- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
HIRE ACT, Make sure you are watching which Senators say no
Posted on 9/20/25 at 1:19 pm
Posted on 9/20/25 at 1:19 pm
This bill would imposing a 25% tax on outsourcing.
HIRE ACT
You will find out real quick who actually believes in the Middle Class.
HIRE ACT
You will find out real quick who actually believes in the Middle Class.
2
Posted on 9/20/25 at 1:42 pm to 50_Tiger
And who is getting kickbacks.
Posted on 9/20/25 at 1:47 pm to 50_Tiger
quote:
A “foreign person” is defined broadly to include all non-U.S. persons, with an exception for corporations or partnerships organized under the laws of a U.S. possession.
What does it mean to be a US corporation?
My employer has 20k employees in India and that number is growing. Seems like this would have no impact.
Posted on 9/20/25 at 2:15 pm to hob
quote:
What does it mean to be a US corporation? My employer has 20k employees in India and that number is growing. Seems like this would have no impact.
How do you figure?
Posted on 9/20/25 at 2:25 pm to hob
quote:
Seems like this would have no impact.
A 25 percent hike per head would have a massive impact
Posted on 9/20/25 at 2:43 pm to Jorts R Us
Company has 60k employees. 20k sit in India. So instead of bringing them to the US they just move the jobs to India. It looks like there’s an exception for US Corporations.
Posted on 9/20/25 at 2:45 pm to hob
quote:
Company has 60k employees. 20k sit in India. So instead of bringing them to the US they just move the jobs to India. It looks like there’s an exception for US Corporations.
That's not what that's saying.
Posted on 9/20/25 at 3:12 pm to Jorts R Us
Ok, according to ChatGPT:
• The distinction here is whether those 20k people are:
1. Employees of the U.S. corporation (or a U.S. entity)
? not taxed.
2. Employees of a foreign subsidiary or third-party vendor ? payments to that foreign entity may be taxed.
• The distinction here is whether those 20k people are:
1. Employees of the U.S. corporation (or a U.S. entity)
? not taxed.
2. Employees of a foreign subsidiary or third-party vendor ? payments to that foreign entity may be taxed.
Posted on 9/20/25 at 3:39 pm to hob
quote:
Ok, according to ChatGPT: • The distinction here is whether those 20k people are: 1. Employees of the U.S. corporation (or a U.S. entity) ? not taxed. 2. Employees of a foreign subsidiary or third-party vendor ? payments to that foreign entity may be taxed.
The part you quoted is giving an exception for US possessions. Outsource back office to Mexico and you'll run afoul of this proposed legislation. Outsource back office to Puerto Rico and you don't.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News