Activist Judges Scorecard via %’s

Your post is very misleading as few cases make it to SCOTUS. In his first term his unconstitutional actions consistantly lost in court

During Trump’s first term, more than 246 agency regulations, guidance documents and memoranda were challenged in federal courts. The administration won 54 of the cases, a 22% success rate,

In Trump's current term his success rate is 31% it’s 57% Dem 43% Rep appointed judges. One area of consistent losses has been immigration. More than 100 Judges have ruled against Trump's immigration policies.

"The rulings come from judges appointed by every president since Ronald Reagan, including 12 appointed by President Donald Trump. One of those appointees took the bench just last month"

So much losing. Trump hates the Constitution.

So you’re saying, progressive judges are ruling against Trump’s agenda?

Boy, there’s a shocker.

quote:

---

So you’re saying, progressive judges are ruling against Trump’s agenda?

---

Nope, I am saying that the facts show that judges from across the political spectrum have ruled against Trump, including judges nominated by Trump. . These rulings often result in threats and harassment.

quote:

---

appointed by every president since Ronald Reagan,

---

Let’s take a look now that we (public non insiders political) now know what we didn’t know then.

Reagan - Loved the U.S., found out the Government was fixed, did what he could

Bush 1 - Deep State CIA Operative “new world order” , Cheney Deep Deep State. Amazingly we got Clarence Thomas

G. W. Bush - Deep State appeaser

Obama - Marxist Muslim hates the U.S. Still deeply involved in the overthrow.

Trump 1 - MAGA - clueless about deep state power, double crossed by his own supporting cast.

Biden - Brain dead, administration run by Marxist, overseen by Obama

Trump 2 - MAGA - Now knows what the deep state and world order is and is dismantling it as best as he can.

quote:

---

Bama Mountain

---

This has got to be the new oklatard alter

Did you read the OP. Schumer is admitting there are activist judges working against America. And you are defending that. You're not too bright

quote:

---

consistantly lost in court

---

And also consistently won in court. How about this nugget from that bastion of fair and balanced journalism, ABC

“I don’t think people paid enough attention to the fact that Trump heeded the Court and agreed to rewrite the ‘Muslim ban’ three times so that it would pass constitutional muster,” said Sarah Isgur, a former Trump Justice Department official. Sounds like he's complying with something that's about to tear our country apart. I hope you're not white because Mamdani says you'll be paying higher taxes merely based on your skin color

quote:

---

more than 246 agency regulations

---

I don't know which is worse, the corruption in congress or the overreach amongst govt agencies. But let's celebrate those guardrails being defeated in court. Congrats

quote:

---

his success rate is 31%

---

First, this isn't a win for America. Second, there is such a thing as activist judges, even ones he appointed.

quote:

---

One area of consistent losses has been immigration

---

Yeah, we all know. Let's keep that cheap labor and human trafficking and drugs rolling. We need to turn America into a country full of zombie citizens

quote:

---

So much losing

---

Says the person who quotes known lying sources of information. Do you know who funds factcheck.org? You quoted the NYT who has had to retract numerous claims. You even quoted freaking snopes.

quote:

---

Trump hates the Constitution

---

So we do have a king. Or is he complying with the courts and we don't have a king? Make up your mind.

What's going on is obvious. The country is circling the drain and Trump is trying to save it. He's getting blocked by bureaucracy. Yes, even from his own party. That's why it's called the uniparty or the establishment

Please say someone is paying you to do this. It will make sense why you're saying stupid things

quote:

---

So you’re saying, progressive judges are ruling against Trump’s agenda? Boy, there’s a shocker.

---

The fact that you think “Progressive judge” is acceptable (laudable?) but “Activist judge” is not, speaks volumes.

1) Why do you think a progressive is anything but an activist for change?

2) Why are you okay with a judge who does anything but interpret the law in settling disputes? Are you an anti-democratic anti-constitutionalist?

quote:

---

You say progressive, I say activist

---

This is the correct answer.

quote:

---

, they judge by Presuppositions, feelings and emotions.

---

And it shows, now matter how learned and 'intelligent' the individual, a liberal is attracted to TDS, as Hillary is to suicides.

quote:

---

quote:threats and harassment"menacing posts" BWAHAHAHAHA Have you looked at the left lately? They INVENTED menacing posts. Check the number of mass attacks over the last few years. LOTS of left people losing their minds. Hell, they're even attacking ICE buildings and officers for merely doing their jobs.

---

Seriously!!!

The left openly threatens the Supreme Court Justices regularly.

“Justice Kavanaugh, you won’t know what hit you”, weeks before an attempt on his life plotted and foiled by a left wing crazy.

Because Never-Trumper Republicans skew the data, which has a smaller impact on his second term