Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Accident Report for B-2 mishap from Dec 2022

Posted on 8/6/25 at 9:56 am
Posted by FlyingTiger06
Bossier City, LA
Member since Nov 2004
1996 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 9:56 am
Link to B-2 Accident Report Public Release

The above link is to the Public Release.

Actual Report

This one is to the actual report. I ran the Safety Investigation into this mishap and agree with about 99% of what is contained in this report. Unfortunately, I can't get into the exact details of why, but I disagree with their conclusion that no amount of time between normal gear extension and then subsequent command of the emergency gear extension would have prevented this. It was my conclusion that absolutely matters.
Posted by Kansas City King
Columbia, MO
Member since Oct 2020
3487 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 10:00 am to
A single B-2 bomber is estimated to cost a little over 2 billion dollars.
Posted by jpainter6174
Boss city
Member since Feb 2014
6234 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 10:11 am to
Basically the crew didn't follow the check list... got it.

If any landing gear extension malfunctions are present, then aircrew should follow the Landing
Gear Fails to Extend/Emergency Extension checklist. The checklist directs aircrew to take the
following actions:
1. Landing gear handle – DOWN.
2. Landing gear emergency lowering switch – DOWN.
If all landing gear extend:
3. Do not retract gear.
If all landing gear fail to extend after 90 seconds:
4. Landing gear emergency lowering switch – RESET.
5. Landing gear handle – UP.
6. Prepare for gear up landing.
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
38237 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 10:17 am to
We just saw a 36 hour flight of the b2. Why can’t they extend the time to try these solutions over and over again?
Posted by cubsfan5150
NWA
Member since Nov 2007
17741 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 10:18 am to
Nice job by the maintenance lead in discovering the indication issues on the LMLG.
Posted by MorbidTheClown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
73394 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 10:18 am to
quote:

B-2 mishap


quote:

FlyingTiger06


checks out
Posted by FlyingTiger06
Bossier City, LA
Member since Nov 2004
1996 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 10:38 am to
quote:

A single B-2 bomber is estimated to cost a little over 2 billion dollars.


Yes, because Congress killed the program at just procuring 21 of them. The original plan was to buy over 100. When you have to divide the total cost of development and procurement by just 21 versus 100, the cost of each then just multiplied by ~5x.
Posted by FlyingTiger06
Bossier City, LA
Member since Nov 2004
1996 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 10:42 am to
Wrong checklist. They followed that one. When they ran that checklist governing emergency extension, they got good indications of all three gear being down and locked. So they would have stopped at Step 3.

What they failed at was acknowledging the one that said to wait at least 60 seconds between the normal gear extension and attempting the emergency extension. However, the AIB concluded that timing didn't matter. My investigation concluded it did.
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
47780 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 10:45 am to
quote:

Congress killed the program at just procuring 21 of them.

Old NASA slogan = "We can build it Fast, Cheap, or Good = pick any 2"
Posted by FlyingTiger06
Bossier City, LA
Member since Nov 2004
1996 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 10:47 am to
quote:

Old NASA slogan = "We can build it Fast, Cheap, or Good = pick any 2"


And the AF takes that a step further and says choose 2 to aim for and you will maybe end up with one of those two.
Posted by LordSnow
Your Mom's House
Member since May 2011
5975 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 10:49 am to
quote:

My investigation concluded it did.


How could you know that? You have no idea what would have happened had they waited the 60 seconds. Youre guessing.
Posted by FlyingTiger06
Bossier City, LA
Member since Nov 2004
1996 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 10:51 am to
quote:

Why can’t they extend the time to try these solutions over and over again?


With the component failure they had, there was no way hydraulic fluid would have ever gotten to the Right Main Landing Gear to unlock and begin to lower no matter how many times they would have tried to raise and lower the gear handle. That's what led to the emergency extension which uses a completely different path. And according to what the pilots could see in the cockpit, once they used the emergency extension, they had indications that all three gear were down and locked, so no need to try anything else.
Posted by FlyingTiger06
Bossier City, LA
Member since Nov 2004
1996 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 10:54 am to
quote:

How could you know that? You have no idea what would have happened had they waited the 60 seconds. Youre guessing.


Dude, I ran the safety investigation and we did certain tests that showed what the difference would have been. There's no guess in any of that. The recommendations from my report are what allowed Gen Bussiere to let the B-2s start flying again in May 2023. Unfortunately, I can't divulge what those tests were or the actual results because it is protected under safety privilege. And also unfortunate that the AIB was not able to duplicate those same tests.
Posted by Pfft
Member since Jul 2014
4835 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 10:54 am to
Should have called it the 2B
Posted by rattlebucket
SELA
Member since Feb 2009
12521 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 10:59 am to
quote:

We just saw a 36 hour flight of the b2.


Indeed we did but theyve been running that route for years waiting for that moment. I wonder if they never ran into this issue in all past years
Posted by FlyingTiger06
Bossier City, LA
Member since Nov 2004
1996 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 11:03 am to
quote:

I wonder if they never ran into this issue in all past years


Yes, they had...10 other times prior to this one. The one in Sep 2021 also led to a left main gear collapse. The other 9 all landed safely. What was different in those 9 cases versus the most recent 2, was the time between the attempt to lower the gear normally before commanding the emergency extension. That's as far as I can say.
Posted by BiggerBear
Redbone Country
Member since Sep 2011
3144 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 11:12 am to
quote:

With the component failure they had, there was no way hydraulic fluid would have ever gotten to the Right Main Landing Gear to unlock and begin to lower no matter how many times they would have tried to raise and lower the gear handle. That's what led to the emergency extension which uses a completely different path.


So it looks like the hydraulic failure of the RMLG that led to its needing to be extended using the emergency extension procedure led to the collapse of the LMLG on landing due to the loss of hydraulic pressure. If that is the case, why not use the emergency procedure on all landing gear so that they are not relying on hydraulic pressure to remain locked? Or is that even possible?
Posted by FlyingTiger06
Bossier City, LA
Member since Nov 2004
1996 posts
Posted on 8/6/25 at 11:19 am to
The emergency extension never applies hydraulic pressure to the lock link. It only applies pressure to a component (can't remember its name) that pushes the gear down and opens the door. Gravity then takes over and pulls the gear to the down position. Since left gear and nose gear and their associated doors were in the correct position, the emergency extension should have had nothing to do with it. The emergency extension was only to fix the RMLG. But we found there to be a flaw in the system that made that emergency extension have an unintended consequence that changes the position of the lock link on the gear that had hydraulic pressure applied to it; in this case the left main landing gear (the AIB noted that too). Since the RMLG lock link never had hydraulic pressure applied to it, the flaw was not involved.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram