- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Here's Why Kelly is Relieved! (ADHD'ers read the last 2 paragraphs)
Posted on 10/27/25 at 12:50 am
Posted on 10/27/25 at 12:50 am
When a new exceptional running back talent, such as Berry, consistently demonstrates their ability with every touch, it is imperative to continue utilizing him. LSU total rushing yards, 60yds (59 Berry) A&M 224yds
If the aforementioned running back successfully advances the team into the end zone on a subsequent play, it is counterproductive to then cease their involvement.
When Berry is designated for an inside run but identifies no viable path due to the inexperience of two freshman offensive linemen, and subsequently moves outside to score, it is illogical to persist with inside runs when an outside option is available. How about a pitch-out?
When your quarterback is consistently being sacked, (7-44yds) it is ill-advised to continue calling deep-developing pass plays. Instead, quick, short passes should be prioritized.
When your quarterback is injured, it is not prudent to repeatedly call bootleg plays. Instead, plays designed for quick ball release or running plays should be implemented.
When your team is trailing by a score of 49 to 18, it is inappropriate to reinsert your injured starting quarterback to attempt another long-developing pass, only to result in another sack.
I know most will blame Nussmeier for this failure but I pointed out evidence that this game wasn't blown by the players in this game, it was all coaching including the special teams coach!
We had too many 3-and-outs (3-13) which keeps our defense on the field way too long and that is exactly what happened to our great Tiger Defense!
If you can decipher football plays from the players you'll discover that 80% of the problem is the coaches not the players!
Considering Brian Kelly could not see this and change the offensive strategy after the first 3-and-out, tells me he is probably more relieved over his dismissal than anyone else!
If the aforementioned running back successfully advances the team into the end zone on a subsequent play, it is counterproductive to then cease their involvement.
When Berry is designated for an inside run but identifies no viable path due to the inexperience of two freshman offensive linemen, and subsequently moves outside to score, it is illogical to persist with inside runs when an outside option is available. How about a pitch-out?
When your quarterback is consistently being sacked, (7-44yds) it is ill-advised to continue calling deep-developing pass plays. Instead, quick, short passes should be prioritized.
When your quarterback is injured, it is not prudent to repeatedly call bootleg plays. Instead, plays designed for quick ball release or running plays should be implemented.
When your team is trailing by a score of 49 to 18, it is inappropriate to reinsert your injured starting quarterback to attempt another long-developing pass, only to result in another sack.
I know most will blame Nussmeier for this failure but I pointed out evidence that this game wasn't blown by the players in this game, it was all coaching including the special teams coach!
We had too many 3-and-outs (3-13) which keeps our defense on the field way too long and that is exactly what happened to our great Tiger Defense!
If you can decipher football plays from the players you'll discover that 80% of the problem is the coaches not the players!
Considering Brian Kelly could not see this and change the offensive strategy after the first 3-and-out, tells me he is probably more relieved over his dismissal than anyone else!
6
Posted on 10/27/25 at 1:04 am to rbm1
quote:
If the aforementioned running back successfully advances the team into the end zone on a subsequent play, it is counterproductive to then cease their involvement.
Correct me if I'm wrong.. The TD was his second to last carry of the entire game..
Posted on 10/27/25 at 1:08 am to rbm1
Outside of the Nuss injury, the players weren't really the problem for the most part this season. Twas the coaching and scheme.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 5:39 am to rbm1
Hmmm, maybe but what was really obvious was A&M had an advantage from the beginning of that game with speed and agility at the offensive skilled positions. Our first drive of the second half exposed our O-line by playing more man coverage.
We were doing ok defensively in the first half because they were trying to be balanced and throw it some. And we got a couple INTs. They just stopped throwing it in the second half and leaned on that mismatch and an undisciplined gambling defense.
We didn’t adjust.
We were doing ok defensively in the first half because they were trying to be balanced and throw it some. And we got a couple INTs. They just stopped throwing it in the second half and leaned on that mismatch and an undisciplined gambling defense.
We didn’t adjust.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 2:01 pm to Mobiletiggah
quote:
really obvious was A&M had an advantage from the beginning of that game with speed and agility at the offensive skilled positions.
Sure they were fast but so were we. 2 pick-offs proved we matched their skilled. The fact we only had one spy underestimated their QB running abilities not to mention zero sacks! ZERO! This kept their offense on the field along with out Defenses. A sure bet way to lose any football game. Zero adjustments to say the least!
Posted on 10/27/25 at 2:09 pm to rbm1
quote:
ADHD'ers read the last 2 paragraphs)
Yep, a lot of these "Dumb as Louisiana Swamp Muck" Ranters are still Drunk and/or High from the weekend. Even the ones that can actually read, would be mentally taxed trying to read all that.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 10:29 pm to semjase
quote:
Yep, a lot of these "Dumb as Louisiana Swamp Muck" Ranters are still Drunk and/or High from the weekend. Even the ones that can actually read, would be mentally taxed trying to read all that.
What the hell? Stop your sauce! I'm just offering a direct point for those who dont want the details!
Posted on 10/27/25 at 10:41 pm to rbm1
TLDR
Posted on 10/27/25 at 10:45 pm to rbm1
quote:
he is probably more relieved over his dismissal than anyone else!
Posted on 10/27/25 at 10:55 pm to wesman21
quote:
Outside of the Nuss injury, the players weren't really the problem for the most part this season. Twas the coaching and scheme.
I don't know about that. Perkins is a liability. Some of the wide receivers are non existent. I'll never get that DJ Chester (I almost put and left "Welter" lol) bowl over out of my head. We have plenty of player weaknesses but I can whole heartedly agree that a better scheme is possible and would help.
Posted on 10/27/25 at 11:01 pm to wesman21
quote:
Outside of the Nuss injury, the players weren't really the problem for the most part this season. Twas the coaching and scheme.
How true! They sacked us 7 times we hurried their QB twice resulting in 2 pickoffs! When a QB is allowed time defenses lose every single time!
Posted on 10/27/25 at 11:10 pm to tgerb8
quote:
but I can whole heartedly agree that a better scheme is possible and would help.
Look when you set-up your team to fail, unless there is an extremely exceptional player they will fail. Some coaches don't understand they are there to place players up to succeed according to their talent not force them into a box of how we run plays!
Posted on 10/28/25 at 12:46 am to rbm1
I do not see how any LSU fan can watch our O line "block" and NOT think we have a player personnel problem on o.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News