- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Nasdaq has submitted a request to the SEC for 23/5 stock trading
Posted on 12/15/25 at 9:17 pm
Posted on 12/15/25 at 9:17 pm
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. This post was edited on 12/15/25 at 9:24 pm
4
Posted on 12/15/25 at 9:17 pm to stout
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. It will be 23/5. Not 24/7 like the tweet says
quote:
Nasdaq plans to expand stock and exchange-traded product trading to 23 hours a day, five days a week, according to a filing.
The move follows similar initiatives by the New York Stock Exchange and reflects growing global demand for extended market access.
Always-on cryptocurrency trading has influenced investor expectations, with Nasdaq acknowledging that many of its clients are already active overnight.
Nasdaq is looking to enable nearly round-the-clock trading, aiming to match the increasingly global nature of financial markets and investor behavior, according to a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
Under the proposal, Nasdaq would expand trading hours for stocks and exchange-traded products (ETPs) from 16 hours to 23 hours per day, five days a week. The new schedule would include a day session from 4 a.m. to 8 p.m. ET, followed by a one-hour break, and then a night session running from 9 p.m. to 4 a.m. ET the following day. The trading week would begin on Sunday at 9 p.m. and close on Friday at 8 p.m., with the existing opening and closing bells at 9:30 a.m. and 4 p.m. remaining unchanged, according to the filing.
LINK
This post was edited on 12/15/25 at 9:23 pm
Posted on 12/15/25 at 9:21 pm to stout
I know the whole point is everyone is pushing for it to collect more fees.
I think the normal process where momentum is sort of cooled and people reset for the next day is good for stability.
I really see no benefits... But once again this is all about fees. They want more
I think the normal process where momentum is sort of cooled and people reset for the next day is good for stability.
I really see no benefits... But once again this is all about fees. They want more
This post was edited on 12/15/25 at 9:22 pm
Posted on 12/15/25 at 9:30 pm to stout
Is your goal to get a thread in every forum, every day?
Posted on 12/15/25 at 9:37 pm to UltimaParadox
quote:
I think the normal process where momentum is sort of cooled and people reset for the next day is good for stability.
No more after-hours earning calls
This post was edited on 12/15/25 at 9:39 pm
Posted on 12/15/25 at 9:38 pm to UltimaParadox
This is strictly for trading houses to make more fees? Seems like a good way to make an already volatile market exponentially worse.
Posted on 12/15/25 at 10:07 pm to UltimaParadox
quote:
I really see no benefits... But once again this is all about fees. They want more
The markets close WAY too early. I don't need 23/5 but the current banking hours suck.
Posted on 12/15/25 at 11:41 pm to GREENHEAD22
Looking up the moves of the market recently and like over 75% of all moves is AH /Overnight trading. This levels that out some.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 1:11 am to stout
I wouldn't mind extended through 5-6 pm...but that's about all I see as needed.
I'm sure this will just drive up fund manager fees as well.
I'm sure this will just drive up fund manager fees as well.
This post was edited on 12/16/25 at 1:13 am
Posted on 12/16/25 at 6:59 am to stout
quote:
No more after-hours earning calls
Huh? They would still have “normal” trading hours. This would just extend the pre/post market trading.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 7:07 am to DraggingPride
quote:
I'm sure this will just drive up fund manager fees as well.
Doubt it. Liquidity in pre/post market is limited and this won’t change that. Funds will still trade the vast majority of their shares during normal hours.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 8:09 am to slackster
Financial advisors around the country just went HO-LEE-FUK
God speed to all financial advisors if this passes. Their phones will ring/ping 24/7...or 23/7. I think this will cause people to want to panic sell even more than they already do.
God speed to all financial advisors if this passes. Their phones will ring/ping 24/7...or 23/7. I think this will cause people to want to panic sell even more than they already do.
This post was edited on 12/16/25 at 9:12 am
Posted on 12/16/25 at 8:47 am to stout
Trying to increase international users I assume?
Posted on 12/16/25 at 10:52 am to stout
how can i invest in Zyn and cocaine futures?
Posted on 12/16/25 at 12:50 pm to lynxcat
Why the downvotes?
Opening at 930ET and closing at 4PM ET is an unnecessarily tight window.
Opening at 930ET and closing at 4PM ET is an unnecessarily tight window.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 1:06 pm to lynxcat
Suppose you have ____% in nasdaq related investments. Do you really want to have to pay attention to how they’re performing for 23 hours a day?
ETA - After reviewing the details, I realize this is simply an expansion of the existing pre/post-market framework, which alleviates my initial concerns.
ETA - After reviewing the details, I realize this is simply an expansion of the existing pre/post-market framework, which alleviates my initial concerns.
This post was edited on 12/16/25 at 9:09 pm
Posted on 12/16/25 at 1:20 pm to Tiger4life306
Sounds favorable to the current system where I watch a stock plummet after hours, and I’m forced to watch helplessly until the market opens the next day.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 1:53 pm to lsuconnman
Yeah the current system surely hasn’t worked out over the long term for investors…
Posted on 12/16/25 at 3:45 pm to Tiger4life306
quote:That's certainly a take. How about you having the option to do (or not do) something about it?
Suppose you have ____% in nasdaq related investments. Do you really want to have to pay attention to how they’re performing for 23 hours a day?
If you don't want to, you won't have to.
Posted on 12/16/25 at 3:53 pm to castorinho
I would prefer to not have to feel obligated to deal with it or be concerned about having to do anything with it for up to 23 hours a day.
Personally, I think a break in the markets is better for less market volatility. With the markets opened 23 hours a day I think things are liable to spiral out of control. We will hit circuit breakers on a more regular basis than the current system. The break in each day gives people, investors, institutional investors time to pause and realize the sky is not actually falling
ETA - After reviewing the details, I realize this is simply an expansion of the existing pre/post-market framework, which alleviates my initial concerns
Personally, I think a break in the markets is better for less market volatility. With the markets opened 23 hours a day I think things are liable to spiral out of control. We will hit circuit breakers on a more regular basis than the current system. The break in each day gives people, investors, institutional investors time to pause and realize the sky is not actually falling
ETA - After reviewing the details, I realize this is simply an expansion of the existing pre/post-market framework, which alleviates my initial concerns
This post was edited on 12/16/25 at 9:10 pm
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News