- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Good example of how Democrats stick together even when evil
Posted on 11/18/25 at 3:37 am
Posted on 11/18/25 at 3:37 am
Cliffs: Democrat does something extremely dishonest and unethical. Another Democrat calls him out for it. The entire Democrat contingent spends all their time and energy going nuclear on the lady who called him out.
The backstory is a Democratic Congressman from a heavily Democratic district was pretending like he was gonna run for re-election, it's one of those districts where incumbents always run unopposed.
He signed up to run for re-election, but nobody else signed up to run against him in the primary, per usual.
During the very last hour on the very last day of the deadline to sign up for the primary, his Chief of Staff signs up to be on the ballot and he simultaneously announces his retirement and removes his name, ensuring that his Chief of Staff is the only Democrat on the ballot and the assured eventual election winner given the district.
A Democrat congresswoman put forth a resolution in congress to denounce this behavior as unethical election subversion and essentially stealing the election from the voters hands.
The entire Democrat contingent basically spent all their time and energy tearing into the congresswoman who put forth the resolution, not even mentioning the actual issue at hand.
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5609627-garcia-retirement-controversy-house/
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. The backstory is a Democratic Congressman from a heavily Democratic district was pretending like he was gonna run for re-election, it's one of those districts where incumbents always run unopposed.
He signed up to run for re-election, but nobody else signed up to run against him in the primary, per usual.
During the very last hour on the very last day of the deadline to sign up for the primary, his Chief of Staff signs up to be on the ballot and he simultaneously announces his retirement and removes his name, ensuring that his Chief of Staff is the only Democrat on the ballot and the assured eventual election winner given the district.
A Democrat congresswoman put forth a resolution in congress to denounce this behavior as unethical election subversion and essentially stealing the election from the voters hands.
The entire Democrat contingent basically spent all their time and energy tearing into the congresswoman who put forth the resolution, not even mentioning the actual issue at hand.
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5609627-garcia-retirement-controversy-house/
This post was edited on 11/18/25 at 3:42 am
Posted on 11/18/25 at 4:46 am to StansberryRules
Thanks for posting. Not one of the hypocrites who defended Garcia should ever again pretend that they "care about Democracy."
Posted on 11/18/25 at 5:30 am to IvoryBillMatt
Hey, off topic but how far did you make it in your PhD program before you decided to go to law school instead?
Wondering how long it takes for most people to get the buyer’s remorse I’m starting to experience.
Wondering how long it takes for most people to get the buyer’s remorse I’m starting to experience.
Posted on 11/18/25 at 6:00 am to StansberryRules
There was nothing worse than Jay Jones in VA having his texts leaked about wanting his opponents dead … and all the Dems did was nothing.
No calls to step down, etc. Governor would not even address the question in the debate.
Thats the new playbook. Don’t address the issue and wait for the next news cycle.
No calls to step down, etc. Governor would not even address the question in the debate.
Thats the new playbook. Don’t address the issue and wait for the next news cycle.
Posted on 11/18/25 at 6:06 am to StansberryRules
That’s very shady and extremely unethical. FOIA their texts and campaign emails and you’ll find subversion.
Is anyone surprised by democraps behavior these days? I’m not.
Is anyone surprised by democraps behavior these days? I’m not.
Posted on 11/18/25 at 6:34 am to 4cubbies
quote:
Wondering how long it takes for most people to get the buyer’s remorse I’m starting to experience.
Sorry that you're experiencing that. I actually enjoyed the program, but after 6 months and getting to know my professors, I realized what a tough slog it would be just to find employment with a PhD...even from a great program...in American History. So, I was only in the program for one year
Posted on 11/18/25 at 6:38 am to GeekedUp
quote:
Don’t address the issue and wait for the next news cycle
Which they can rely on since legacy media is in their pocket.
Posted on 11/18/25 at 6:51 am to StansberryRules
Sounds like something Donnie would do….
Posted on 11/18/25 at 2:40 pm to StansberryRules
Destroying democracy is okay... as long as it's in the name of furthering the Democrat party and their objectives.
Posted on 11/18/25 at 2:41 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Wondering how long it takes for most people to get the buyer’s remorse I’m starting to experience
Buyer's remorse? Oh... Just wait until you go to law school.
Posted on 11/18/25 at 2:45 pm to StansberryRules
Good on Perez... shame on the rest of them.
That said, this can't be on the up and up- are there no repercussions for election rigging?
That said, this can't be on the up and up- are there no repercussions for election rigging?
Posted on 11/18/25 at 4:40 pm to BTROleMisser
quote:
Buyer's remorse? Oh... Just wait until you go to law school.
Oh heavens no. That’s 100% not on my bucket list.
Popular
Back to top
6








