- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Has anyone else here started to listen to Candace Owens?
Posted on 12/21/25 at 11:28 am
Posted on 12/21/25 at 11:28 am
I have never listened to her, but since the same people who advocate for never ending perpetual war in the middle east and Ukraine, as well as desiring to return to the suit & tie Bush/Cheney brand of Republican neoconservativms, are telling me I should not listen to her and are constantly attacking her, she must be saying something worth listening to.
So, I listened to 2 hours of her podcast this morning while out on a run.
So, I listened to 2 hours of her podcast this morning while out on a run.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 11:29 am to goldennugget
quote:
I have never listened to her, but since the same people who advocate for never ending perpetual war in the middle east and Ukraine, as well as desiring to return to the suit & tie Bush/Cheney brand of Republican neoconservativms, are telling me I should not listen to her and are constantly attacking her, she must be saying something worth listening to.
So, I listened to 2 hours of her podcast this morning while out on a run.

Posted on 12/21/25 at 11:31 am to SlowFlowPro
Well I can definitely see why the "Screw the Poor & Start a War!" Republicans don't like her.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 11:32 am to goldennugget
NO. I didn't like her when she was "normal" either but that's because I'm probably racist and hate black women
Posted on 12/21/25 at 11:37 am to goldennugget
quote:
So, I listened to 2 hours of her podcast this morning while out on a run.

