- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
If This Isn’t an Emergency, What Is? The Tariff issue is not the slam dunk people surmise!
Posted on 11/12/25 at 9:39 am
Posted on 11/12/25 at 9:39 am
quote:
The Trade Deficit
In 2024, for example, China quietly announced massive export controls on rare earths — primarily such critical electronics materials as neodymium magnets. They set these to be effective in 2025, so the press reported it as if it was a reaction to President Trump’s tariffs, but China introduced this assault on our economy during the Biden-Harris regime’s final year.
We have trade deficits with most countries. This means we import more goods, by value, than we export. Supply-siders have always argued that there’s nothing intrinsically wrong with this; it could mean that our country is getting more for our money than the other country is getting. We send them dollars for their goods, and if they don’t buy goods with them, then they’ve just got useless paper until they spend it on our goods.
The problem there is that they don’t sit on our dollars; they spend them on things other than physical goods, causing new and worse problems. What have the Chinese done with its surplus dollars, for example? They buy up our housing, our farmland, our businesses. They plant students and professors in our colleges to spy for the CCP; they invest in our stock market so they can control our public companies. Our trade deficit — with many countries, not just China — has enabled dangerous relationships of all kinds in all sectors to balloon.
Defeating Us From Within.....
quote:
...... we have been in an international trade emergency for decades now. Flyover country understands it, even if the coastal establishment doesn’t.
In Federalist #70, Alexander Hamilton envisioned a time when Congress would be too confused, too slow-acting, too distant, or too factionally divided to act, and he called for “energy in the executive” when such urgent needs arose.
Through Sections 301 and 232, through the IEPPA and all the other legislation that the Trump administration has utilized, Congress laid the groundwork for President Trump to do what is necessary now that his action is needed.
With these tools, he and his team have made immense progress for our country in just this first year. To remove these arrows from their quiver, when they have already performed so well, would be economic suicide, cultural suicide, and national security suicide as well.
Posted on 11/12/25 at 9:43 am to Timeoday
quote:
they spend them on things other than physical goods, causing new and worse problems. What have the Chinese done with its surplus dollars, for example? They buy up our housing, our farmland, our businesses.
I'm not a journalist or an economist, but I'm pretty sure housing and farmland are physical goods. Most businesses would be as well.
Posted on 11/12/25 at 9:47 am to Flats
quote:And the “point” he is trying to make is that domestic reinvestment and return of capital is a bad thing.
I'm not a journalist or an economist, but I'm pretty sure housing and farmland are physical goods. Most businesses would be as well.
Posted on 11/12/25 at 9:49 am to Timeoday
The trade deficit isn't an emergency
The budget deficit is an emergency and Donnie is floating the idea of sending out welfare checks that would grow the deficit
The budget deficit is an emergency and Donnie is floating the idea of sending out welfare checks that would grow the deficit
Posted on 11/12/25 at 9:57 am to Powerman
Velocity is needed whether by check or tax credit. Bessent is talking tax credit. I believe the tariffs are here to stay.
This post was edited on 11/12/25 at 9:59 am
Posted on 11/12/25 at 9:57 am to Timeoday
Was this argued or mentioned at USSC hearing?
Seems reasonable.
Seems reasonable.
Posted on 11/12/25 at 10:04 am to Victor R Franko
quote:
Was this argued or mentioned at USSC hearing?
Seems reasonable.
I have not looked at the SCOTUS arguments, but there is more than one way to skin the tariff cat if SCOTUS decides against the current status quo. I noted John Roberts, a Bushite, called the tariffs a tax. Meanwhile, the admin is talking about income tax credits due to tariff revenue.
The hands still come out clean. Frig' Roberts. Maybe an investigation needs to be opened into Roberts' adoption of children. Maybe!!
Popular
Back to top

3









