- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Justice Dept. says a court ruling is blocking efforts to reindict Comey
Posted on 12/9/25 at 1:49 pm
Posted on 12/9/25 at 1:49 pm
quote:
Justice Department lawyers said Tuesday that a recent ruling barring their access to key evidence has effectively crippled their efforts to reindict former FBI director James B. Comey, two weeks after their original case against him was dismissed.
The concession came in a court filing urging a federal judge in Washington to lift a temporary order she imposed Saturday restricting the government’s ability to review or use emails and other electronic communications seized as part of an investigation more than five years ago involving Comey confidante Daniel Richman.
Richman’s records had played a central role in the Justice Department’s effort to indict Comey on charges he lied during a 2020 congressional hearing about authorizing Richman to leak information to the media — allegations Comey has denied. Tuesday’s court filing raised new questions about prosecutors’ ability to pursue their case against the former FBI director.
Richman, a Columbia University law professor who briefly represented Comey as his attorney in 2017, has argued that the Justice Department’s current use of those files violates his constitutional rights. Justice Department officials wrote Tuesday that without access to the communications between the two men the government is “effectively enjoined … from investigating or prosecuting Comey.”
https://archive.is/Hivgz#selection-375.0-423.392
Posted on 12/9/25 at 1:50 pm to loogaroo
There is a little more to it than that.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 1:51 pm to loogaroo
So the deep state just has better lawyers and are planted deeper than our current DOJ, that's all I see with this.
When the justice system has been tarnished so far that it's never about actual justice and just who has the most operatives and plants in place, how have we not seen vigilante justice yet?
When the justice system has been tarnished so far that it's never about actual justice and just who has the most operatives and plants in place, how have we not seen vigilante justice yet?
Posted on 12/9/25 at 2:00 pm to dnm3305
quote:deep state lawyers = DOJ lawyers
So the deep state just has better lawyers and are planted deeper than our current DOJ
Posted on 12/9/25 at 2:05 pm to loogaroo
These rogue judges are very frustrating 
Posted on 12/9/25 at 2:09 pm to I20goon
quote:
deep state lawyers = DOJ lawyers
I agree, but not all DOJ Lawyers = deep state lawyers. If they had any moral lawyers (oxymoron?), then actual law and order and prosecuting criminals would matter, but it seems to be the furthest thing from the job description for the people behind the scenes traditionally running this country.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 2:09 pm to dnm3305
quote:
When the justice system has been tarnished so far that it's never about actual justice and just who has the most operatives and plants in place, how have we not seen vigilante justice yet?
One side has already started their hot war. I don’t think they will be as supportive and tolerant when the other side wakes up
Popular
Back to top

3







