”
88% of women vaccinated within 100 days of delivery had detectable mRNA in both blood and placenta. Even after 230–251 days, vaccine RNA was still found in some placentas.
This directly contradicts every official statement claiming mRNA “does not reach the placenta.”
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:15 am to Placekicker
mRNA Detected in Sperm and Seminal Fluid
Of the four vaccinated men tested:
Three produced viable sperm—and 100% of them had Pfizer mRNA in their sperm cells.
Two had detectable mRNA in seminal plasma.
One man vaccinated 168 days earlier still had mRNA present in sperm.
This raises profound questions about male fertility, germline exposure, and the possibility of transmission.
Of the four vaccinated men tested:
Three produced viable sperm—and 100% of them had Pfizer mRNA in their sperm cells.
Two had detectable mRNA in seminal plasma.
One man vaccinated 168 days earlier still had mRNA present in sperm.
This raises profound questions about male fertility, germline exposure, and the possibility of transmission.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:15 am to Placekicker
Long-term Persistence
Across blood and placental tissue:
Half of individuals tested more than 200 days after vaccination still had detectable Pfizer mRNA.
This is far beyond what Pfizer, regulators and public health authorities have claimed.
Across blood and placental tissue:
Half of individuals tested more than 200 days after vaccination still had detectable Pfizer mRNA.
This is far beyond what Pfizer, regulators and public health authorities have claimed.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:15 am to Placekicker
mRNA Detected in Unvaccinated Pregnant Women
Perhaps the most shocking finding:
50% of unvaccinated pregnant women had detectable Pfizer mRNA.
Two unvaccinated pregnant women had Pfizer mRNA in both their blood and placenta.
A third unvaccinated woman had mRNA in her blood alone.
The authors state plainly: “The source of this RNA has yet to be investigated.”
This appears to be the first direct evidence of mRNA vaccine shedding.
Perhaps the most shocking finding:
50% of unvaccinated pregnant women had detectable Pfizer mRNA.
Two unvaccinated pregnant women had Pfizer mRNA in both their blood and placenta.
A third unvaccinated woman had mRNA in her blood alone.
The authors state plainly: “The source of this RNA has yet to be investigated.”
This appears to be the first direct evidence of mRNA vaccine shedding.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:16 am to Placekicker
Conclusions
These results carry enormous implications. They confirm that the mRNA does not stay at the injection site; it does not rapidly degrade; it does reach the placenta; and it does enter the reproductive organs.
This verifies the biological mechanism behind delayed serious adverse events and also explains transgenerational adverse events—why babies born to vaccinated mothers are now dying at high excess rates even years later.
And beyond these concerns, the unvaccinated positives raise the specter that shedding is indeed real.
In conclusion, this study demonstrates:
Long-term persistence
Systemic distribution
Reproductive system exposure
Placental exposure
Possible shedding to unvaccinated individuals
This should immediately trigger market withdrawal and apologies to the public for inflicting grave harm based on fraudulent assumptions.
As more evidence accumulates each week, the legal ramifications for allowing these products to remain on the market become ever more severe.
These results carry enormous implications. They confirm that the mRNA does not stay at the injection site; it does not rapidly degrade; it does reach the placenta; and it does enter the reproductive organs.
This verifies the biological mechanism behind delayed serious adverse events and also explains transgenerational adverse events—why babies born to vaccinated mothers are now dying at high excess rates even years later.
And beyond these concerns, the unvaccinated positives raise the specter that shedding is indeed real.
In conclusion, this study demonstrates:
Long-term persistence
Systemic distribution
Reproductive system exposure
Placental exposure
Possible shedding to unvaccinated individuals
This should immediately trigger market withdrawal and apologies to the public for inflicting grave harm based on fraudulent assumptions.
As more evidence accumulates each week, the legal ramifications for allowing these products to remain on the market become ever more severe.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:17 am to Placekicker
Nothing to see here either.
Muh-Covid "pandemic" 19 vaccine -- "BUT.....BUT....IT'LL SAVE MILLIONS AND GRANDMA!!"
Anybody gone to jail yet?
Muh-Covid "pandemic" 19 vaccine -- "BUT.....BUT....IT'LL SAVE MILLIONS AND GRANDMA!!"
Anybody gone to jail yet?
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:18 am to Placekicker
Where can I go for sperm testing? Can I do it frequently, because I really need to make sure it is all gone..... or something like that?
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:25 am to Placekicker
quote:
Pfizer mRNA Found in Over 88% of Human Placentas- including unvaccinated
The ‘unvaccinated’ includes everyone who didn’t get the shots, and everyone who did. So, everyone.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:30 am to Placekicker
is this a reputable site?
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:38 am to Placekicker
I swear y'all believe some of the most retarded shite. The study itself has already been deleted from the journal that hosted it, which is why it only exists on schizo websites now. Further, here's an explanation of why their now-deleted study is total nonsense:
LINK
LINK
quote:
TL;DR: The study used faulty primers that match the human genome, so they detected human DNA instead of vaccine mRNA - that’s why 50% of unvaccinated people tested “positive”.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:51 am to Ingeniero
quote:
swear y'all believe some of the most retarded shite. The study itself has already been deleted from the journal that hosted it, which is why it only exists on schizo websites now. Further, here's an explanation of why their now-deleted study is total nonsense:
How much did Pfizer pay for this article??
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:03 am to Placekicker
quote:What are the implications!
The implications are enormous.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 10:23 am to LSUnKaty
quote:
What are the implications!
For one, Vaccine shedding, which was dismissed as a conspiracy theory, is real.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News