- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Don Dubuc 870 AM 2hr Special Menhaden Discussion This Morning
Posted on 12/17/25 at 7:22 am
Posted on 12/17/25 at 7:22 am
Just a heads up for anyone in their cars or listening to the radio at work, tune in to 870 AM today to listen to Don Dubuc interview a few folks to dig into the menhaden (pogy boats) issues. Segment starts at 8 AM.
Listen to Ben Landry spin propaganda for the international companies raping our resource at 8am
Rep Orgeron will get on at 845
Chris Macaluso with TRCP and Rad Trascher from CCA will be on at 910.
Listen to Ben Landry spin propaganda for the international companies raping our resource at 8am
Rep Orgeron will get on at 845
Chris Macaluso with TRCP and Rad Trascher from CCA will be on at 910.
This post was edited on 12/17/25 at 7:25 am
Posted on 12/17/25 at 8:31 am to WizardSleeve
Don is hammering Ben on this. I’m pleasantly suprised
Ben had to play defense the entire time and didn’t sound good doing it
Ben had to play defense the entire time and didn’t sound good doing it
This post was edited on 12/17/25 at 8:33 am
Posted on 12/17/25 at 9:26 am to WizardSleeve
Wish there was a way we could listen online - but every link i have clicked is not Don Dubuc. Oh well, hopefully Don or someone posts a link to it after show.
Posted on 12/17/25 at 9:47 am to SilverPoon985
Don's show comes out as a podcast every week, I listen to it sometimes on apple podcasts. If I see it when it comes out I'll post here.
Posted on 12/17/25 at 1:20 pm to Bayou_Tiger_225
Normally I think Ben Landry does a good job arguing in favor of the industry, but usually he isnt talking to someone who knows the subject as well as Don Dubuc did during this interview.
The stuff about campaign contributions was not a good look for the pogy boats. Ben said “it isnt as much as you think it is” and then Don brought up the actual donations of $780k right after that. Made him and the industry look kind of dishonest. They made the contributions, they should own them and explain why they contribute heavily to politicians. He instead said “recreational anglers probably give way more to politicians” or something like that, which I dont think anyone believes. CCA isnt allowed to make political contributions as a non-profit.
The stuff about campaign contributions was not a good look for the pogy boats. Ben said “it isnt as much as you think it is” and then Don brought up the actual donations of $780k right after that. Made him and the industry look kind of dishonest. They made the contributions, they should own them and explain why they contribute heavily to politicians. He instead said “recreational anglers probably give way more to politicians” or something like that, which I dont think anyone believes. CCA isnt allowed to make political contributions as a non-profit.
Posted on 12/17/25 at 1:26 pm to WizardSleeve
quote:
Ben said “it isnt as much as you think it is” and then Don brought up the actual donations of $780k right after that. Made him and the industry look kind of dishonest.
Im not big into politics, but its funny for politicians to say it isnt much when the average louisiana household income is like $60k. Just shows how out of touch with reality most of them are.
$780k in contributions, what a dick.
Posted on 12/17/25 at 1:32 pm to WizardSleeve
Looks like it just got posted to Spotify for those on there. It's busted up into three segments.
Posted on 12/17/25 at 1:32 pm to WizardSleeve
quote:That’s exactly what he said.
He instead said “recreational anglers probably give way more to politicians” or something like that, which I dont think anyone believes
He also caught Ben in another gotcha moments
After Ben brought up the by-catch study saying the industry has far less by-catch than people think, Don then asked him why the industry won’t pay restitution on that by-catch like every other recreational angler would. Ben replied having to do that would effectively end the industry, which made no sense. If the by-catch is that small then the fines should be manageable. But we all know it isn’t, which is why they are so against paying restitution.
Don also asked Ben why Louisiana should be different than the rest of the gulf states that have either banned or heavily regulated the lovey industry. Ben’s direct answer was “our coast are different than theirs. That’s why.” No follow up or further elaboration.
