- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
i bought LMND today
Posted on 10/29/25 at 9:41 am
Posted on 10/29/25 at 9:41 am
revenues are growing, adoption is growing, chart looks interesting. earnings on 11/5. anyone else in this?
i just tried out the online interface and its pretty cool. all AI driven
i just tried out the online interface and its pretty cool. all AI driven
Posted on 10/29/25 at 9:53 am to cgrand
I've considered it several times.
I just don't know enough about it.
I just don't know enough about it.
Posted on 10/29/25 at 10:06 am to bayoubengals88
its spotify, except for insurance not music.
they just signed a deal to offer "pay by the mile" insurance with tesla
chart:

they just signed a deal to offer "pay by the mile" insurance with tesla
chart:
This post was edited on 10/29/25 at 10:40 am
Posted on 10/29/25 at 4:02 pm to cgrand
Algorithms have been flooding my social media feeds with Lemonade stories the past couple days, so I think they’re aggressively pumping social media influencers to create some AI insurance tech meme status.
Good luck with it. The sharing premiums with a charity of your choice seems as crazy today as it did ten years ago.
I’m also puzzled by the recent excitement about AI decision making. People don’t even want to use it at a drive thru…yet they want it to make decisions after they experience a potentially life changing event?
Good luck with it. The sharing premiums with a charity of your choice seems as crazy today as it did ten years ago.
I’m also puzzled by the recent excitement about AI decision making. People don’t even want to use it at a drive thru…yet they want it to make decisions after they experience a potentially life changing event?
Posted on 10/30/25 at 6:48 am to cgrand
I followed you around $60 as I thought it may break out of the triple top.
I think I will hang around through earnings for the most part.
Just 54 shares, but calls of 11/21 $70 and Jan ‘27 $60.
I think I will hang around through earnings for the most part.
Just 54 shares, but calls of 11/21 $70 and Jan ‘27 $60.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 9:08 am to cgrand
I bought in at $110 before the crash in the stock. I am happy to see that it is recovering and hopefully, I will at least come out even. I think they have got their crap together and have a good business plan.
*Edit: bought in at 550 shares
*Edit: bought in at 550 shares
This post was edited on 10/30/25 at 9:15 am
Posted on 11/3/25 at 8:53 am to cgrand
up 8% on my buy so far. seeing that earnings can be volatile with this one, its a small position so i'm going to ride it out. i sold a dog to purchase this so far so good
Posted on 11/3/25 at 9:49 am to cgrand
Market is down. LMND is up.
Cup & handle formation on the two year chart. Heavily shorted.
Gotta think an earnings pop could result in a major short squeeze on Wednesday or even Tuesday PM.
Cup & handle formation on the two year chart. Heavily shorted.
Gotta think an earnings pop could result in a major short squeeze on Wednesday or even Tuesday PM.
Posted on 11/3/25 at 10:13 am to TDFreak
quote:2MM less than last earnings date though. price has seen wild swings around earnings. if it goes up i'll be happy if it dumps i'll probably buy more...i do think the company has massive potential
Heavily shorted.
Posted on 11/3/25 at 10:21 am to cgrand
Sold at $16.45 early last year 
Posted on 11/5/25 at 8:36 am to cgrand
Yep. Congrats! and next quarter is supposed to be the big one!
I sold a couple of days ago, but we are still quite early.
I sold a couple of days ago, but we are still quite early.
This post was edited on 11/5/25 at 8:37 am
Posted on 11/5/25 at 9:09 am to bayoubengals88
LMND made me back half of what I lost overall yesterday. Very very welcome development
Posted on 11/5/25 at 12:49 pm to cgrand
and now I’ve made it all back
incredible
incredible
Posted on 11/5/25 at 1:03 pm to cgrand
I thought earnings were tomorrow. Dang.
Jumped in pre-market before today's open and added some more in the first hour.
Quick buck made. Wish it could have been more.
Jumped in pre-market before today's open and added some more in the first hour.
Quick buck made. Wish it could have been more.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 1:10 pm to cgrand
Rare case of a poster suggesting a stock before the pop.
I didn’t buy, mainly because I’m making a STRONG effort to save cash right now
I didn’t buy, mainly because I’m making a STRONG effort to save cash right now
Posted on 11/5/25 at 8:12 pm to TDFreak
quote:25% of the float sold short. Almost 16MM shares. Just poking around it does not look like there’s been an increase in the number of shares available to short. I’m assuming that means shorts haven’t started covering yet despite the 35% spike today.
Gotta think an earnings pop could result in a major short squeeze on Wednesday or even Tuesday PM
LINK
watching this is will be a learning experience for sure
This post was edited on 11/5/25 at 8:25 pm
Posted on 12/11/25 at 11:08 am to cgrand
new 52wk high this morning
small position but i'm up 50% thus far
LMND is an interesting company, banking on the concept of infinite scalability...that is, "what if revenues could grow infinitely with near zero additional overhead?" not to go all tesla-bro, but the test case here is insurance, what comes after that is what matters
small position but i'm up 50% thus far
LMND is an interesting company, banking on the concept of infinite scalability...that is, "what if revenues could grow infinitely with near zero additional overhead?" not to go all tesla-bro, but the test case here is insurance, what comes after that is what matters
Posted on 12/11/25 at 11:23 am to cgrand
I still can’t figure out the excitement. There’s a humongous backlash and lawmaker interest for companies like UNH using AI for its decision making. Yet, consumers seem happy to advocate the application to assess car wrecks.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 11:33 am to lsuconnman
i'm not aware of any regulatory issues. but the simplest explanation is this...AI agents are by definition faster, more efficient, more accurate, and more consistent than human brains in the "math" of assessing risk, setting premiums, computing loss/claims, finding and eventually preventing fraud, etc. once in place and learning/doing, there's no upper limit to the volume they can handle. that volume equals revenue.
try the interface you'll see it in action...after you make your inputs you get an actionable quote almost instantly. in reviewing customer feedback theres a clear affinity for this...the human factor (subjectivity) is removed. you know what you are getting, the rules are clear, the claims process can take seconds to start and complete. AI is not reviewing your car for damage, it is processing your claim within the limits of your policy and still relying on the estimate from your body shop. what it IS doing is learning from past claims...that data is instantly and permanently available to the bot to assess "reasonableness" and not at all dependent on whether a human claims adjuster is having a bad day...it's agnostic
try the interface you'll see it in action...after you make your inputs you get an actionable quote almost instantly. in reviewing customer feedback theres a clear affinity for this...the human factor (subjectivity) is removed. you know what you are getting, the rules are clear, the claims process can take seconds to start and complete. AI is not reviewing your car for damage, it is processing your claim within the limits of your policy and still relying on the estimate from your body shop. what it IS doing is learning from past claims...that data is instantly and permanently available to the bot to assess "reasonableness" and not at all dependent on whether a human claims adjuster is having a bad day...it's agnostic
Popular
Back to top

7







