- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Hegseth says he will not publicly release the second strike video
Posted on 12/17/25 at 5:20 am
Posted on 12/17/25 at 5:20 am
quote:
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Tuesday that the Pentagon will not release the full, unedited video of the U.S. military’s September strike on an alleged drug boat, which killed 11 “narco-terrorists,” including two survivors in a follow-up strike.
“In keeping with long-standing Department of War policy … Department of Defense policy, of course, we’re not going to release a top secret full unedited video of that to the general public,” Hegseth told reporters after briefing senators on the U.S. military’s ongoing, lethal strikes against alleged drug-smuggling vessels in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific.
LINK
That’s odd; they’ve managed to “edit” and release every other boat strike.
For the record, I am all for the bombing of boats carrying drugs. I am against breaking the laws of armed conflict and international human rights laws.
This post was edited on 12/17/25 at 6:20 am
Posted on 12/17/25 at 5:22 am to LSUTANGERINE
The Walls Are Closing In. Part 237. Electric Boogaloo.
Posted on 12/17/25 at 5:29 am to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
For the record, I am all for the bombing of boats carrying drugs. I am against breaking the laws of armed conflict and international human rights laws.
Perhaps the video is more graphic?
What laws of armed conflict or international human rights laws are you against that net the **exact** same result as "bombing drug boats"? Especially in reference to your implication of what's "hidden" in THIS video?
Posted on 12/17/25 at 5:35 am to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
I am against breaking the laws of armed conflict and international human rights laws.
except for when Obama killed Osama Bin Laden?
Posted on 12/17/25 at 5:46 am to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
That’s odd; they’ve released every other boat strike.
I'm for the bombing of the boats. I'm opposed to utter bullshite. Can anyone defend this logically?
Posted on 12/17/25 at 5:50 am to LSUTANGERINE
Why do we need to see them anyway?
Posted on 12/17/25 at 5:50 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Can anyone defend this logically?
Graphic?
Posted on 12/17/25 at 5:53 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
I'm for the bombing of the boats. I'm opposed to utter bullshite. Can anyone defend this logically?

Posted on 12/17/25 at 5:53 am to LSUTANGERINE
Why does he need to release the video?
So you ppl can cry about drug dealers getting blown up

So you ppl can cry about drug dealers getting blown up
quote:
For the record, I am all for the bombing of boats carrying drugs
Posted on 12/17/25 at 5:55 am to SallysHuman
quote:
Graphic?
Show the video of the capsized half of a boat with two survivors (reportedly) clinging to it trying to turn it over until right before the bomb hits. Then show the aftermath explosion with nothing there but fire.
Posted on 12/17/25 at 5:57 am to LSUTANGERINE
Why release it? Libtards made their minds up the moment Hegseth was the nominee that war crimes
They will just air it, doctor it, and so will foreign adversaries
Narcos getting smoked is a welcome change from the feds working with narcos
They will just air it, doctor it, and so will foreign adversaries
Narcos getting smoked is a welcome change from the feds working with narcos
Posted on 12/17/25 at 5:57 am to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
Show the video of the capsized half of a boat with two survivors (reportedly) clinging to it trying to turn it over until right before the bomb hits. Then show the aftermath explosion with nothing there but fire.
Why?
I'd rather see ANY OBL footage... that sure ain't happening.
Posted on 12/17/25 at 6:01 am to SallysHuman
quote:
Why?
Why as in why show it or why as in why not show it?
You said it was maybe too graphic. I provided a solution.
As for why, most people know exactly understand they aren’t showing it. It’s obvious. Not to mention Trump said it would be released.
This post was edited on 12/17/25 at 6:06 am
Posted on 12/17/25 at 6:05 am to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
As for why, most people know exactly understand they aren’t showing it. It’s obvious.
Which is what?
What is 'worse' than bombing a boat, observing two clingers on and then bombing it again?
Posted on 12/17/25 at 6:07 am to SDVTiger
Most transparent administration ever.
I want to enjoy watching the turds get bombed into oblivion.
I want to enjoy watching the turds get bombed into oblivion.
Posted on 12/17/25 at 6:08 am to PorkSammich
Naturally you are crying about it
Posted on 12/17/25 at 6:10 am to SallysHuman
quote:it was implied in my OP. Likely Breaking a law of armed conflict or international human rights law.
Which is what?
combatants who are "wounded, sick, or shipwrecked" and no longer pose a threat should not be attacked.
international human rights law Could apply. Under this law, lethal force can only be used when there is an imminent threat to life or serious injury, which experts argue was not the case for survivors clinging to wreckage.
“Law And Order”
quote:
What is 'worse' than bombing a boat, observing two clingers on and then bombing it again?
Not relevant
This post was edited on 12/17/25 at 6:11 am
Posted on 12/17/25 at 6:11 am to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
combatants who are "wounded, sick, or shipwrecked" and no longer pose a threat should not be attacked.
international human rights law Could apply
Always defending drug dealers
Back to top


26