Posted on 12/17/25 at 1:34 pm to WizardSleeve
quote:I was really impressed by Don. He had clearly read up on everything and was ready to go.
but usually he isnt talking to someone who knows the subject as well as Don Dubuc did during this interview.
Posted on 12/17/25 at 1:51 pm to Bayou_Tiger_225
quote:
I was really impressed by Don. He had clearly read up on everything and was ready to go.
Agreed. He did a great job. Came across as very reasonable too.
Posted on 12/17/25 at 1:56 pm to Bayou_Tiger_225
quote:
Don also asked Ben why Louisiana should be different than the rest of the gulf states that have either banned or heavily regulated the lovey industry. Ben’s direct answer was “our coast are different than theirs. That’s why.” No follow up or further elaboration.
Yeah he called Louisiana “a working coast” trying to imply that somehow we should tolerate factory ships harvesting everything they can simply because we dont have white sand beaches and condos the whole length of our coastline.
Posted on 12/17/25 at 2:52 pm to WizardSleeve
This is 100% on the greased palmed politcians. Did yall hear about how they were supposed to limit it to 1 miles and then the new gov got elected and it quickly changed to 1/2 mile?
Posted on 12/17/25 at 4:11 pm to Neauxla
quote:Yep thats what that $780k of known public contributions bought. Likely a lot more in unknown contributions like invites to Francois Kuttel's yacht in the Mediterranean or $15 million vacation house in Aspen. They bought a governor friendly to the industry.
supposed to limit it to 1 miles and then the new gov got elected
Here's a YouTube of the show from this morning if you missed it.
YouTube Don Dubuc WWL 870 Menhaden Segement
Posted on 12/17/25 at 5:02 pm to WizardSleeve
Sad that our children’s and grandchildren’s future can be bought for such a paltry sum.
On a side note, Gary Haynes (Laffy DA) was sentenced to 7 years last week on federal charges. Next up is Jack Montoucet our former head of WL&F. Hope that cocksucker gets sent away for 7 also.
On a side note, Gary Haynes (Laffy DA) was sentenced to 7 years last week on federal charges. Next up is Jack Montoucet our former head of WL&F. Hope that cocksucker gets sent away for 7 also.
Posted on 12/18/25 at 10:36 am to WizardSleeve
Thx for posting/updating on this
Much appreciated
I can't speak for the state as a whole, but I know those in my circles have seen enough of this kinda shite to dry up contributions
There is no excuse or rationalization for decreasing the buffer zone other than monetary gain for the benefit of individuals in a positions of power
Embarrassing and disappointing. I wish I could say surprising.
Much appreciated
I can't speak for the state as a whole, but I know those in my circles have seen enough of this kinda shite to dry up contributions
There is no excuse or rationalization for decreasing the buffer zone other than monetary gain for the benefit of individuals in a positions of power
Embarrassing and disappointing. I wish I could say surprising.
Posted on 12/18/25 at 10:49 am to Neauxla
quote:
This is 100% on the greased palmed politcians. Did yall hear about how they were supposed to limit it to 1 miles and then the new gov got elected and it quickly changed to 1/2 mile?
Who made this decision? Politicians? WLF? A commission? Someone needs to be accountable to answer the question as to “why”?
If it’s the commission, then who appointed them? Are they getting paid or is the politician that appointed them getting paid?
That’s where my breakdown in understanding is. If the people of Louisiana (the sportsman at least) are so against this, and have gobs of evidence against it, then why would the boundary get changed? Who can answer that question for the people?
Posted on 12/18/25 at 10:57 am to Slickback
quote:
then why would the boundary get changed?
When I learned there was a vote to decrease the buffer zone, I assumed this was a move intended to stop and satisfy those pushing for an increase.
Not in my wildest dreams did I think these idiots were that arrogant to think they could actually pull this off without major repercussions.
But here we are.
Posted on 12/18/25 at 9:31 pm to Slickback
quote:
Who made this decision? Politicians? WLF? A commission? Someone needs to be accountable to answer the question as to “why”?
The decision is made by the Louisiana Wildlife and Fisheries Commission. It is a board of 7 appointed commissioners.
quote:
If it’s the commission, then who appointed them? Are they getting paid or is the politician that appointed them getting paid?