Posted on 12/21/25 at 11:48 am to goldennugget
She makes Alex Jones appear sane
Posted on 12/21/25 at 11:50 am to goldennugget
I have actually begun to listen a bit to some of her context here and there because I couldn't keep on relying on hysterical charges. The hearsay misquotes and a non-context smear campaign had obviously gotten out of hand to me.
Is she "nuts"? "Sick"? "Terrible"? Nope.
She is an easy listen, explains her theoretical positions concisely, with reason, and with passion. AND she appears to be quite sane AND credible. This will of course cause the usual meltage and gnashing of teef here.
Is she "nuts"? "Sick"? "Terrible"? Nope.
She is an easy listen, explains her theoretical positions concisely, with reason, and with passion. AND she appears to be quite sane AND credible. This will of course cause the usual meltage and gnashing of teef here.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 12:06 pm to EphesianArmor
She's not going to sleep with you. Lol
Posted on 12/21/25 at 12:06 pm to EphesianArmor
quote:
Is she "nuts"? "Sick"? "Terrible"? Nope.
No. She’s worse than that. She’s evil.
quote:
She is an easy listen, explains her theoretical positions concisely, with reason, and with passion. AND she appears to be quite sane AND credible.
And this is why right here. The way she calmly explains things to you with a smile on her face, exuding confidence and clarity, speaking to you like your best friend. That’s her tactic. What she’s really doing is feeding you a load of BS and counting on you not doing research for yourself. What’s worse is she knows what she’s doing. She is chaotic evil personified.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 12:16 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
She’s evil.
Oh yeah. I forgot to add that ingredient to the sauce.
quote:
What she’s really doing is feeding you a load of BS and counting on you not doing research for yourself.
Nice try. I already conduct my own independent research and WATCH with my own two eyes.
quote:
What’s worse is she knows what she’s doing. She is chaotic evil personified.
If you say so.
I am curious though -- this "evil" characterization has found an audience. What exactly has made you regard CO as "evil personified"?
Posted on 12/21/25 at 12:34 pm to EphesianArmor
quote:
What exactly has made you regard CO as "evil personified"?
Mainly due to the fact that she is deliberately starting a civil war in the GOP so she can increase her ratings and income.
Why do I assert this? Because she is claiming easily fact checkable things (such as the Egyptian planes) surrounding events like Charlie Kirk’s assassination and getting people riled up over things she knows aren’t true. And when you call her out for it she accuses you of being a puppet for Israel.
This post was edited on 12/21/25 at 12:35 pm
Posted on 12/21/25 at 12:36 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
No. She’s worse than that. She’s evil.
Found a Ben Shapiro fan boy.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 12:43 pm to RollTide1987
Posted on 12/21/25 at 12:58 pm to RollTide1987
I appreciate your honesty and clarification.
Man, gotta tell ya -- I have never considered CO to be that big a deal, nor powerful enough to create a CW. (There is already an ideological war within Big Tent GOP without her "help".)
CO's "rating" a factor? She was already huge (my understanding.) Again, her schtick to me is that she doggedly follows her instinct as to what issues in the public sphere don't seem honest of kosher (no pun intended)
I hear ya, but here's the thing; NONE of the "facts" you listed are slam-dunk "true"; there's background noise that's too noisy. There are inconsistencies in the narrative's "established facts" as well.
Was there Isreali financial and ideological influence and coercion of CK? Looked like it. Was the crime scene contaminated minutes after "murder" scene? Yes. Paved over within days? Yes. Is this Tyler guy the one or only perp? Sure doesn't appear that way. i won't even get into the whole "30 OTT" ballistics question (amazingly determined within seconds) or perp apprehension in exactly "33" hours.
Candice Owns "evil" for poking around at the "facts"? For extended deep investigations? Speculating on theories and posing questions to unsatisfactory, ambiguous answers?
quote:
Mainly due to the fact that she is deliberately starting a civil war in the GOP so she can increase her ratings and income.
Man, gotta tell ya -- I have never considered CO to be that big a deal, nor powerful enough to create a CW. (There is already an ideological war within Big Tent GOP without her "help".)
CO's "rating" a factor? She was already huge (my understanding.) Again, her schtick to me is that she doggedly follows her instinct as to what issues in the public sphere don't seem honest of kosher (no pun intended)
quote:
Why do I assert this? Because she is claiming easily fact checkable things (such as the Egyptian planes) surrounding events like Charlie Kirk’s assassination and getting people riled up over things she knows aren’t true. And when you call her out for it she accuses you of being a puppet for Israel.
I hear ya, but here's the thing; NONE of the "facts" you listed are slam-dunk "true"; there's background noise that's too noisy. There are inconsistencies in the narrative's "established facts" as well.
Was there Isreali financial and ideological influence and coercion of CK? Looked like it. Was the crime scene contaminated minutes after "murder" scene? Yes. Paved over within days? Yes. Is this Tyler guy the one or only perp? Sure doesn't appear that way. i won't even get into the whole "30 OTT" ballistics question (amazingly determined within seconds) or perp apprehension in exactly "33" hours.
Candice Owns "evil" for poking around at the "facts"? For extended deep investigations? Speculating on theories and posing questions to unsatisfactory, ambiguous answers?
Posted on 12/21/25 at 12:59 pm to RUFshreve
quote:
Found a Ben Shapiro fan boy.
Tim Pool is now just as hysterical and crazy as Shapiro.
Posted on 12/21/25 at 3:57 pm to EphesianArmor
Candace Owens is extremely intelligent, smart and possesses lightning quick logical thinking, speaking abilities. I've not seen ANYONE - ANYWHERE best C.O. in any Debate or Argument. One on One, whether the Platform, Person, Topic, etc - is true or false, fair/unfair, factual or fake - Candace will proceed to methodically, logically, tactfully destroy and/or win through reason, facts, preparation & intelligence! Her mind/brain is laser sharp, quick; coupled with an exceptional ability to speak, express, explain her position. She outclasses, outsmarts and in the end Wins due to her immense knowledge and skilled/perfect use of the English language & vocabulary.
Candace has appeared, testified in a wide variety of platforms, arenas, etc. And whether she is confronted, asked, questioned by Tip Top Journalists/Anchors in Network/Cable Media, Senators/Governors/Congress or other Politicians, Academia or Top Ranking Internet Podcasters......I've never seen anyone Best her in any debate, argument......regardless the topic.
Before explaining one of the primary reasons for all the hate, vitriol for C.O., let me first state that I am a conservative, white, male. But the unmistakable, irrefutable fact of Candace's vast, intelligence, abilities, talents..... while also being a Black, very Successful & very Attractive Female.....kicks up a lot of deeply covert/overt envy. We're all prejudice to a degree, and often unaware of it. Many people can not handle someone simply being smarter, more successful, more knowledgable and God forbid - Right! It makes many people uncomfortable. I'm not saying that C.O. is always right, or perfect. She's not, she's human. But, anyone who possesses the obvious, rare intelligence, skill, abilities that Candace Owens definitely has......is worthy of not only respect, but worth listening to, considering, checking out. With laser sharp critical thinking, speaking skills....it's also very likely she is also employing that same mind/brain to investigate, reason, evaluate various theories, data, evidence!
Many things that were considered conspiracy theories or "far fetched", crazy, etc. just a few years ago are now accepted by almost all.
Popular
Back to top

5