They are all appointed by a governor. Some were appointed by JBE and some by Jeff Landry. The current makeup of the LWF Commission is 4-3 in favor of commercial interests, due to the appointees from Landry.
Landry’s campaign benefited from hundreds of thousands of dollars in contributions from the menhaden industry. There might be some other under-the-table benefits going on, but there was a ton of money publicly contributed by these menhaden companies and owners to Jeff Landry and they are now getting the benefits of cherry picked commissioners friendly to them.
quote:
That’s where my breakdown in understanding is. If the people of Louisiana (the sportsman at least) are so against this, and have gobs of evidence against it, then why would the boundary get changed? Who can answer that question for the people?
An excellent question. The 3 commissioners friendly to conservation and recreational interests voted against the buffer change. The 4 who voted in favor of decreasing the buffer are all aligned with commercial interests. Two own alligator farms. One owned a shrimp dock. Jimmy Martin was a commercial fisherman and was appointed by Landry early this year. Chairman Sagrera was also appointed by Landry this year and is one of the alligator farmers. This changed the commission to be favorable to the menhaden reduction industry.
I was in the Nov 6 hearing and it was very heated and obvious how each of them would vote. The 4 commercial friendly guys were confrontational to the commenters who were against the pogy boats. Jimmy Martin, in an bizarre off topic question, asked the owner of Puglia’s sporting goods if he sold barbless hooks, because if he didnt sell barbless hooks he was somehow doing more harm to the ecosystem than the pogy boats. It was the most wildly ignorant statement and I was embarrassed as a Louisiana resident that these guys are making such important decisions. One of the commissioners who owns alligator farms was on his phone the entire time, not really listening to the people who got up to speak and comment. The guy who owned the shrimp dock was the deciding vote and he voted with the pogy boats because the shrimp industry is aligned with the pogy boats. They kill a lot of bycatch also and view any threat to the pogy reduction industry as a future threat to them.
There is definitely a strange alliance and solidarity between the pogy reduction industry and all other commercial fishing and shrimping mom and pop businesses. It’s ironic because there would be more fish available for our commercial fishermen if it weren’t for the pogy boats and the real kicker is the reduction product fish meal and oil is almost exclusively used in aquaculture overseas, including shrimp and salmon that are sold back into our market to compete against our own domestic commercial shrimpers and fishermen. Omega themselves own one of the largest shrimp farms in Central America. They harvest our pogies to feed their farms.
One speaker got to the podium and brought up that the 2 commissioners owning alligator farms would be an obvious conflict of interest since the main cost in farming alligators is the feed… made from menhaden. So the cost of their feed would go up if the harvest of menhaden was reduced. It’s highly unethical and an ethics complaint has been filed, to my knowledge.
TLDR: Jeff Landry was elected from pogy industry money - he appointed commissioners friendly to the industry - they vote in their best interests, not in the interests of the people of Louisiana.
I will add that the menhaden people and their lobbyists are very friendly with Jeff Landry and this kind of stuff only happens with the governor on board. 100% he was aware of this buffer change. Many people reached out to him to try to stop it, telling him it would be a political issue for him later, but he ignored and essentially responded that these menhaden companies would lose jobs if we didn’t accommodate them. Or at least thats what Ive heard from more than one person who has spoken to him about it.
If you dont like what’s happening with the pogy boats, it’s ultimately all on Jeff Landry.
This post was edited on 12/19/25 at 7:22 am
Posted on 12/19/25 at 12:47 pm to WizardSleeve
I don't care who runs against Landry in the next election. Whoever it is, they got my vote.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 1:46 pm to WizardSleeve
The commission meetings and Votes are a legal Formality only.
You will never see those guys do what’s right for the state of Louisiana.
I always wanted to see a brawl breakout and hands be throwed when attending.
You will never see those guys do what’s right for the state of Louisiana.
I always wanted to see a brawl breakout and hands be throwed when attending.
Popular
Back to top
3







